A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Emergence, Development and Viability of Rural Circular Bioclusters

Authors

  • Geoffroy Labrouche Université Toulouse II – Jean Jaurès/LEREPS Author
  • Mikaël Akimowicz Université Toulouse III – Paul Sabatier/LEREPS Author
  • Guy-Michel Ndayikeje IEP de Toulouse/LEREPS Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55845/YBAU4375

Keywords:

Circular Bioclusters, Rural Development, Viability, Heritage

Abstract

Current environmental challenges call for the replacement of fossil resources with bioresources. Bioclusters – innovation ecosystems centered on bioresource use – provide solutions to achieve both environmental and economic objectives by balancing ecosystem preservation with the economic exploitation of bioresources. The literature on the role of bioclusters in transitions emphasizes the need for specific frameworks that account for their unique characteristics. In this context, the aim of this paper is to present an original conceptual framework for analyzing the emergence, development, and viability of rural circular bioclusters by integrating rural development literature with discussions from circular economy and economic geography. The framework outlines three steps to study bioclusters: identifying the resources that form the biocluster (emergence), examining the activation process of these resources and the network of players (development), and detailing governance for resource allocation that balances commodification with heritage-based preservation (viability).

References

Akimowicz, M., Weeden, S. A., & Gibson, R. (2023). Searching for a conceptual nexus? A critical analysis of community, place, and territorial approaches to rural development. The Annals of Regional Science, 71(1), 9-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-022-01125-x

Allaire, G. (2018). Quality in economics: A cognitive perspective. In Qualities of food (pp. 6193). Manchester University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137609.00010

Archer, S. R., & Predick, K. I. (2014). An ecosystem services perspective on brush management: Research priorities for competing land-use objectives. Journal of Ecology, 102(6), 13941407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12314

Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907-920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598

Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Bezzon, B., Labrouche, G., & Levy, R. (2024). Regional cooperative banks, ecosystems and small and medium-sized enterprise financing: The importance of cognitive, social and geographic proximities. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31(4), 810-828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-07-2023-0337

Blackmore, C., Sriskandarajah, N., & Ison, R. (2018). Developing learning systems for addressing uncertainty in farming, food and environment: What has changed in recent times? International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 6, 3-15.

Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., & Schoon, M. L. (2015). Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. G. (Ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, (pp. 241-258), Greenwood Press.

Bourdin, S., & Torre, A. (2024). Economic geography’s contribution to understanding the circular economy, Journal of Economic Geography, lbae040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbae040

Caillé, A. (2020). Que donne la nature ?. Cahiers de Psychologie Jungienne, 2, 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cjung.152.0083

Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional competitiveness and territorial capital: A conceptual approach and empirical evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1383-1402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.681640

Ciria, P., & Barro, R. (2016). Biomass resource assessment. In Biomass supply chains for bioenergy and biorefining (pp. 53-83). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-366-9.00003-4

Colletis, G., & Pecqueur, B. (2005). Révélation de ressources spécifiques et coordination située. Économie et institutions, 6-7, 51-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ei.900

Colletis, G., & Pecqueur, B. (2018). Révélation des ressources spécifiques territoriales et inégalités de développement : Le rôle de la proximité géographique. Économie Régionale et Urbaine, (5), 993-1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.185.0993

Colletis-Wahl, K., & Pecqueur, B. (2001). Territories, development and specific resources: What analytical framework? Regional Studies, 35(5), 449-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713693825

Costanza, R. (2012). Ecosystem health and ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 45, 24-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.023

Cristol, D. (2017). Les communautés d’apprentissage : Apprendre ensemble. Savoirs, 43, 10-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/savo.043.0009

Dai, J., Chen, B., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A., & Ahmad, B. (2015). Sustainability-based economic and ecological evaluation of a rural biogas-linked agro-ecosystem. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 347-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.043

D’Amato, D., Bartkowski, B., & Droste, N. (2020). Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research. Ambio, 49, 1878-1896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0

D’Amato, D., & Korhonen, J. (2021). Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecological Economics, 188, 107143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143

Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J. J., & Von Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the bioeconomy: A global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10(9), 3190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190

Flora, C. B., & Flora, J. L. (2013). Rural communities: Legacy and change. Westview Press.

