Navigational Agency of Cooperatives Deploying Technology for Circular Economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/joce-2026-4126Keywords:
Cooperatives, Technology, Circular Economy, Cooperative Identity, Agency, Socio-Technical SystemsAbstract
The cooperative identity offers a normative yardstick for transformative change. It implies the democratic control of technology in transitions for just and sustainable circular economies but does not explicitly deal with technology. Since the choice and development of technology is embedded in socio-technical systems, the autonomous choice and cooperative embedding of technology is therefore in question. We explore this challenge as a question of navigational agency, or the capacity of cooperatives to choose and reform practices, and the technologies they involve, in their deployment of circularity strategies. We propose a novel typology of five stances of cooperatives deploying technology for circular economies: adopting technology, recoding technology and asserting alternative spaces as ideal types on a continuum from exported to self-made technology, complemented by political stances of advocacy and conversion to cooperatives. The typology advances the theoretical exploration of a complex, currently understudied topic, while also practically clarifying expectations regarding cooperatives and their capacity to deploy circularity strategies for transformative change.
References
ALTE (2024). À Propos. https://altecoop.ca/a-propos/
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Pedersen, T. (2001). Subsidiary performance in multinational corporations: The importance of technology embeddedness. International Business Review, 10(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(00)00042-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(00)00042-1
Atelier Paysan. (2021). Reprendre la terre aux machines : manifeste pour une autonomie paysanne et alimentaire. Éditions du Seuil.
Atelier Paysan. (2024). Qui sommes-nous? L’atelier paysan. https://www.latelierpaysan.org/Qui-sommes-nous
Awashish, K. (2022). Modes d’expressions culturelles et pratiques socioéconomique d’autodétermination en coopération autochtone: L’étude de cas par la recherche-action de Coop Nitaskinan. Presented at HEC Montréal, January 27, 2022.
Ballon, J., & Celle, S. (2023). Une lecture mésoéconomique d’écosystèmes coopératifs, comme leviers d’innovation sociale et de changement institutionnel. Revue Interventions économiques. Papers in Political Economy, 69. https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.20404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.20404
Ballon J. & Coquerel J. (2025). What do multi-member cooperatives produce? A comparaison of five business models from the perspective of multifonctionality, SASE Annual Conference, Montréal, 9-12th July 2025.
Ballon J. & Coquerel J. (forthcoming). Commown, ou comment produire du discours et transformer nos usages des appareils électroniques. Enquête sur la multifonctionnalité de cinq coopératives multisociétaires. Cahier du Crises, Montréal.
Becerra, L., & Thomas, H. (2017). Innovation, cooperatives and inclusive development: rethinking technological change and social inclusion. In P. North & M. Cato (Eds.), Towards Just and Sustainable Economies (p. 99-116). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447327257.ch006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447327257-009
Bihouix, P. (2020). The Age of Low Tech: Towards a Technologically Sustainable Civilization. Bristol University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529213263.001.0001
Blackburn, O., Ritala, P., & Keränen, J. (2022). Digital Platforms for the Circular Economy: Exploring Meta-Organizational Orchestration Mechanisms. Organization & Environment, 36(2), 253-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221130717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221130717
Bodet, C., & Lamarche, T. (2020). Des coopératives de travail du 19ème siècle aux CAE et SCIC, les coopératives comme espace méso critique. RECMA, 3(358). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02462804/document DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/recma.358.0072
Bodet, C., Lamarche, T., & Richez-Battesti, N. (2026). Rethinking the Social and Solidarity Economy and Its Potential for Socio-Ecological Transitions : A Mesoeconomic Approach. Revue Interventions Économiques. Papers in Political Economy, (74). https://doi.org/10.4000/15na7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/15na7
Bühler, M. M., Nübel, K., Jelinek, T., Riechert, D., Bauer, T., Schmid, T., & Schneider, M. (2023). Data Cooperatives as a Catalyst for Collaboration, Data Sharing and the Digital Transformation of the Construction Sector. Buildings, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020442
Bunders, D. J., Arets, M., Frenken, K., & De Moor, T. (2022). The feasibility of platform cooperatives in the gig economy. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2022.100167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2022.100167
Calisto Friant, M., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Salomone, R. (2020). A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917
Circle Economy. (2025). Circularity Gap Report 2025: A global call to action. https://www.circularity-gap.world/2025
Chabaud, D. & Germain, O. (2006). La réutilisation de données qualitatives en sciences de gestion : un second choix ? M@n@gement, 9(3), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.093.0199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.093.0199
Claassen, R. (2017). An Agency-Based Capability Theory of Justice. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), 1279-1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12195
Commown (2024, 14 mars). #DomiBD: episode 2. Mastodon. https://mamot.fr/@commownfr/112093007300235653
Coop Carbone (2024). À Propos. https://coopcarbone.coop/a-propos/
CoopCycle (2024). The cooperatives. https://coopcycle.org/cooperatives/
Cornelissen, J. (2017). Editor’s comments: developing propositions, a process model, or a DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0196
typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. The Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1–9.
