How the Textile and Fashion Industry Become Circular: Collaborative Frontrunner Practices Leading to Decentralized Collaborative Governance of Ecosystems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/joce-2026-3568Keywords:
Green Transition, Collaborative Governance, EcosystemsAbstract
This paper discusses how the concept of collaborative governance may contribute to our understanding of the dynamics of circular business ecosystems. This is done in three steps. First, the concepts of circular business ecosystem and collaborative governance are discussed and combined. Second, the ensuing theoretical framework is used to analyze the circular business ecosystem behavior of seven frontrunner companies, especially focusing on ecosystem governance configuration and ecosystem role dynamics. Third, based on an identification of three patterns of strategic response among the frontrunners, the paper discusses variations of strategic behavior, ecosystem role dynamics, and changes of governance. By identifying and applying four theoretical insights from the combination of circular business ecosystem thinking and collaborative governance thinking, the paper develops a new framework for analyzing and understanding the interplay between strategic behavior and ecosystem evolution and co-evolution, including how ecosystem sensing and seizing deviate across different patterns of strategic behavior.
References
Aakko, M. & Niinimäki, K. (2024). Managing and Negotiating: Quality Work in Clothing and Textiles Companies. Fashion Practice. 16(3), 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2024.2338995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2024.2338995
Adner, R. (2013). The wide lens: What successful innovators see that others miss. Pen-guin/Portfolio.
Adner, R. & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strate-gic Management Journal. 31, 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
Adner, R. & Kapoor, R. (2016). Right tech, wrong time. Harvard Business Review. 94(11), 60–67. https://research.ebsco.com/c/p75bir/viewer/pdf/atqkwpz2zv.
Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mumo32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Bevir, M. (2006). Democratic Governance: Systems and Radical Perspectives. Public Admin-istration Review. 66(3), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00599.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00599.x
Bianchi, C. (2021). Fostering Sustainable Community Outcomes through Policy Networks: A Dynamic Performance Governance Approach. In Meek, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Collaborative Public Management (pp. 333–356). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901917.00036
Bianchi, C., Nasi, G. & Rivenbark, W.C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: mod-els, experiences, and challenges. Political Management Review, 23(11), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777
Bingham, L.B. (2011). Collaborative Governance. In Bevir, M. (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Governance (pp. 386–401). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200964.n25
Brinkmann, S. & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews. Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research In-terviewing. Sage.
Castillo-Ospina, D.A., Ormazabel, M., Gomes, L. de Vasconcelos & Ometto, A.R. (2025). A dynamic capabilities framework for building circular ecosystems by focal firms. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 54, 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.022
Centobelli, P., Abbate, S., Nadeem, S.P., Garza-Reyes, J.A. (2022). Slowing the fast fashion industry: An all-round perspective. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemestry, 38, 100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100684
Dansk Mode & Tekstil (2025). Survey 2024: DM&T’s study of sustainability efforts in the Danish fashion and textile industry. https://www.dmogt.dk/raadgivning/baeredygtighed-og-samfundsansvar/dmogts-baeredygtighedsanalyse.
Driessen, P.P.J., Dieperink, V., van Laerhoven, F., Runhaar, H.A.C. & Vermeulen, W.J.V. (2012). Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance – Experiences from the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1580
Dzhengiz, T., Riandita, A. & Broström, A. (2023). Configurations of sustainability-oriented textile partnerships. Business Strategy and the Environmentm, 32(7), 4392–4412. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3372
Emerson, K. & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance Regimes. Georgetown Univer-sity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book44406
Ferrari, A.G., Armellini, F., Jugend, D., Pulizzotto, D. & Beaudry, C. (2025). Are Ecosystems the Missing Link in Circular Transitions? Insights From a Comprehensive Literature Analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment. 0, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70387
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative In-quiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M.P.P., Pigosso, D.C.A. & Soufani, K. (2020). Circular business models: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 277, 123741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741
Geissdoerfer, M., Kanda, W. & Kirchherr, J. (2026). Conceptualizing Circular Ecosystems: An Analysis of 45 Definitions. Business Strategy and the Environment. 35, 2368–2394. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70242
Gjerding, A.N. & Larsen, M.V. (2024). Collaborative governance in the textiles industry – principles, types, and reflection. White Paper. Aalborg University Business School. www.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/749279/375/WP_3_final_contribution.pdf.
