Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Technologies for a Circular Economy: Insights from the Manufacturing Industry

Lydia Bühler; Tassilo Schuster; Lara Schmidt; Alexander Pflaum

doi:10.55845/YXFI4033

Authors

Lydia Bühler Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (IIS) / Division Supply Chain Services Author
Tassilo Schuster Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (IIS) / Division Supply Chain Services; Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences (HNU) / Business and Economics Author
Lara Schmidt Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (IIS) / Division Supply Chain Services Author
Alexander Pflaum University of Bamberg / Chair for Supply Chain Management Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55845/YXFI4033

Keywords:

Circular Economy, Digital Technologies, Industry 4.0, Twin Transformation, Barriers, Qualitative Research

Abstract

Academics, industry representatives, and policymakers widely recognize that adopting digital technologies is essential for successfully implementing circular economy solutions in manufacturing companies. However, many organizations still struggle to adopt these technologies effectively to achieve circularity. This study identifies and examines the barriers manufacturing companies encounter when leveraging digital technologies and data to implement circular economy solutions. Based on insights from 61 experts, the study provides robust empirical evidence on the barriers these companies face in transitioning to a smart circular economy. By offering an in-depth analysis of 13 distinct barrier dimensions, grouped into five broader themes embedded in the Natural Resource-Based View, this study presents a comprehensive framework. This framework deepens our understanding of the specific barriers impeding the transition to a smart circular economy, while identifying areas that demand targeted interventions.

References

Alcayaga, A., & Hansen, E. G. (2025). Smart circular economy as a service business model: An activity system framework and research agenda. R&D Management, 55(2), 508–530.

Bag, S., Sahu, A. K., Kilbourn, P., Pisa, N., Dhamija, P., & Sahu, A. K. (2022). Modeling barriers of digital manufacturing in a circular economy for enhancing sustainability. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), 833–869.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Breiter, K., Crome, C., Oberländer, A. M., & Schnaak, F. (2024). Dynamic capabilities for the twin transformation climb: A capability maturity model. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(1), 2205–2226.

Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Parida, V. (2022). Towards the smart circular economy paradigm: A definition, conceptualization, and research agenda. Sustainability, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094960

Bühler, L., Schuster, T., & Pflaum, A. (2025). Twin transformation—The case of smart circular economy in manufacturing industries: Insights from an umbrella review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 29(5–6), 2540007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919625400079

Chaudhuri, A., Subramanian, N., & Dora, M. (2022). Circular economy and digital capabilities of SMEs: Combined resource-based view and ambidexterity perspective. Journal of Business Research, 142, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.039

Chhabra, D., & Singh, R. (2024). Analyzing barriers to green logistics in context of circular economy and Industry 4.0 in the Indian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 27(11), 1939–1952.

Christmann, A.-S., Crome, C., Graf-Drasch, V., Oberländer, A. M., & Schmidt, L. (2024). The twin transformation butterfly: Capabilities for an integrated digital and sustainability transformation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(4), 489–505.

Coppola, C., Vollero, A., & Siano, A. (2023). Developing dynamic capabilities for the circular economy in the textile and clothing industry in Italy: A natural-resource-based view. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4798–4820. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3394

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

Denu, M., David, P., Landry, A., & Mangione, F. (2023). Exploring opportunities and barriers of digital technologies in circular manufacturing systems: An overview and a research roadmap. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 43, 400–421.

Galvão, G. D. A., Evans, S., Ferrer, P. S. S., & Carvalho, M. M. (2022). Circular business model: Breaking down barriers towards sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1504–1524.

Gartner. (2020). Gartner survey shows 70% of supply chain leaders plan to invest in the circular economy. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2020-02-26-gartner-survey-shows-70–of-supply-chain-leaders-plan

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151

Halse, L. L., & Jæger, B. (2019). Operationalizing Industry 4.0: Understanding barriers of Industry 4.0 and circular economy. In F. Ameri et al. (Eds.), IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (pp. 135–142). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29996-5_16

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.

Hatzivasilis, G., Soultatos, O., Ioannidis, S., Verikoukis, C., Demetriou, G., & Tsatsoulis, C. (2019). Review of security and privacy for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). In 2019 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (pp. 457–464). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DCOSS.2019.00091

Hettiarachchi, B. D., Sudusinghe, J. I., Seuring, S., & Brandenburg, M. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for implementing additive manufacturing supply chains in circular economy. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 1153–1158.

Hopkinson, P., Zils, M., Hawkins, P., & Roper, S. (2018). Managing a complex global circular economy business model: Opportunities and challenges. California Management Review, 60(3), 71–94.