Cousin, L., & Audebrand, L. (2023). Cooperative associations: frameworks of distributed leadership for collective digital innovation. Innovating in cooperative governance. Governing cooperative innovation, Alliance (ICA) Global and European Cooperative Research Conference, Leuven. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003449850-29
Cousin, L., & Audebrand, L. K. (2026). Le pouvoir des métaorganisations de l’économie sociale et solidaire dans les espaces mésostratégiques. Revue Interventions économiques. Papers in Political Economy, (74). https://doi.org/10.4000/15nae DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/15nae
De Bernardi, C., Corsini, F., Annesi, N., & Frey, M. (2024). Unveiling the Impact of Territorial and Network Embeddedness on Circular Economy Adoption in Cooperatives. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12711
Delbridge, R., & Fiss, P. C. (2013). Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0085
social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 325–331.
Desroche, H. (1976). Le projet coopératif. Les éditions ouvrières.
Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E. S., Ngo, H. T., Guèze, M., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K. A., Butchart, S. H. M., Chan, K. M. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Ichii, K., Liu, J., Subramanian, S. M., Midgley, G. F., Miloslavich, P., Molnár, Z., Obura, D., Pfaff, A.,... Zayas, C. N. (2019). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES. https://zenodo.org/records/3553579
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Draperi, J.-F. (2012). La république coopérative (2nd ed.). Groupe Larcier.
Duroselle, B. (2024). Coop Agri-énergie Warwick. Montréal, TIESS. https://tiess.ca/download/documents/TIESS-TSE-outil-Potrait_AgriEnergie.pdf
Figge, F., Stevenson, A., & Gutberlet, M. (2023). Definitions of the circular economy:
Circularity matters. Ecological Economics, 208(2023), 107823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107823
Fortuny-Sicart, A., Pansera, M., & Lloveras, J. (2024). Directing innovation through confrontation and democratisation: the case of platform cooperativism. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414512
Fuenfschilling, L., & Binz, C. (2018). Global socio-technical regimes. Research Policy, 47(4), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.003
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2010). The Dynamics of Transitions: A Socio-Technical Perspective. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long-Term Transformative Change (p. 11-101). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500357319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500357319
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, M., Hultink, E. (2017). The Circular Economy—A New Sustainability Paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
GICS. (2023). Report on the Global Innovation Coop Summit Workshops. https://portailcoop.hec.ca/notice?id=h%3A%3A2054b588-8e7a-419f-a65f-e0b9171b1cea&queryId=d1d130e2-6511-48f9-a094-ab91f4dd2c45&posInSet=5
Glenn, J. (2013). Cooperatives 2030: Some Factors Impacting the Future of Cooperatives and Business. TULankide: Mondragon Corporation News. https://www.tulankide.com/en/partnerships/cooperatives-2030-some-factors-impacting-the-future-of-cooperatives-and-business
Guerreschi, A. & Zecca, E. (2025). Green coops: Drivers of innovation for circular strategies among Italian cooperatives. Ecological Economics, 227, 108432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108432
Gutberlet, J. (2023). Grassroots eco-social innovations driving inclusive circular economy. Detritus – Multidiscip. J. Waste Resour. Residues 22, 3–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2023.17252
Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2017). Social Innovation and Human Development—How the Capabilities Approach and Social Innovation Theory Mutually Support Each Other. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2), 163–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1251401
Huybrechts, B., & Haugh, H. (2018). The Roles of Networks in Institutionalizing New Hybrid Organizational Forms : Insights from the European Renewable Energy Cooperative Network. Organization Studies, 39(8), 1085 1108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717097
ICA. (n.d.). What is a cooperative? https://ica.coop/en/cooperatives/what-is-a-cooperative
Jagou, S. (2021). Transitioning to a circular economy: learning from the Quebec experience 2014–2020. Québec Circulaire & Smart Prosperity Institute. https://www.quebeccirculaire.org/data/sources/users/5777/20210519201748-quebec-circulairecereportfinalmay192021tiny.pdf
Janelle, K., & Ziegler. R. (forthcoming). In search of transformative impact: a framework of strategic trajectories for renewable energy communities. In J. Stambouli, S. Baba & S. Kouamé (Eds.), Managing Nonprofit Strategic Tensions: Impact, Scaling and Sustainability. Springer.