Gray, J., & Curry, P. (2020). Ecodemocracy and political representation for non-human nature. In H. Kopnina & H. Washington (Eds.), Conservation: Integrating social and ecological justice (pp. 155-166). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13905-6_11

Guerrien, B. (2003). Marchandisation et théorie économique. Actuel Marx, (2), 121-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.034.0121

Hériard-Dubreuil, G., & Dewoghélaëre, J. (2014). Biodiversité et long terme: Un défi pour la gouvernance. Vraiment durable, 56(1), 57-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/vdur.005.0057

Hermans, F. (2018). The potential contribution of transition theory to the analysis of bioclusters and their role in the transition to a bioeconomy. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 12(2), 265-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1861

Hermans, F. L. (2021). Bioclusters and sustainable regional development. In Rethinking clusters: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61923-7_6

Place-based value creation in sustainability transitions (pp. 81-91), Springer.

Hoff, H., Johnson, F. X., Allen, B., Biber-Freudenberger, L., & Förster, J. J. (2018). Sustainable bio-resource pathways towards a fossil-free world: The European bioeconomy in a global development context. In Policy paper produced for the IEEP Think2030 conference. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).

Hueso-Kortekaas, K., & Carrasco-Vayá, J.-F. (2024). The patrimonialization of traditional salinas in Europe: A successful transformation from a productive to a services-based activity. Land, 13(6), 772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060772

Ingle, A. P., Philippini, R. R., Martiniano, S., Franco Marcelino, P. R., Gupta, I., Prasad, S., & Silvério da Silva, S. (2020). Bioresources and their significance: Prospects and obstacles. In R. Kataki, A. Pandey, S. Kumar Khanal, & D. Pant (Eds.), Current development in biotechnology and bioengineering: Sustainable bioresources for the emerging bioeconomy (pp. 3-40). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64309-4.00001-5

Ingrao, C., Bacenetti, J., Bezama, A., Blok, V., Goglio, P., Koukios, E. G., Lindner, M., Nemecek, T., Siracusa, V., Zabaniotou, A., & Huisingh, D. (2018). The potential roles of bio-economy in the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies: Findings from this virtual special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 471-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.068

Kamath, R., Elola, A., & Hermans, F. (2023). The green-restructuring of clusters: Investigating a biocluster’s transition using a complex adaptive system model. European Planning Studies, 31(9), 1842-1867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2141054

Kebir, L. (2006). Ressource et développement régional, quels enjeux ? Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine, 5, 701-723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.065.0701

Kirchherr, J., Yang, N. H. N., Schulze-Spüntrup, F., Heerink, M. J., & Hartley, K. (2023).

Conceptualizing the circular economy (revisited): an analysis of 221 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 194, 107001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001

Kopta, T., Kliszcz, A., & Józefowska, A. (2025), Chapter 8: Environmental problems of bioeconomy, In Pink, M., & Józefowska, A. (eds). The Circular Bioeconomy: Institutional and Production Perspectives, (pp. 214-151), Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003453529-10

Krozer, Y., & Narodoslawsky, M. (2019). Economics of bioresources: Concepts, tools, experiences. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14618-4

Labadi, S. (2022). Rethinking heritage for sustainable development. UCL Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781800081925

Labrouche, G., & Levy, R. (2019). Why remain located in small cities? The case of agrifood firms in Occitanie (France). Économie rurale, 2019(371), 35-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.6706

Landel, P. A., & Senil, N. (2009). Patrimoine et territoire, les nouvelles ressources du développement. Développement durable et territoires. Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie, (Dossier 12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/developpementdurable.7563

Lemeilleur, S., & Allaire, G. (2018). Système participatif de garantie dans les labels du mouvement. Économie agriculture biologique: Une réappropriation des communs intellectuels. Économie Rurale, 365, 7-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.5813

Lewandowski, I. (2015). Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.001

Global Food Security, 6, 34-42.

Ling, G. A. (2016). An analysis on Japan’s circular economy and its effects on Japan’s economic development. International Business and Management, 13(2), 1-6.

Lucena-Piquero, D., & Vicente, J. (2019). The visible hand of cluster policy makers: An analysis of Aerospace Valley (2006-2015) using a place-based network methodology. Research Policy, 48(3), 830-842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.001

Malassis, L., & Ghersi, G. (1996). Traité d’économie agro-alimentaire. Éditions Cujas.

