Circular Entrepreneurship via Makerspaces Towards Fostering Sustainable Cities: A Mixed-Method Approach with Case Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/QZUU6387Keywords:
Circular Economy, Maker Movement, Social Innovation, Citizen Participation, Innovation Ecosystem, Urban RegenerationAbstract
This paper discusses the role of makerspaces in supporting circular entrepreneurship and their potential contribution to urban regeneration. Urban regeneration addresses urban challenges through sustainable and inclusive transformations. Circular makerspaces can support this direction by providing resources for makers and promoting a circular economy, while potentially acting as hubs for circular social innovation. However, to unlock makers’ full sustainability potential, makerspaces require business support services that foster entrepreneurial mindsets towards a circular economy. This study uses a mixed-method approach, including action research, surveys, observations and case studies, to analyse the design and implementation of a circular accelerator programme in makerspaces across seven cities in Europe and Türkiye, supported with data gathered from 105 makers and 40 projects in circular entrepreneurship. The research suggests potential benefits such as the improvement of entrepreneurial skills, environmental impact awareness, and the enhanced network and collaborations, fostering further opportunities for the development of circular economy. The paper suggests that acceleration programmes via makerspaces focused on circular economy can have multiple benefits for both the makers and their urban context. These findings could support administrators, municipalities, urban planners and policy makers to examine additional ways to support urban regeneration and sustainability.
References
Andrews, M. E., Borrego, M., & Boklage, A. (2021). Self-efficacy and belonging: The impact of a university makerspace. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0
Al Sader, N., Kleinhans, R., & Van Ham, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial citizenship in urban regeneration in the Netherlands. Citizenship studies, 23(5), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1621266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1621266
Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2018). Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. Journal of science and technology policy management, 9(2), 146-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0016
Bank, N., Fichter, K., & Klofsten, M. (2017). Sustainability-profiled incubators and securing the inflow of tenants–The case of Green Garage Berlin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 157, 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.123
Bergman Jr, B. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2020). Entrepreneurs in the making: Six decisions for fostering entrepreneurship through maker spaces. Business Horizons, 63(6), 811-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.004
Browder, R. E., Aldrich, H. E., & Bradley, S. W. (2019). The emergence of the maker movement: Implications for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005
Cheshire, J. & Batty M. (2022). The era of the megalopolis: How the world’s cities are merging. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/11/the-megalopolis-how-the-world-cities-merging-urbanization/ (accessed October 22, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.64628/AB.n6cjtsqkh
Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1
Coskun, A., Metta, J., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Çay, D., & Bachus, K. (2022). Make it a circular city: Experiences and challenges from European cities striving for sustainability through promoting circular making. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 185, 106495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106495
Coskun, A., Hofgärtner, R., Metta, J., Schmidt, A., & Tsolakis, A. C. (2024). Circular Makerspaces as Alternative Employment Platforms for Circular Jobs. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00413-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00413-2
Cullen, U. A., & De Angelis, R. (2021). Circular entrepreneurship: A business model perspective. Resources, conservation and recycling, 168, 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105300
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
De Oliveira, B. (2023). Participatory action research as a research approach: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0101
dos Santos Figueiredo, Y. D., Prim, M. A., & Dandolini, G. A. (2022). Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review. Land Use Policy, 113, 105873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873
Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations:Technology, governance, globalization, 7(3), 11-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
Doussard, M., Schrock, G., Wolf-Powers, L., Eisenburger, M., & Marotta, S. (2018). Manufacturing without the firm: Challenges for the maker movement in three US cities. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(3), 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17749709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17749709
Doyle, G. (2019). A new era for reuse social enterprises in Ireland? The capacities required for achieving sustainability. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.012
Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2008). Rethinking sustainable urban regeneration: ambiguity, creativity, and the shared territory. Environment and Planning A, 40(6), 1416-1434. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a39293
Elwakil, R., Schroder, I., & Steemers, K. (2023). Circular maker cities: Maker space typologies and circular urban design. Buildings, 13(11), 2894. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112894
European Commission. (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe, COM (2020) 98 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:9903b325-6388-11ea-b735-01aa75ed71a1.0017.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (accessed February 21, 2024).
