Municipalities as Buyers of Reclaimed Building Material: Previous Experience and Future Outlook
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/joce-2026-4183Keywords:
Circular Economy, Built Environment, Public Procurement, Reuse, Recycling, MunicipalitiesAbstract
Circularity of construction material can counteract the large resource and waste footprint of the built environment. The public sector purchases a large volume of material and can potentially exemplify circular practices. This study aims to gauge which factors can influence local governments to include reclaimed construction materials in their tender process. Quantitative data was collected by surveying 104 municipalities in Norway via phone interviews. The survey revealed most municipalities had limited previous experience; however, a large majority stated high future likelihood of purchasing reclaimed material, partly influenced by the municipality size, projected population growth and prior positive experiences as explained by an ordered probit model. Top-ranked enablers for incorporating reclaimed materials in the tender process are economic incentives and infrastructure improvements, whereas regulation enablers and stakeholder pressures are ranked lower. Study findings can aid policymakers to develop public procurement guidelines that support circular practices in the tender process of local authorities.
References
Adams, K. T., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., & Thornback, J. (2017). Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011
Adserà, A., Andersen, S., & Tønnessen, M. (2022). Does One Municipality Fit All?The Employment of Refugees in Norway Across Municipalities of Different Centrality and Size. European Journal of Population, 38(3), 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09618-3
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Anastasiades, K., Dockx, J., van den Berg, M., Rinke, M., Blom, J., & Audenaert, A. (2023). Stakeholder perceptions on implementing design for disassembly and standardisation for heterogeneous construction components. Waste Management & Research, 41(8), 1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231154140
Austgulen, M. H., Skuland, S. E., Schjøll, A., & Alfnes, F. (2018). Consumer Readiness to Reduce Meat Consumption for the Purpose of Environmental Sustainability: Insights from Norway. Sustainability, 10(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093058
Balador, Z., Gjerde, M., & Isaacs, N. (2020). Influential Factors on Using Reclaimed and Recycled Building Materials. In J. Littlewood, R. J. Howlett, A. Capozzoli, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Sustainability in Energy and Buildings (pp. 37–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_4
Bigerna, S., Bollino, C. A., Micheli, S., & Polinori, P. (2017). Revealed and stated preferences for CO2 emissions reduction: The missing link. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 1213–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.020
CCPI. (2024, November 20). Norway – Climate Performance Ranking 2025 | Climate Change Performance Index. https://ccpi.org/country/nor/
Cengiz, A. E., Aytekin, O., Ozdemir, I., Kusan, H., & Cabuk, A. (2017). A Multi-criteria Decision Model for Construction Material Supplier Selection. Procedia Engineering, 196, 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.202
Chan, M., Masrom, M. A. N., & Yasin, S. S. (2022). Selection of Low-Carbon Building Materials in Construction Projects: Construction Professionals’ Perspectives. Buildings, 12(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040486
Cohen, J., Rosado, L., & Gil, J. (2022). How is the construction sector addressing the Circular Economy? Lessons from current practices and perceptions in Argentina. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1078(1), 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012008
Condotta, M., & Zatta, E. (2021). Reuse of building elements in the architectural practice and the European regulatory context: Inconsistencies and possible improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128413
Craig, M. (2022). Consumer attitudes and perceptions towards the use of reclaimed wood. Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/5481
da Rocha, C. G., & Sattler, M. A. (2009). A discussion on the reuse of building components in Brazil: An analysis of major social, economical and legal factors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.004
Densley Tingley, D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. (2017). Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.006
Desdemoustier, J., Crutzen, N., & Giffinger, R. (2019). Municipalities’ understanding of the Smart City concept: An exploratory analysis in Belgium. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.029
DFØ. (2024, September 5). Circular and Climate-Friendly Public Procurement (CCFPP). https://anskaffelser.no/en/english/circular-and-climate-friendly-public-procurement-ccfpp
Di Marino, M., Chavoshi, S. H., Andersen, T., & Nenonen, S. (2023). The future of multilocational work and New Working Spaces in small and medium-sized urban municipalities and in rural municipalities: A Norwegian perspective. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 77(4), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2023.2249480
Ding, Z., Nie, W., & Wu, H. (2022). Investigating the connection between stakeholders’ purchase intention and perceived value of construction and demolition waste recycled products. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(7), 9285–9303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01824-z
Egli, F., Knecht, N., Sigurdsson, F., & Sewerin, S. (2023). The politics of phasing out fossil fuels: Party positions and voter reactions in Norway. Climate Policy, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2276207
European Commission. (n.d.). Buildings and construction. Retrieved September 6, 2023, from https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/industry/sustainability/buildings-and-construction_en
European Commission. (2015, February 12). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the REGIONS Closing the loop—An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614
European Commission. (2016, December 12). EU Construction and Demolition Waste Management Protocol. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/20509/
European Commission. (2020, November 3). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN
