The Journey of a Norwegian T-shirt: A Case Study of Fibre Material in the Clothing System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/joce-2026-41250Keywords:
Textiles, Clothing Industry , Pre-consumer Waste , Recycling , Life Cycle Assessment , Material Flow Modelling, Eco-design , Design for Circularity, Waste Minimization , ManufacturingAbstract
Current EU textile policy efforts largely focus on post-consumer waste collection and end-of-life management while pre-consumer losses remain insufficiently addressed. In addition, many textile life cycle assessments (LCAs) and material flow studies apply single-lifecycle boundaries with conventional allocation approaches and consumer-country perspectives. This limits the understanding of the potential for fibre retention across consecutive lifecycles and global value chains.
This study quantifies fibre flows and environmental performance of a cotton t-shirt across two consecutive lifecycles (loops) by combining material flow model with LCA for five impact categories (global warming, freshwater eutrophication and ecotoxicity, water consumption and land use). The model represents manufacturing in Bangladesh and use and end-of-life management in Norway as EU-relevant benchmark context.
Results show that, under current conditions, a maximum of 17% of the initial fibre input could be mechanically recycled and reutilized into a new T-shirt. It is also revealed that fibre losses occur predominantly in upstream operations: an estimated 44% of material was lost during the manufacturing stages. Scenarios analysis demonstrated that recycling pre-consumer waste could increase material recovery to up to 44%, while improving process efficiency (reducing waste generation) in yarn, wet processing and apparel production could reduce the global warming by 10% and other impacts by 20-25%. These findings suggest that meeting EU circular textile ambitions requires prioritizing upstream material efficiency and pre-consumer waste management, supported by coordinated action across policymakers, brands and manufacturers along the value chain.
References
Ahmed, R. (2024). Sustainable Clothing Systems: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of
T-Shirts Made from Primary and Recycled Materials [Master’s Thesis, Norwegian
University of Science and Technology (NTNU)].
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3148706
Akter, M. Md. K., Haq, U. N., Islam, Md. M., & Uddin, M. A. (2022). Textile-apparel
manufacturing and material waste management in the circular economy: A
conceptual model to achieve sustainable development goal (SDG) 12 for
Bangladesh. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 4, 100070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2022.100070
Alam, M. A. A., Biswas, M. K., Mahiat, T., Chowdhury, R. B., Biswas, K. F., Hossain, M. M., &
Sujauddin, M. (2023). Taking stock of the share of global environmental burden of
knitwear production in Bangladesh: Constructing the life cycle inventory. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 412, 137376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137376
Anas, M. S., Faheem, M., & Mikucioniene, D. (2025). Challenges and Limitations in
Recycling of Post-Consumer Cotton Denim Waste into New Textiles. Journal of
Natural Fibers, 22(1), 2570080. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2025.2570080
Arafat, Y., & Uddin, A. J. (2022). Recycled fibers from pre- and post-consumer textile waste
as blend constituents in manufacturing 100% cotton yarns in ring spinning: A
sustainable and eco-friendly approach. Heliyon, 8(11), Article 11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11275
Battery Pass consortium. (2023). Comparison of end-of-life allocation approaches: An
analysis complementing the Battery Pass Rules for calculating the Carbon Footprint
of the ‘End-of-life and recycling’ life cycle stage (Version 1.1).
https://thebatterypass.eu/assets/images/content-
guidance/pdf/2023_Battery_Passport_EOL_Analysis.pdf
Brunner, P., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical handbook of material flow analysis. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203507209
New York: Lewis, 317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0174-9
CBI, Government of Netherlands. (2024, October 10). The European market potential for
sustainable materials | CBI. https://www.cbi.eu/market-
information/apparel/sustainable-materials/market-potential
Çelik, H. I., Çoban, Ö., & Sarioğlu, E. (2022). Yarn quality investigation of compact cotton
yarns with different combing noil percentage. The International Journal of Materials
and Engineering Technology (TIJMET), 2022, 5(2): 107-111.
Dahlbo, H., Aalto, K., Eskelinen, H., & Salmenperä, H. (2017). Increasing textile
circulation—Consequences and requirements. Sustainable Production and
Consumption, 9, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.06.005
Dahlbo, H., Rautiainen, A., Savolainen, H., Oksanen, P., Nurmi, P., Virta, M., & Pokela, O.