Galuppo, L., Kajamaa, A., Ivaldi, S., & Scaratti, G. (2019). Translating sustainability into action: A management challenge in FabLabs. Sustainability, 11(6), 1676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061676
Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., de Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of cleaner production, 190, 712-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159
Ghisellini, P., & Ulgiati, S. (2020). Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. Journal of cleaner production, 243, 118360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118360
Girard, L. F., & Nocca, F. (2022). Urban values-centred regeneration in the perspective of the circular economy model: An overview of the key issues. Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Heritage, 438-456. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038955-35
Gregori, P., Wdowiak, M. A., Schwarz, E. J., & Holzmann, P. (2019). Exploring value creation in sustainable entrepreneurship: Insights from the institutional logics perspective and the business model lens. Sustainability, 11(9), 2505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092505
Gupta, H., Kumar, A., & Wasan, P. (2021). Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253
Hallen, B. L., Cohen, S. L., & Bingham, C. B. (2020). Do accelerators work? If so, how?. Organization Science, 31(2), 378-414. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1304
Javidroozi, V., Carter, C., Grace, M., & Shah, H. (2023). Smart, sustainable, green cities: a state-of-the-art review. Sustainability, 15(6), 5353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065353
Jefferson, T., Austen, S., Sharp, R., Ong, R., Lewin, G., & Adams, V. (2014). Mixed-methods research: What’s in it for economists?. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 25(2), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304614530819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304614530819
JRC. (2023). Joint Research Centre. EU Makerspaces Map. European Commission. https://cop-demos.jrc.ec.europa.eu/eu-makerspaces-map (accessed October 20, 2024).
Kummitha, R. K. R. (2018). Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.010
Kruger, S., & Steyn, A. A. (2021). A conceptual model of entrepreneurial competencies needed to utilise technologies of Industry 4.0. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 22(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750320927359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750320927359
Leech, N. L., Dellinger, A. B., Brannagan, K. B., & Tanaka, H. (2010). Evaluating mixed research studies: A mixed methods approach. Journal of mixed methods research, 4(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809345262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809345262
Levoso, A. S., Gasol, C. M., Martínez-Blanco, J., Durany, X. G., Lehmann, M., & Gaya, R. F. (2020). Methodological framework for the implementation of circular economy in urban systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119227
Luederitz, C., Westman, L., Mercado, A., Kundurpi, A., & Burch, S. L. (2023). Conceptualizing the potential of entrepreneurship to shape urban sustainability transformations. Urban Transformations, 5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-023-00048-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-023-00048-w
Maravilhas, S., & Martins, J. S. (2018). Fab Labs and Makerspaces for Learning and Innovation: The Case of Arhte Program in Brazil. In Handbook of Research on Strategic Innovation Management for Improved Competitive Advantage (pp. 761-772). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3012-1.ch039
Marotta, S. (2021). Making sense of ‘maker’: Work, identity, and affect in the maker movement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(4), 638-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20964839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20964839
Mersand, S. (2021). The state of makerspace research: A review of the literature. TechTrends, 65(2), 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00566-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00566-5
Millard, J., Sorivelle, M. N., Deljanin, S., Unterfrauner, E., & Voigt, C. (2018). Is the maker movement contributing to sustainability?. Sustainability, 10(7), 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072212
Metta, J., & Bachus, K. (2020). Pop-Machina: the breakthrough of the circular maker movement in Europe. Open Access Government.
