Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Technologies for a Circular Economy: Insights from the Manufacturing Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/YXFI4033Keywords:
Circular Economy, Digital Technologies, Industry 4.0, Twin Transformation, Barriers, Qualitative ResearchAbstract
Academics, industry representatives, and policymakers widely recognize that adopting digital technologies is essential for successfully implementing circular economy solutions in manufacturing companies. However, many organizations still struggle to adopt these technologies effectively to achieve circularity. This study identifies and examines the barriers manufacturing companies encounter when leveraging digital technologies and data to implement circular economy solutions. Based on insights from 61 experts, the study provides robust empirical evidence on the barriers these companies face in transitioning to a smart circular economy. By offering an in-depth analysis of 13 distinct barrier dimensions, grouped into five broader themes embedded in the Natural Resource-Based View, this study presents a comprehensive framework. This framework deepens our understanding of the specific barriers impeding the transition to a smart circular economy, while identifying areas that demand targeted interventions.
References
Alcayaga, A., & Hansen, E. G. (2025). Smart circular economy as a service business model: An activity system framework and research agenda. R&D Management, 55(2), 508–530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12707
Bag, S., Sahu, A. K., Kilbourn, P., Pisa, N., Dhamija, P., & Sahu, A. K. (2022). Modeling barriers of digital manufacturing in a circular economy for enhancing sustainability. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), 833–869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0637
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Breiter, K., Crome, C., Oberländer, A. M., & Schnaak, F. (2024). Dynamic capabilities for the twin transformation climb: A capability maturity model. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(1), 2205–2226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10520-y
Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Parida, V. (2022). Towards the smart circular economy paradigm: A definition, conceptualization, and research agenda. Sustainability, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094960
Bühler, L., Schuster, T., & Pflaum, A. (2025). Twin transformation—The case of smart circular economy in manufacturing industries: Insights from an umbrella review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 29(5–6), 2540007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919625400079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919625400079
Chaudhuri, A., Subramanian, N., & Dora, M. (2022). Circular economy and digital capabilities of SMEs: Combined resource-based view and ambidexterity perspective. Journal of Business Research, 142, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.039
Chhabra, D., & Singh, R. (2024). Analyzing barriers to green logistics in context of circular economy and Industry 4.0 in the Indian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 27(11), 1939–1952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2022.2134847
Christmann, A.-S., Crome, C., Graf-Drasch, V., Oberländer, A. M., & Schmidt, L. (2024). The twin transformation butterfly: Capabilities for an integrated digital and sustainability transformation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(4), 489–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00847-2
Coppola, C., Vollero, A., & Siano, A. (2023). Developing dynamic capabilities for the circular economy in the textile and clothing industry in Italy: A natural-resource-based view. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4798–4820. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3394
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
Denu, M., David, P., Landry, A., & Mangione, F. (2023). Exploring opportunities and barriers of digital technologies in circular manufacturing systems: An overview and a research roadmap. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 43, 400–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.11.015
Galvão, G. D. A., Evans, S., Ferrer, P. S. S., & Carvalho, M. M. (2022). Circular business model: Breaking down barriers towards sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1504–1524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2966
Gartner. (2020). Gartner survey shows 70% of supply chain leaders plan to invest in the circular economy. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2020-02-26-gartner-survey-shows-70–of-supply-chain-leaders-plan
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Halse, L. L., & Jæger, B. (2019). Operationalizing Industry 4.0: Understanding barriers of Industry 4.0 and circular economy. In F. Ameri et al. (Eds.), IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (pp. 135–142). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29996-5_16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29996-5_16
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
Hatzivasilis, G., Soultatos, O., Ioannidis, S., Verikoukis, C., Demetriou, G., & Tsatsoulis, C. (2019). Review of security and privacy for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). In 2019 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (pp. 457–464). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DCOSS.2019.00091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DCOSS.2019.00091
Hettiarachchi, B. D., Sudusinghe, J. I., Seuring, S., & Brandenburg, M. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for implementing additive manufacturing supply chains in circular economy. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 1153–1158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.545
Hopkinson, P., Zils, M., Hawkins, P., & Roper, S. (2018). Managing a complex global circular economy business model: Opportunities and challenges. California Management Review, 60(3), 71–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618764692
Kristoffersen, E., Blomsma, F., Mikalef, P., & Li, J. (2020). The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 120, 241–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044
Kumar, N. M., & Chopra, S. S. (2022). Leveraging blockchain and smart contract technologies to overcome circular economy implementation challenges. Sustainability, 14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159492
Kvale, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE.