(2021). Textile flows in Finland 2019. Turun Ammattikorkeakoulu.
https://www.turkuamk.fi/fi/tutkimus-kehitys-ja-innovaatiot/julkaisuhaku/140/
Dahlbom, M., & Martvall, A. (2025). Maturity of fibre-to-fibre recycling in Europe—
Assessment of recycling companies in Europe (No. C874). IVL Swedish
Environmental Research Institute. https://ivl.diva-
portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1933003/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Das, N. K., Chakrabartty, J., Dey, M., Gupta, A. K. S., & Matin, M. A. (2020). Present energy
scenario and future energy mix of Bangladesh. Energy Strategy Reviews, 32, 100576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100576
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100576
Dinita Setyawati, Shabrina Nadhila, & Rini Sucahyo. (2024). Vietnam—Energy Trends.
Ember. https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/viet-nam
Ekvall, T., Björklund, A., Sandin, G., Lagergren, J., & Rydberg, M. (2020). Modeling recycling
in life cycle assessment (2020:05). IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning fashion’s future.
https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/a-new-textiles-economy
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2024). Pushing the boundaries of EPR policy for textiles: The
Netherlands factsheet. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/epr-for-textiles-
in-the-netherlands
Esteve-Turrillas, F. A., & de la Guardia, M. (2017). Environmental impact of Recover cotton in DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.034
textile industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 116, 107–115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.034
European commission. (2023). Waste Framework Directive.
https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/waste-framework-
directive_en
European Commission. (2024, June 13). Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation.
https://commission.europa.eu/energy-climate-change-environment/standards-
tools-and-labels/products-labelling-rules-and-requirements/ecodesign-
sustainable-products-regulation_en
European Environment Agency. (2024). Management of used and waste textiles in Europe’s
circular economy—European Environment Agency [Briefing].
https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/management-of-used-and-waste-textiles
European Environment Agency. (2025a, March 26). Consumption of clothing, footwear,
other textiles in the EU reaches new record high.
https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/newsroom/news/consumption-of-clothing-footwear-
other-textiles-in-the-eu-reaches-new-record-high
European Environment Agency. (2025b, May 2). Textiles.
https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/textiles
Global Fashion Agenda. (2024). Renewable Energy Initiative. Global Fashion Agenda.
https://globalfashionagenda.org/renewable-energy-initiative/
Granello, S., Jönbrink, A., Roos, S., Johansson, T., & Granberg, H. (2015). Consumer
behaviour on washing. Mistra Future Fashion: Stockholm, Sweden.
Gwozdz, W., Netter, S., Bjartmarz, T., & Reisch, L. A. (2013). Survey results on fashion
consumption and sustainability among young Swedes. Mistra future fashion.
Hausman, D. M. (Ed.). (2008). The philosophy of economics: An anthology (3rd ed). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025
Cambridge University Press.
ICED, NITI. (2025, July). India’s Power Sector | Capacity & Generation Mix.
https://iced.niti.gov.in/energy/electricity/generation
ISO. (2006). ISO 14040:2006(en), Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—
Principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14040:ed-2:v1:en
Juanga-Labayen, J. P., Labayen, I. V., & Yuan, Q. (2022). A Review on Textile Recycling
Practices and Challenges. Textiles, 2(1), Article 1.
https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2010010
Koligkioni, A., Parajuly, K., Sørensen, B. L., & Cimpan, C. (2018). Environmental Assessment
of End-of-Life Textiles in Denmark. Procedia CIRP, 69, 962–967.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.090
Lausselet, C., Cherubini, F., Del Alamo Serrano, G., Becidan, M., & Strømman, A. H. (2016).
Life-cycle assessment of a Waste-to-Energy plant in central Norway: Current
situation and effects of changes in waste fraction composition. Waste Management,
58, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.014
Marc, J. (2023, August 10). Kantamanto market: At one of the world’s largest clothing
dumps, textiles are getting a new lease of life. CNN.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/10/africa/kantamanto-textile-market-ghana-or-
foundation-spc-intl
Maria, G. (2021). Environmental and Waste Management in the Garment Industry in the
Republic of Moldova. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering.
https://globaljournals.org/GJRE_Volume21/1-Environmental-and-Waste-
Management.pdf
McKinsey & Company. (2022). Scaling textile recycling in Europe—Turning waste into value.