Kristoffersen, E., Blomsma, F., Mikalef, P., & Li, J. (2020). The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 120, 241–261.

Kumar, N. M., & Chopra, S. S. (2022). Leveraging blockchain and smart contract technologies to overcome circular economy implementation challenges. Sustainability, 14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159492

Kvale, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE.

Leal, G. G., Castro Vila, R. de, Dorado, A. B., & Jäger, A. (2025). Circular economy adoption in manufacturing firms: Evidence from Germany. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(2), 1574–1589.

Liu, Q., Trevisan, A. H., Yang, M., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). A framework of digital technologies for the circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 1–22.

Lobo, A., Trevisan, A. H., Liu, Q., Yang, M., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). Barriers to transitioning towards smart circular economy: A systematic literature review. In S. G. Scholz (Ed.), Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6128-0_24

Mäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Damman, S., & Wardeberg, M. (2023). Digital innovation’s contribution to sustainability transitions. Technology in Society, 73, 102255.

Mishra, R., Singh, R. K., & Rana, N. P. (2024). Digital orientation, digital eco-innovation and circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 2752–2770.

Neri, A., Cagno, E., Susur, E., Urueña, A., Nuur, C., Kumar, V., Franchi, S., & Sorrentino, C. (2024). The relationship between digital technologies and the circular economy. R&D Management, 55(3), 617–713.

Neri, A., Negri, M., Cagno, E., Kumar, V., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2023). Digital-enabled dynamic capabilities supporting the circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 5083–5101.

Okorie, O., & Russell, J. D. (2022). Exploring the risks of blockchain and circular economy initiatives in food supply chains. In S. G. Scholz (Ed.), Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (Vol. 262, pp. 290–303). Springer.

Ozkan-Ozen, Y. D., Kazancoglu, Y., & Mangla, S. K. (2020). Synchronized barriers for circular supply chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104986.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42, 533–544.

Papert, M., Hamper, A., Zimmermann-Hoßbach, N., Schuster, T., Bühler, L., & Pflaum, A. (2024). Towards the data-driven circular and embedded supply chain. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Pigosso, D. C., & McAloone, T. C. (2021). Transitioning to a circular economy: A readiness self-assessment tool. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 346–358.

Rehman, S. U., Giordino, D., Zhang, Q., & Alam, G. M. (2023). Twin transitions & Industry 4.0. Technology in Society, 73, 102227.

Rejeb, A., Appolloni, A., Rejeb, K., Treiblmaier, H., Iranmanesh, M., & Keogh, J. G. (2023). The role of blockchain technology in the transition toward the circular economy. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200126

Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2019). Towards circular business models: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117696.

Samadhiya, A., Agrawal, R., Kumar, A., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2023). Blockchain technology and circular economy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(2), 293–314.

Schallmo, D., Kolb, J., Schuster, T., Athanassopoulou, N., & Sepetis, A. (2025). Twin transformation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 29(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919625010017

Scheel, C., Aguiñaga, E., & Bello, B. (2020). Decoupling economic development from finite resources. Sustainability, 12(4), 1291.

Schöggl, J.-P., Stumpf, L., & Baumgartner, R. (2024). Interorganizational collaboration and digital technologies in circular economy implementation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 2225–2249.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. SAGE.

Stucki, T., Woerter, M., & Loumeau, N. (2023). Measuring circular economy transition at company level. Journal of Environmental Management, 326, 116749.

Takacs, F., Brunner, D., & Frankenberger, K. (2022). Barriers to a circular economy in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 132227.

Thirumal, S., Udawatta, N., Karunasena, G., & Al-Ameri, R. (2024). Barriers to adopting digital technologies for circular economy in construction. Sustainability, 16(8).

Trevisan, A. H., Castro, C. G., Gomes, L., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). Unlocking the circular ecosystem concept. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 286–298.

Trevisan, A. H., Lobo, A., Guzzo, D., Gomes, L. A. V., & Mascarenhas, J. (2023). Barriers to employing digital technologies for a circular economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, 117437.

Trevisan, A. H., Zacharias, I. S., Liu, Q., Yang, M., & Mascarenhas, J. (2021). Circular economy and digital technologies: A review. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 621–630.

Uhrenholt, J. N., Kristensen, J. H., Adamsen, S., Jensen, S. F., Colli, M., & Waehrens, B. V. (2022). Twin transition: Synergies between circular economy and IoT. Journal of Circular Economy, 1(1), 1–19.

Väisänen, J.-M., Ranta, V., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2019). Enabling circular economy with software. In Software Business: ICSOB 2019 (pp. 252–259). Springer.

Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.