Kemp, R. (2010). Eco-Innovation, Measurement and Open Research Issues. Economic politica, 3, 397-420.
Kirchherr, J., N. Yang, F. Schulze-Spüntrup, M. Heerink, & Hartley, K. (2023). Conceptualizing the Circular Economy (Revisited): An Analysis of 221 Definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001
Labrousse, A. (2006). Éléments pour un institutionnalisme méthodologique : autonomie, variation d’échelle, réfléxivité et abduction. Économie et institution, (8), 5–53. https://doi.org/10.4000/ei.1107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ei.1107
Lamarche, T., & Richez-Battesti, N. (2023). Produire est politique : Les coopératives, levier de transformation. Revue de la régulation. Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, (34). https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.22341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.22341
Lévesque, B. (2016). Économie sociale et solidaire et entrepreneur social : Vers quels nouveaux écosystèmes ? Revue Interventions économiques, (54) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.2802
Maldonado-Mariscal, K., & Hölsgens, R. (2024). Reimagining innovation pathways: exnovation and Buen Vivir as Global North–South dialogues. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414510
Manda, J., Khonje, M. G., Alene, A. D., Tufa, A. H., Abdoulaye, T., Mutenje, M., Setimela, P., & Manyong, V. (2020). Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120160
Mazzanti, M. & Zecca, E. (2023). Industry, innovations and transitions to the green and circular economy. In Handbook of Industrial Development, edited by P. Bianchi, S. Labory and P. Tomlinson, 302-320. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800379091.00028
Micheaux, H., Erohina, D., & Montliaud, M. (2024). Bridging the skills gap to empower the social economy and to boost circular economy. International Social Innovation Research Conference, Bern, Switzerland. https://hal.science/hal-04599588v1
Miller, E. M., Patala, S., & Ovaska, J.-P. (2025). Forging the Future: Reconfiguring Value Chains Through Circular Economy Meta-Organizing. Organization & Environment, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266241297340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266241297340
Montagut, A. (2025). Mettre en partage téléphones et ordinateurs : La voie de Commown vers la sobriété numérique. Les Carnets de l’École de Paris du management, 2(2), 1 12. https://doi.org/10.3917/cepm.002.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cepm.002.0001
Moreau, V., Sahakian, M., van Griethuysen, P., & F. Vuille (2017). Coming full circle: why social and institutional dimensions matter for the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology,21(3), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598
Novkovic, S. (2008). Defining the co-operative difference. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2168–2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.02.009
Novkovic, S. (2022). Cooperative identity as a yardstick for transformative change. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 93(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12362
OECD. (2022). Policy Brief on Making the Most of the Social Economy’s Contribution to the Circular Economy. Available online from OECD.
Pansera, M., Barca, S., Martinez Alvarez, B., Leonardi, E., D’Alisa, G., Meira, T., & Guillibert, P. (2024). Toward a just circular economy: Conceptualizing environmental labor and gender justice in circularity studies. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2024.2338592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2024.2338592
Pel, B., Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., Loorbach, D., & de Geus, T. (2023). How to account for the dark sides of social innovation? Transitions directionality in renewable energy prosumerism. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100775
Popper, R. (2008). How are foresight methods selected? Foresight, 10(6), 62–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810918586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810918586
Poullot, L. (2025. Cultiver autrement avec l’Atelier Paysan: Une analyse d’outils et de pratiques low-tech par une coopérative en économie circulaire. Projet d’intégration, HEC Montréal.
PortailCoop (n.d.). The Circular Economy Collection. https://portailcoop.hec.ca/collections/collection-circular-economy
Pozzebon, M., Tello-Rozas, S., & Heck, I. (2021). Nourishing the Social Innovation Debate with the “Social Technology” South American Research Tradition. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(3), 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00314-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00314-0
Qureshi, I., Bhatt, B., Parthiban, R., Sun, R., Shukla, D. M., Hota, P. K., & Xu, Z. (2022). Knowledge Commoning: Scaffolding and Technoficing to Overcome Challenges of Knowledge Curation. Information and Organization, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100410
Raymond, R. (2022). Electric co-ops are well situated to lead the green energy transition, report finds. Resilience. https://www.resilience.org/stories/2022-06-02/electric-co-ops-are-well-situated-to-lead-the-green-energy-transition-report-finds/
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European journal of social theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
REScoop. (2025). REScoop European federation of energy communities. https://www.rescoop.eu/
RRECQ (Réseau de recherche en économie circulaire du Québec) (2025). Feuille de route pour la transition vers une économie circulaire de la société québécoise 2025 –2050? Avalable online RRECQ
Richez-Battesti, N., Petrella, F., & Vallade, D. (2012). L’innovation sociale, une notion aux usages pluriels : Quels enjeux et défis pour l’analyse ? Innovations, 2(38), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.3917/inno.038.0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/inno.038.0015
Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technologisa change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (es.), Human Choice and Climat Change: Vol. II, Ressources and Technology (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press.