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/scaling-textile-recycling-
in-europe-turning-waste-into-value
Millward-Hopkins, J., Purnell, P., & Baurley, S. (2023). A material flow analysis of the UK
clothing economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 407, 137158.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137158
Moazzem, S., Wang, L., Daver, F., & Crossin, E. (2021). Environmental impact of discarded
apparel landfilling and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 166,
105338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105338
Mora-Sojo, M. C., Krych, K., & Pettersen, J. B. (2023). Evaluating the current Norwegian
clothing system and a circular alternative. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,
197, 107109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107109
Muyi Yang & Shiyao Zhang. (2024). China—Energy Trends. Ember. https://ember-
energy.org/countries-and-regions/china
Norsk Tekstilgjenvinning. (2024). Material recycling of textiles.
https://www.ntgas.no/en/materialgjenvinning
Nørup, N., Pihl, K., Damgaard, A., & Scheutz, C. (2019). Evaluation of a European textile
sorting centre: Material flow analysis and life cycle inventory. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling, 143, 310–319.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.010
OEC. (2023). Knit T-shirts (HS: 6109) Product Trade, Exporters and Importers. OEC World.
https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/knit-t-shirts
Rahman, S., & Uddin, A. J. (2022). Unusable cotton spinning mill waste: A viable source of DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4062975
raw material in paper making. Heliyon, 8(8), e10055.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10055
RecoverTM. (2023, August 4). The rapid growth of the RecoverTM factory in Bangladesh.
https://recoverfiber.com/newsroom/rapid-growth-rbd-fibers-ltd
Šajn, N. (2022). Textiles and the environment (PE 729.405). EPRS | European Parliamentary
Research Service.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/729405/EPRS_BRI(202
2)729405_EN.pdf
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266
review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266
Sandin, G., Roos, S., Spak, B., Zamani, B., & Peters, G. (2019). Environmental assessment of
Swedish clothing consumption – six garments, sustainable futures.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30502.27205
Schmidt, A., Watson, D., Roos, S., Askham, C., & Poulsen, P. B. (2016). Gaining benefits
from discarded textiles. Nordic Council of Ministers.
https://doi.org/10.6027/TN2016-537
Simas, M. S., & Arega, M. A. (2025). From local strategies to global sustainability: A
macroeconomic analysis of Extended Producer Responsibility scenarios for the
Norwegian consumer textiles sector. SINTEF Industri.
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3188883
Sun, G., Cao, X., Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Chen, Q. (2024). Comparative life cycle assessment of
two different waste materials for recycled fiber. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling, 205, 107518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107518
SWITCH2CE. (2023, September 5). UNIDO inaugurates Switch to Circular Economy Value
Chains project with a series of events with government and private sector partners in
Bangladesh | SwitchToCircular.eu. https://www.switchtocircular.eu/news-and-
events/unido-inaugurates-switch-circular-economy-value-chains-project-series-
events
The Centre for Child Rights and Business. (2024). Child rights and informal textile waste
recycling in Bangladesh.
https://www.unicef.org/childrightsandbusiness/media/1196/file/SupplementaryRep
ort-ChildRights-Textile-Waste-Recycling-Bangladesh-2024.pdf
The Independent. (2022, July 27). Mountains of clothes washed up on Ghana beach show
cost of fast fashion. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-
change/news/fast-fashion-ghana-clothes-waste-b2132399.html
Watson, D., Trzepacz, S., Rubach, S., & Johnsen, F. M. (2020). Kartlegging av brukte tekstiler
og tekstilavfall i Norge. Norsus. https://norsus.no/publikasjon/kartlegging-av-brukte-
tekstiler-og-tekstilavfall-i-norge/
World Trade Organization. (2022). World Trade Organization—Global Value Chains—Global
Value Chain (GVC) Sectoral Profiles.
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/miwi_e/sectoral_profiles_e.htm
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the article.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rakib Ahmed, Christina Meskers, Johan Berg Pettersen (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.