Paes, V. D. C., Pessoa, C. H. M., Pagliusi, R. P., Barbosa, C. E., Argôlo, M., de Lima, Y. O., … & de Souza, J. M. (2023). Analyzing the challenges for future smart and Sustainable Cities. Sustainability, 15(10), 7996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107996
Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
Pradel-Miquel, M. (2021). Analysing the role of citizens in urban regeneration: Bottom-linked initiatives in Barcelona. Urban Research & Practice, 14(3), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1737725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1737725
Premyanov, N., Metta, J., Angelidou, M., Tsoniotis, N., Politis, C., Athanasiadou, E. R., & Tsolakis, A. C. (2022, July). Circular makerspaces as entrepreneurship platforms for smart and sustainable cities. In 2022 7th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech55088.2022.9854289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech55088.2022.9854289
Prifti, R., & Jaupi, F. (2020). Entrepreneurial urban regeneration: Business improvement districts as a form of organizational innovation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003103127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003103127
Probst, L., Frideres, L., Pedersen, B., & Lidé, S. (2015). Collaborative Economy. Collaborative production and the maker economy. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General Growth. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/13423/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native (accessed October 20, 2024).
Q-Plan International. (2023) Data collected from questionnaires to collect feedback on the services’ performance / accelerator programme and outcomes, Zenodo [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8301519.
Ramella, F., & Manzo, C. (2018). Into the crisis: Fab Labs–a European story. The Sociological Review, 66(2), 341-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118758535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118758535
Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2021). Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120391
Rahman, M., & Best, M. (2024). Sustainability of Makerspaces: Developing a Framework for Sustainable Community Innovation Centers. ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies, 2(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3675761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3675761
Rimmer, M. (2023). The Medical Right to Repair: Intellectual Property, the Maker Movement, and COVID-19. Sustainability, 15(20), 14839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014839
Roberts, P., & Hugh S., (1999). eds. Urban regeneration: a handbook. Sage.
Rosa, P., Ferretti, F., Pereira, Â. G., Panella, F., & Wanner, M. (2017). Overview of the maker movement in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC107298/jrc_technical_report_-_overview_maker_movement_in_eu.pdf (accessed October 20, 2024).
Saari, H., Åkerman, M., Kieslinger, B., Myllyoja, J., & Sipos, R. (2021). How open is the maker movement? Integrative literature review of the openness practices in the global maker movement. Sustainability, 13(24), 13559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413559
Serwatka, A. (2018). Accelerators for startups in Europe. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 7(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2018.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2018.005
Suchek, N., Ferreira, J. J., & Fernandes, P. O. (2022). A review of entrepreneurship and circular economy research: State of the art and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2256-2283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3020
Tsolakis, A.C., Roma-Athanasiadou, E., Premyanov, N., & Tsoniotis, N. (2023). POP-MACHINA Circular Maker Accelerator Handbook. Pop-Machina project 821479 – H2020. https://pop-machina.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Pop-Machina-Circular-Maker-Accelerator-Handbook-v2.0.pdf (accessed February 21, 2024).
Tsui, T., Peck, D., Geldermans, B., & Van Timmeren, A. (2020). The role of urban manufacturing for a circular economy in cities. Sustainability, 13(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010023
(2017). GOAL 11: sustainable cities and communities. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/sustainable-development-goals/why-do-sustainable-development-goals-matter/goal-11 (accessed July 16, 2024).
(2023). Entrepreneurs Riding the Wave of Circularity. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diae2023d6_en.pdf (accessed July 16, 2024)
Van Holm, E. J. (2015). Makerspaces and contributions to entrepreneurship. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.167
Ward, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial urbanism and the management of the contemporary city: The examples of business improvement districts.
Wise, N., Özdemir, Ö. G., & Fillis, I. (2022). Creative entrepreneurship, urban transformation and the (Baltic) triangle model. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 24(2), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-02-2021-0017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-02-2021-0017
Yang, S., Kher, R., & Lyons, T. S. (2018). Where do accelerators fit in the venture creation pipeline? Different values brought by different types of accelerators. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 8(4), 20170140. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0140
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