Leal, G. G., Castro Vila, R. de, Dorado, A. B., & Jäger, A. (2025). Circular economy adoption in manufacturing firms: Evidence from Germany. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(2), 1574–1589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4064
Liu, Q., Trevisan, A. H., Yang, M., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). A framework of digital technologies for the circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3015
Lobo, A., Trevisan, A. H., Liu, Q., Yang, M., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). Barriers to transitioning towards smart circular economy: A systematic literature review. In S. G. Scholz (Ed.), Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6128-0_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6128-0_24
Mäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Damman, S., & Wardeberg, M. (2023). Digital innovation’s contribution to sustainability transitions. Technology in Society, 73, 102255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102255
Mishra, R., Singh, R. K., & Rana, N. P. (2024). Digital orientation, digital eco-innovation and circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 2752–2770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3619
Neri, A., Cagno, E., Susur, E., Urueña, A., Nuur, C., Kumar, V., Franchi, S., & Sorrentino, C. (2024). The relationship between digital technologies and the circular economy. R&D Management, 55(3), 617–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12715
Neri, A., Negri, M., Cagno, E., Kumar, V., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2023). Digital-enabled dynamic capabilities supporting the circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 5083–5101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3409
Okorie, O., & Russell, J. D. (2022). Exploring the risks of blockchain and circular economy initiatives in food supply chains. In S. G. Scholz (Ed.), Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (Vol. 262, pp. 290–303). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6128-0_28
Ozkan-Ozen, Y. D., Kazancoglu, Y., & Mangla, S. K. (2020). Synchronized barriers for circular supply chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104986
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42, 533–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Papert, M., Hamper, A., Zimmermann-Hoßbach, N., Schuster, T., Bühler, L., & Pflaum, A. (2024). Towards the data-driven circular and embedded supply chain. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2024.596
Pigosso, D. C., & McAloone, T. C. (2021). Transitioning to a circular economy: A readiness self-assessment tool. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 346–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.011
Rehman, S. U., Giordino, D., Zhang, Q., & Alam, G. M. (2023). Twin transitions & Industry 4.0. Technology in Society, 73, 102227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102227
Rejeb, A., Appolloni, A., Rejeb, K., Treiblmaier, H., Iranmanesh, M., & Keogh, J. G. (2023). The role of blockchain technology in the transition toward the circular economy. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200126
Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2019). Towards circular business models: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117696
Samadhiya, A., Agrawal, R., Kumar, A., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2023). Blockchain technology and circular economy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(2), 293–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2022-0299
Schallmo, D., Kolb, J., Schuster, T., Athanassopoulou, N., & Sepetis, A. (2025). Twin transformation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 29(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919625010017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919625010017
Scheel, C., Aguiñaga, E., & Bello, B. (2020). Decoupling economic development from finite resources. Sustainability, 12(4), 1291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041291
Schöggl, J.-P., Stumpf, L., & Baumgartner, R. (2024). Interorganizational collaboration and digital technologies in circular economy implementation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 2225–2249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3593
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. SAGE.
Stucki, T., Woerter, M., & Loumeau, N. (2023). Measuring circular economy transition at company level. Journal of Environmental Management, 326, 116749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116749
Takacs, F., Brunner, D., & Frankenberger, K. (2022). Barriers to a circular economy in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 132227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132227
Thirumal, S., Udawatta, N., Karunasena, G., & Al-Ameri, R. (2024). Barriers to adopting digital technologies for circular economy in construction. Sustainability, 16(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083185
Trevisan, A. H., Castro, C. G., Gomes, L., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). Unlocking the circular ecosystem concept. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 286–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.020
Trevisan, A. H., Lobo, A., Guzzo, D., Gomes, L. A. V., & Mascarenhas, J. (2023). Barriers to employing digital technologies for a circular economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, 117437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117437
Trevisan, A. H., Zacharias, I. S., Liu, Q., Yang, M., & Mascarenhas, J. (2021). Circular economy and digital technologies: A review. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 621–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.62
Uhrenholt, J. N., Kristensen, J. H., Adamsen, S., Jensen, S. F., Colli, M., & Waehrens, B. V. (2022). Twin transition: Synergies between circular economy and IoT. Journal of Circular Economy, 1(1), 1–19.
Väisänen, J.-M., Ranta, V., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2019). Enabling circular economy with software. In Software Business: ICSOB 2019 (pp. 252–259). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1_20
Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.