Rousselière, D., Bouchard, M. J., & Rousselière, S. (2024). How does the social economy contribute to social and environmental innovation? Evidence of direct and indirect effects from a European survey. Research Policy, 53(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104991
Scholz, T. (2023). Own This. How Platform Cooperatives Help Workers Build a Democratic Internet. Verso.
Schröder, P., Lemille, A., & Desmond, P. (2020). Making the circular economy work for human development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104686
Shove, E., & Pantzar, M. (2005). Consumers, producers and practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of consumer culture, 5(1), 43–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505049846
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655
Spear, R. (2011). Formes coopératives hybrides. Revue internationale de l’économie sociale, 2(320), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.7202/1020906ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1020906ar
Spinosa, C., Flores, F., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1997). Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action and the Cultivation of Solidarity. MIT Press.
Stirling, A. (2024). Responsibility and the hidden politics of directionality: opening up ‘innovation democracies’ for sustainability transformations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2370082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2370082
Unión Solidaria de Trabajadores (UST). (2024). https://cooperativaust.com.ar/wp/institucional/
Van Opstal, W., Borms, L., Brusselaers, J., Bocken, N., Pals, E., & Dams, Y. (2024). Towards sustainable growth paths for work integration social enterprises in the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143296
Van Opstal, Wim, Bocken, N., & Brusselaers, J. (2025). Cooperating for circularity? Perspectives of citizen energy cooperative members on circular solar business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144653
Vézina, M. (2016). L’entreprise collective, un véhicule d’innovation sociale. In L’économie circulaire – Une transition incontournable, edited by S. Sauvé, D. Normandin, and M. McDonald, 112–116. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Vieta, M. (2020). Worker’s self-management in Argentina. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004268951
Vieta, M., Charbonneau, J., & Duguid, F. (2024). Business conversion to Co-operatives in Canada: a Landscape report (Co-op Convert Report, no. 3). University of Toronto. https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/29bbb29f-b987-4e49-9a45-2f11e07a356f/content
Von Jacobi, N., Chiappero-Martinetti, E., Ziegler, R., van der Linden, M. & van Beers, C. (2019). “Social Innovation and Agency.” In Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation, edited by A. Nicholls and R. Ziegler, 245–267. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830511.003.0010
Welch, D., & Warde, A. (2015). Theories of Practice and Sustainable Consumption. In Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption, edited by Reisch, L and J. Thøgersen. EE Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471270.00013
Welch, D., & Yates, L. (2018). The practices of collective action: Practice theory, sustainability transitions and social change. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(3), 288-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12168
Wossen, T., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A., Haile, M. G., Feleke, S., Olanrewaju, A., & Manyong, V. (2017). Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022
Young, C. (2021). The Iron Cage has a Mezzanine: Collectivist democratic organizations and the selection of isomorphic pressures via meta-organization. In K. Chen & V. Chen (Eds.), Organizational Imaginaries Tempering Capitalism and Tending to Communities through Cooperatives and Collectivist Democracy (vol. 72, p. 113-139). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20210000072005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20210000072005
Zhang, S., Sun, Z., Ma, W., & Valentinov, V. (2020). The effect of cooperative membership on agricultural technology adoption in Sichuan, China. China Economic Review, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101334
Ziegler, R. (2020). Innovation, Ethics and our Common Futures. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789904543
Ziegler, R., Bauwens, T., Roy, M. J., Teasdale, S., Fourrier, A., & Raufflet, E. (2023a). Embedding circularity: Theorizing the social economy, its potential, and its challenges. Ecological Economics, 214 (December), 107970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107970
Ziegler, R., Poirier, C., Lacasse, M., & Murray, E. (2023b). Circular Economy and Cooperatives—An Exploratory Survey. Sustainability, 15(3), 2530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032530
Ziegler, R., J. Rey-Sierro, S. Novkovic, Buendía-Martínez, I., Ballon, J., Teasdale, S. & Roy, M. (2025). How Cooperatives Embed Circularity in Their Business Models and Governance—Results From an International Survey. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70045
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The articles review for this article are available from PortailCoop. For further information see the appendix of the article.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rafael Ziegler, Justine Ballon, Rick Hölsgens, Karina Maldonado-Mariscal (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Grant numbers 890-2022-0023