European Commission, Oberender, A., Fruergaard Astrup, T., Frydkjær Witte, S., Camboni, M., Chiabrando, F., Hayleck, M., & Akelytė, R. (2024). EU construction & demolition waste management protocol including guidelines for pre-demolition and pre-renovation audits of construction works: Updated edition 2024. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/77980
European Parliament. (2008, November 19). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Text with EEA relevance). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/98/oj/eng
Evertsen, P. H., & Knotten, V. (2024). Toward a collaborative circular ecosystem within the built environment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 52, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.019
Fauske, K. R., & Schrader, J. (2017). Green public procurement practices in Norway: The application of environmental criteria and the use of scoring rules in Norwegian road transport tenders [Master thesis]. https://openaccess.nhh.no/nhh-xmlui/handle/11250/2486965
Fila, D., Fünfgeld, H., & Dahlmann, H. (2024). Climate change adaptation with limited resources: Adaptive capacity and action in small- and medium-sized municipalities. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(3), 5607–5627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02999-3
Foged, S. K. (2016). The Relationship Between Population Size and Contracting Out Public Services: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment in Danish Municipalities. Urban Affairs Review, 52(3), 348–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415591288
Fufa, S. M., Brown, M. K., Hauge, Å. L., Johnsen, S. Å., & Fjellheim, K. (2023). User perspectives on reuse of construction products in Norway: Results of a national survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 408, 137067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137067
Gangsø, M. R. S., Lien, G., Mehmetoglu, M., Sjølie, H. K., & Størdal, S. (2025). Intentions of housing developers to reuse wood materials in buildings. Journal of Industrial Ecology, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13618
Geldermans, B., Tenpierik, M., & Luscuere, P. (2019). Circular and Flexible Infill Concepts: Integration of the Residential User Perspective. Sustainability, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010261
Giesekam, J., Barrett, J. R., & Taylor, P. (2016). Construction sector views on low carbon building materials. Building Research & Information, 44(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872
Giorgi, S., Lavagna, M., Wang, K., Osmani, M., Liu, G., & Campioli, A. (2022). Drivers and barriers towards circular economy in the building sector: Stakeholder interviews and analysis of five European countries policies and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 336, 130395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130395
Guo, B., Geng, Y., Ren, J., Zhu, L., Liu, Y., & Sterr, T. (2017). Comparative assessment of circular economy development in China’s four megacities: The case of Beijing, Chongqing, Shanghai and Urumqi. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.061
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Heltorp, K., Groba, U., & Nyrud, A. Q. (2023). Circular wood construction—Expectations, experiences and acceptance among users, architects and industry representatives. Proceedings.Com, 1067–1074. https://doi.org/10.52202/069179-0146
Hemström, K., Mahapatra, K., & Gustavsson, L. (2017). Architects’ perception of the innovativeness of the Swedish construction industry. Construction Innovation, 17(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-06-2015-0038
Hofstede, G., Garibaldi de Hilal, A. V., Malvezzi, S., Tanure, B., & Vinken, H. (2010). Comparing Regional Cultures Within a Country: Lessons From Brazil. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109359696
Høibye, L., & Sand, H. (2018, March 8). Circular economy in the Nordic construction sector. https://doi.org/10.6027/TN2018-517
Hunka, A., Vanacore, E., Mellquist, A.-C., & Fuertes-Gine, L. (2023). How to increase the uptake of circular public procurement? Lessons learned from local authorities in Sweden. Journal of Public Procurement, 23(2), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-2022-0039
Jacobsen, D. I., & Holtskog, K. H. S. (2013). Nærhetseffekten – kommunal service, kommunestørrelse og ny teknologi. Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning, 54(4), 408–436. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-291X-2013-04-01
Khatri, S., Sjølie, H. K., & Nyrud, A. Q. (2025). Consumer drivers for intended adoption of recycled wood as construction material. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy, 10, 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100129
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Knoth, K., Fufa, S. M., & Seilskjær, E. (2022). Barriers, success factors, and perspectives for the reuse of construction products in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130494
Kommunal- og distriktsdepartementet. (2022, July 1). Forskrift om endring i forskrift om tekniske krav til byggverk (Byggteknisk forskrift). https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2022-05-29-945
Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet. (2017, June 21). Forskrift om tekniske krav til byggverk (Byggteknisk forskrift). https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2017-06-19-840
Kummen, T. M., Bohne, R. A., Lohne, J., & Rasmussen, F. N. (2024). Circular economy processes in the Nordic municipal building sector – a comparison of practices and policies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1363(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1363/1/012006
Liu, B., Huo, T., Liao, P., Gong, J., & Xue, B. (2015). A Group Decision-Making Aggregation Model for Contractor Selection in Large Scale Construction Projects Based on Two-Stage Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(5), 855–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9418-2
Ludwig, G. (2019). The Role of Law in Transformative Environmental Policies—A Case Study of “Timber in Buildings Construction in Germany.” Sustainability, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030842
McFadden, D. (2017). Chapter 6: Stated preference methods and their applicability to environmental use and non-use valuations. In Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods (pp. 153–187). https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap-oa/edcoll/9781786434685/9781786434685.00012.xml
