Circular Art Economies, Relational Aesthetics and Circular Relationalities: Wang Ruobing’s Plastic Art Practice in Singapore

Tan Qian Hui

doi:10.55845/XJPF2169

Authors

Tan Qian Hui Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55845/XJPF2169

Keywords:

Relational aesthetics, Relational Art, Circular Art Economy, Circular Relationalities, Plastic Waste

Abstract

This paper seeks to foreground the role that artists can play in Singapore’s transition towards a circular economy. Taking Bourriaud’s concept of relational aesthetics as a point of departure, it contends that art projects that recuperate waste can help to close circularity loops by fostering relationships across stakeholders. While an ever-expanding range of R-behaviours has come under the purview of scholars working on circular economies, they have often overlooked the most fundamental ‘R’ undergirding circular practices—that of relationalities. The paper attempts to address this gap by bringing the relational into a productive conversation with circularity. It does so by mobilising Wang Ruobing’s artworks and art practice as a case study to show how socially and environmentally engaged relational art can extend circular economic frameworks beyond its current mold, thereby gesturing towards a circular-relational ethics.

References

Abidin, M. Z., Sabri, N. S., Daud, W. S. A. W. M., & Wulandari, W. S. (2024). Waste Materials as a Sustainable Medium in Contemporary Art: An analysis of Malaysian artists’ creative practices. EnvironmentBehaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(28), 91-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i28.5919

Asamoah, S. P., Adom, D., Kquofi, S., & Nyadu-Addo, R. (2022). Recycled art from plastic waste for environmental sustainability and aesthetics in Ghana. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 3(3), 29-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58256/rjah.v3i3.872

Asamoah, S. P., Adom, D., & Kquofi, S. (2024). Creative Upcycling of Plastic Waste Materials as An Innovative Artistic Technique for Environmental Sustainability, Environmental Aesthetics and Entrepreneurial Avenues in The Kokrobite and Bortianor Communities in Accra. Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana), 1(2), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/just.v1i2.6s

Bennett, J. (2020). Vibrant Matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press: Durham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822391623

Bourriaud, N. (1998). Relational Aesthetics, trans. S. Pleasance and F. Woods, Les Presses du Réel: Dijon.

Bourriaud, N. (2020). Relational form. In P. Kuppers and G. Roberson (ed.) The Community Performance Reader. Routledge: London, pp. 101-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060635-14

Boetzkes, A. (2010). Waste and the sublime landscape. RACAR: Revue d’art Canadienne, 35(1), 22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1066799ar

Boetzkes, A. (2019). Plastic Capitalism: Contemporary art and the drive to waste. MIT Press: Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11972.001.0001

Chertkovskaya, E., Holmberg, K., Petersén, M., Stripple, J., & Ullström, S. (2020). Making visible, rendering obscure: reading the plastic crisis through contemporary artistic visual representations. Global Sustainability, 3, e14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.10

Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2022). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of industrial ecology, 26(2), 421-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13187

Eshun, J. F., & Donkor, E. K. (2022). “Garbage In, Garbage Out” Disposal of Waste: A Concept for Reviving Plastic Waste into Art Objects. Bodrum Journal of Art and Design, 1(2), 181-196.

Donkor, E. K., Micah, V. K. B., & Akomea, D. (2021). Plastic waste and its artistic context. Detritus (Journal for Waste Resources & Residues), 17, 71-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2021.14066

Donkor, E. K., Boakye-Yiadom, F., Ankrah, O. A., & Micah, V. K. B. (2024). Sculpture, circular economy and ecological reflections: redefining waste through sustainable art in Ghana. World Art, 14(3), 279-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21500894.2024.2367962

Gabrys, J. (2013). Plastic and the work of the biodegradable. In A. Bennett and J. Joyce (Eds.) Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn Routledge: London. pp. 42–59.

Guy, S., Henshaw, V., & Heidrich, O. (2015). Climate change, adaptation and eco-art in Singapore. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(1), 39-54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.839446

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press: Durham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q

Helguera, P. (2011). Socially Engaged Art. Jorge Pinto Book: New York.

Kayode, F. (2006). From” Waste to Want”: Regenerating art from discarded objects. FUTY Journal of the Environment, 1(1), 68-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/fje.v1i1.50925

Khumalo, T., & Ndlovu, T. (2025). Recycled Plastic in South African Sculpture: Analyzing the Role of Waste Materials in Contemporary Art. Studies in Art and Architecture, 4(1), 39-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/SAA.2025.02.04

Peeples, J. (2011). Toxic sublime: Imaging contaminated landscapes. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 5(4), 373-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.616516

Ratalewska, M. (2024). Circular economy in creative industries on the example of craft and artisan makers. European Research Studies Journal, 27(3), 1356-1372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3841

Strehovec, J. (2023). The Upcycling and Reappropriation–On Art-Specific Circular Economy in the Age of Climate Change. Cultura, 20(1), 27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/CUL012023.0003

Tan, Q. H., & Yeoh, B. S. (2024). The temporal dimensions of textile circularity loops: A community initiative at shortening loops and prolonging textile lives in Singapore. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 206, 107601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107601

Wagner-Lawlor, J. (2018). Poor theory and the art of plastic pollution in Nigeria: relational aesthetics, human ecology, and “good housekeeping”. Social Dynamics, 44(2), 198-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2018.1481685