Gomes, L.A. de Vasconcelos, Farrago, F.E., Facin, A.L.F., Flechas, X.A. & Silva, L.E.N. (2023). From open business model to ecosystem business model: A process view. Technologi-cal Forecasting & Social Change. 194, 122668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122668
Gomes, L.A. de Vasconcelos, Castillo-Ospina, D.A., Facin, A.L.F., Ferraira, C. dos Santos & Ometto, A.R. (2023a). Circular ecosystem innovation as portfolio management. Technovation, 124, 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102745
Hou, H. & Shi, Y. (2021). Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A construc-tive examination. Technovation, 100, 102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102193
Iansiti, M. & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–81. https://research.ebsco.com/c/p75/viewer/pdf/r2hosdayy5. (Limited access)
Jabbour, C.J.C., Sarkis, J., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Renwick, D.W.S., Singh, S.K., Grebinevych, O., Kruglianskas, I. & Filho, M.G. (2019). Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the ‘human side’ of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 793-801. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.038
Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C. & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 2255-2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Johnson, J.L., Adkins, D. & Chauvin, S. (2020). Quality Research in Pharmacy Education. A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research. American Journal of Phar-maceutical Education, 84(1), 7120. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120
Kanda, W. (2023). Systems and Ecosystems in the Circular Economy: What’s the Difference? Journal of Circular Economy, 1(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55845/RMDN3752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55845/RMDN3752
Kanda, W., Geissdoerfer, M. & Hjelm, O. (2021). From circular business models to circular business ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 2814–2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2895
Kelman, C.C., Brady, U., Raschke, B.A. & Schoon, M.L. (2023). A Systematic Review of Key factors of Effective Collaborative Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Society & Natural Resources, 36(11), 1452–1470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2228234
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An anal-ysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Kitzmann, N.H. et al. (2025). Planetary Health Cehck 2025. Potsdam Institute for Climate Im-pact Research. https://doi.org/10.48485/pik.2025.017.
Klooster, A., Bellostas, B.C., Henry, M., Shen, L. (2024). Do We Save the Environment by Buying Second-Hand Clothes? The Environmental Impacts of Second-Hand Textile Fashion and the Influence of Consumer Choices. Journal of Circular Economy, 2(3), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.55845/ZZUG7076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55845/ZZUG7076
Konietzko, J., Bocken, N. & Hultink, E.J. (2018). Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. Journal of Cleaner Production. 253, 119942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clepro.2019.119942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942
Kvale, S. (1995). The Social Construction of Validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100103
Lacy, P., Long, J. & Spindler, W. (2020). The Circular Economy Handbook: Realizing the Cir-cular Advantage. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95968-6
Logan, H.M., Rossi, V., Hansen, K.K., Søndergaard, M.Z. & Damgaard, A. (2025). Assessing the circularity potential of textile flows for future markets in Denmark: A study of the textile anatomy. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 59, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.002
Moore, J.F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review. May-June, 75-86. https://research.ebsco.com/c/p75bir/viewer/pdf/jid5jzqaj.
Moore, J.F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. HarperCollins.
Niinimäki, K. Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, P., Gwilt, A. (2020). The environ-mental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 1, 189–200. www.nature.com/articles/s43017-020-0039-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9
Palinkas, L.A., Horwits, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N. & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implemen-tation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Re-search, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Qi, H. & Ran, B. (2024). Paradoxes in collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 26(10), 2728–2753. https://doi.org/101080/14719037.2023.21966290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2196290
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics. Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Econo-mist. Random House Business Books.
Rittel, H.W. & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sci-ences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Sarja, M., Mäkelä, M., Onkila, T., Koistinen, K., Teerikangas, S. & Valkjärvi, M. (2025). All for One and One for All: Inter-Firm Collaboration in the Transformation Towards a Circular Economy. Sustainable Development, 33(Suppl.1), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70020
Sewenet, A.D., Boulaksil, Y. & Pisano, P. (2026). Circular economy, circularity, and sustaina-bility: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Cleaner Environmental Systems. 20, 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2026.100405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2026.100405
Shao, Q. (2025). Systematic review of Doughnut Economics from 2012 to 2024. Sustainability Science, 20, 1055–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01640-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01640-8
Tabares, S. & Kanda, W. (2026). Upscaling niche innovations by circular start-ups for sustain-ability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 58, 101067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.101067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.101067
Tansley, A.G. (1935). The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology. 16(3), 284–307. https://doi-org.zorac.aub.aau.dk/10.2307/1930070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070
Todeschini, B.V., Cortimiglia, M.N. & de Medeiros, J.F. (2020). Collaboration practices in the fashion industry: Environmentally sustainable innovations in the value chain. Environmental Science and Policy, 106, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.003
Tracy, S.J. (2026). Practicing Qualitative Research Under the “Big Tent”: Origins, Develop-ment, and Continuing Relevance of the Eight Big-Tent Framework for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 32(3-4), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251348167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251348167
Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M. & de Jong, J. (2025). Performance Management in Collabo-rative Governance: A Review of the Literature and Synthesis of the Challenges. Public Perfor-mance & Management Review, 48(4), 735–767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2510973
Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press.
Williamson, O.E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. Amer-ican Journal of Sociology, 87, 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Insights into the communicative validation process described in section 3 regarding minutes, presentations, and thick case description, can be provided by contact to the corresponding author.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Allan Næs Gjerding, Mette Vinther Larsen, Isabelle Marita Svane-Nielsen, Søren Kerndrup (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.