Martin, R., & Simmie, J. (2008). The theoretical bases of urban competitiveness: Does proximity matter? Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine, 2008(3), 333-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.083.0333

Martinus, K., & Sigler, T. J. (2018). Global city clusters: Theorizing spatial and non-spatial proximity in inter-urban firm networks. Regional Studies, 52(8), 1041-1052.

Nieddu, M. (2007). Le patrimoine comme relation économique. Économie Appliquée, 60(3), 3155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoap.2007.1848

Nieddu, M., & Vivien, F. D. (2015). La chimie verte, une fausse rupture? Les trajectoires de la transition écologique. Revue Française de Socio-Économie, 139-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfse.hs1.0139

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Polèse, M., & Shearmur, R. (2005). Économie urbaine et régionale: Introduction à la géographie économique. Economica.

Pottier, A. (2014). The Forest of the Landes de Gascogne, a natural heritage? The foresters’ viewpoint. In Annales de géographie, Vol. 698, No. 4, (pp. 1016-1038). Armand Colin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.698.1016

Salmon, S., & Akimowicz, M. (2022). Commodification vs. patrimonialisation? A community capitals framework for assessing digital technologies: The case of Southern Rural Manitoba, Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 8(1), 3-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2022.123038

Sanz-Hernández, A., Esteban, E., & Garrido, P. (2019). Transition to a bioeconomy: Perspectives from social sciences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.168

Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 249-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375

Schneider, P., & Belousova, A. (2019). Ecosystem services and sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education (pp. 1-12). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_423-1

Schneider, F., Feurer, M., Lundsgaard-Hansen, L. M., Myint, W., Nuam, C. D., Nydegger, K., & Messerli, P. (2020). Sustainable development under competing claims on land: Three pathways between land-use changes, ecosystem services and human well-being. The European Journal of Development Research, 32, 316-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00268-x

Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. SAGE.

Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press.

Starke, J. R., Metze, T. A. P., Candel, J. J. L., & Termeer, K. J. A. M. (2024). Hearing, listening, and learning: How bioeconomy triple helix clusters deal with uninvited societal input. Sustainability Science, 19(5), 1661-1675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01537-y

Stegmann, P., Londo, M., & Junginger, M. (2020). The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, 6, 100029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029

Talandier, M., Navarre, F., Ruault, J. F., Cormier, L., Landel, P. A., & Senil, N. (2020).

Outstanding heritage sites, a resource for the territories. Peer-reviewed article. Via. Tourism Review, (18).

Théret, B. (1994). To have or to be: On the problem of the interaction between State and economy and its ‘solidarist’ mode of regulation. Economy and Society, 23(1), 1-46, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149400000012

Torre, A., & Beuret, J. E. (2012). Proximités territoriales. Economica.

Van Lancker, J., Wauters, E., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2016). Managing innovation in the bioeconomy: An open innovation perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy, 90, 60-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.017

Vejre, H., Jensen, F. S., & Thorsen, B. J. (2010). Demonstrating the importance of intangible ecosystem services from peri-urban landscapes. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 338-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.09.005

Velenturf, A. P. (2017). Initiating resource partnerships for industrial symbiosis. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 4(1), 117-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2017.1328285

Vicente, J. (2018). Economics of clusters: A brief history of cluster theories and policy. Springer. Watkins, D., & Gioia, D. (2015). Mixed methods research. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78870-8_2

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1989). Canonical analysis of the composition and structure of social networks. Sociological Methodology, 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/270947

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2-3.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207

Wilde, K., & Hermans, F. (2021). Deconstructing the attractiveness of biocluster imaginaries. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(2), 227-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1891872

Wohlfahrt, J., Ferchaud, F., Gabrielle, B., Godard, C., Kurek, B., Loyce, C., & Therond, O. (2019). Characteristics of bioeconomy systems and sustainability issues at the territorial scale: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 898-909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.385

Zimmermann, J., Torre, A., & Grossetti, M. (2022). “Chapter 1: The French School of Proximity:

genesis and evolution of a school of thought”. In Torre, A & Gallaud, D., Handbook of Proximity Relations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Downloads

Published

06-02-2025

How to Cite

Labrouche, G., Akimowicz, M., & Ndayikeje, G.-M. (2025). A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Emergence, Development and Viability of Rural Circular Bioclusters. Journal of Circular Economy, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.55845/YBAU4375