Mhatre, P., Gedam, V. V., Unnikrishnan, S., & Raut, R. D. (2023). Circular economy adoption barriers in built environment- a case of emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 392, 136201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136201
Michelsen, O., & de Boer, L. (2009). Green procurement in Norway; a survey of practices at the municipal and county level. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.001
Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development. (2021, August 19). The financing of the local government sector [Redaksjonellartikkel]. Regjeringen.No; regjeringen.no. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/kommuner-og-regioner/municipal-economy/finansiering-av-kommunesektoren/financing-of-the-sector/id552048/
Nærings- og fiskeridepartementet. (2024, January 1). Forskrift om endring i forskrift om offentlige anskaffelser (anskaffelsesforskriften), forskrift om innkjøpsregler i forsyningssektorene (forsyningsforskriften) og forskrift om konsesjonskontrakter (konsesjonskontraktforskriften). https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2023-08-01-1305
Nawi, M. N. M., Osman, W. N., Saad, R., & Ismail, R. (2017). Factors Affecting Systematic Implementation of Reduce and Recycle in Construction Industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.59160/ijscm.v6i1.1626
Nesse, P. J., Lindtvedt, I. C., & Frøhaug, R. S. (2021). The Municipality’s Role in a Smart Internet of Things Ecosystem. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA), 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.20210101.oa5
Nußholz, J., Nygaard Rasmussen, F., & Milios, L. (2019). Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.036
Nykamp, H. (2020). Policy Mix for a Transition to Sustainability: Green Buildings in Norway. Sustainability, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020446
O’brien, R. M. (2007). A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
OSCE. (2024, June 11). Natur og Ungdom: The power of solidarity among majority and minority youth. https://www.osce.org/hcnm/577957
Ottosen, L. M., Jensen, L. B., Astrup, T., McAloone, T. C., Ryberg, M., Thuesen, C., Christiansen, S., Pedersen, A. J., & Odgaard, M. H. (2021). Implementation stage for circular economy in the Danish building and construciton sector. Detritus, 16, 26. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2021.15110
Parikka-Alhola, K., Nissinen, A., & Ekroos, A. (2007). Green Award Criteria in the Most Economically Advantageous Tender in Public Purchasing.
Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring innovation in product chains [Text]. https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/circular-economy-measuring-innovation-in-product-chains
Ramos, M., & Martinho, G. (2022). Relation between construction company size and the use of recycled materials. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103523
Skill, K., Farhangi, M., & Trygg, K. (2024). Size matters: Action space for sustainability transition among planners in Swedish municipalities. Urban Research & Practice, 17(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2023.2209554
Sparrevik, M., Wangen, H. F., Fet, A. M., & De Boer, L. (2018). Green public procurement – A case study of an innovative building project in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.048
Standard Norge. (n.d.). Ny Norsk Standard-serie for returtre. Retrieved March 25, 2025, from https://standard.no/kurs-og-radgiving/standard-morgen/avholdte-standard-morgen/ny-norsk-standard-serie-for-returtre/
Statistics Norway. (n.d.-a). 11342: Areal og befolkning i kommuner, fylker og hele landet (K) 2007 - 2024. Statistikkbanken. SSB. Retrieved February 2, 2025, from https://www.ssb.no/system/
Statistics Norway. (n.d.-b). 14288: Population projections 1 January, by sex and age, in 9 alternatives (M) 2024 - 2050. SSB. Retrieved February 2, 2025, from https://www.ssb.no/en/system/
Statistics Norway. (2024a, June 5). Municipal population projections 2024. SSB. https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/befolkningsframskrivinger/artikler/municipal-population-projections-2024
Statistics Norway. (2024b, June 17). Property management, local government. SSB. https://www.ssb.no/en/offentlig-sektor/offentlig-forvaltning/statistikk/eiendomsforvaltning-i-kommunesektoren
Statistics Norway. (2025, March 18). 12134: Financial key figures for municipalities (M) 2015 - 2024. Statbank Norway. SSB. https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/12134/
Størdal, S., Gangsø, M. R., Lien, G., & Sjølie, H. K. (2024). Drivers of housing developers’ perception on future construction reuse material premium for wood. Journal of Cleaner Production, 476, 143642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143642
Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Frey, M., & Daddi, T. (2012). What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey. Ecological Economics, 82, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.011
Tomczak, A., Łuczkowski, M., Hjelseth, E., & Sujan, S. F. (2023). Challenges and experiences with the reuse of products in building design. In ECPPM 2022—eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction 2022. CRC Press.
Valgdirektoratet. (n.d.). Municipal and county council elections 2023. Retrieved February 2, 2025, from https://www.valg.no/en/for-voters/municipal-and-county-council-elections-2023/
Williams, J. (2023). Circular cities: Planning for circular development in European cities. European Planning Studies, 31(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2060707
World Bank. (2020, March 23). Global Public Procurement Database: Share, Compare, Improve! [Text/HTML]. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/03/23/global-public-procurement-database-share-compare-improve
Yu, Y., Junjan, V., Yazan, D. M., & Iacob, M.-E. (2022). A systematic literature review on Circular Economy implementation in the construction industry: A policy-making perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 183, 106359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106359
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data collected in this research study is available at: https://doi.org/10.18710/0OHXF7.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shumaila Khatri, Hanne Sjølie, Anders Nyrud (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.