Twin Transition: Synergies between Circular Economy and Internet of Things – A Study of Danish Manufacturers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55845/HRGW4040Keywords:
Industry 4.0, Industrial Sustainability, Barriers, Enablers, Closed-loop Supply Chain, Business Model Innovation, Maturity, Cumulative CapabilityAbstract
The relation between digital technologies of the industry 4.0 agenda and the circular economy agenda is being coined as mutually beneficial in the twin transition agenda. However, the agenda is in a pre-paradigmatic stage where the dual relationship is primarily discussed at a conceptual level. At the same time, manufacturers are challenged in building sustained performance improvements from either transition. Therefore, this study adopts the multiple case study methodology for investigating the synergetic relation between the internet of things (IoT) and the circular economy (CE) in ten Danish manufacturers as representations of the constituting constructs of the twin transitixon agenda. Accordingly, this study proposes two empirically based propositions for the synergetic relationship between the two: IoT enables the circular economy engagement from the cumulative build-up of data capabilities and their connection to particular value propositions. At the same time, the value and purpose of digital technology are elevated to a strategic perspective when adopting circular economy as a design parameter.
References
Agyemang, M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Khan, S. A., Mani, V., Rehman, S. T., & Kusi-Sarpong, H. (2019). Drivers and barriers to circular economy implementation. Management Decision, 57(4), 971-994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1178
Ayati, M. S., Shekarian, E., Majava, J., & Wæhrens, B. V. (2022). Toward a circular supply chain: Understanding barriers from the perspective of recovery approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 359, 131775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131775
Birkel, H. S., & Hartmann, E. (2020). Internet of Things–the future of managing supply chain risks. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(5), 535-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2019-0356
Bjerre, M., & Parbo, N. (2021). Looping on data. Denmark: Danish Busnines Authority.
Bocken, N. M., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
Campbell-Johnston, K., ten Cate, J., Elfering-Petrovic, M., & Gupta, J. (2019). City level circular transitions: Barriers and limits in Amsterdam, Utrecht and The Hague. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1232-1239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.106
Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking. Rethinking Management Information Systems 45-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198775331.003.0004
Chen, K., Lassen, A., Li, C., & Møller, C. (2022). Exploring the value of IoT data as an enabler of the transformation towards servitization: an action design research approach. European Journal of Information Systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2046515
Colli, M., Berger, U., Bockholt, M., Madsen, O., Møller, C., & Wæhrens, B. V. (2019). A maturity assessment approach for conceiving context-specific roadmaps in the Industry 4.0 era. Annual Reviews in Control, 48, 165-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.06.001
Colli, M., Stingl, V., & Waehrens, B. V. (2021a). Making or breaking the business case of digital transformation initiatives: the key role of learnings. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(1), 41-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2020-0330
Colli, M., Uhrenholt, J. N., Madsen, O., & Waehrens, B. V. (2021b). Translating transparency into value: an approach to design IoT solutions. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(8), 1515-1532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2020-0225
De Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
European Commission. (2022). TWIN GREEN AND DIGITAL TRANSITION 2021. European Commission. Retrieved 01-07-2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/horizon-cl4-2021-twin-transition-01-12
Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (2004). An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 439-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.03.002
Garms, F., Jansen, C., Schmitz, C., Hallerstede, S., & Tschiesner, A. (2019, Sep 13,). Capturing value at scale in discrete manufacturing with Industry 4.0. McKinsey Insights, https://search.proquest.com/docview/2375487541
Gartner. (2022). What Is Data and Analytics? Gartner. Retrieved 02-03-2022, from https://www.gartner.com/en/topics/data-and-analytics
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Guldmann, E., & Huulgaard, R. D. (2020). Barriers to circular business model innovation: A multiple-case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118160
Haddud, A., DeSouza, A., Khare, A., & Lee, H. (2017). Examining potential benefits and challenges associated with the Internet of Things integration in supply chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(8), 1055-1085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2017-0094
Ingemarsdotter, E., Jamsin, E., Kortuem, G., & Balkenende, R. (2019). Circular strategies enabled by the internet of things—A framework and analysis of current practice. Sustainability, 11(20), 5689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205689
Jensen, J. P., & Remmen, A. (2017). Enabling circular economy through product stewardship. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 377-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.048
Karlsson, C. (2010). Researching operations management. Researching operations management (pp. 20-55). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203886816
Kashmanian, R. M. (2017). Building greater transparency in supply chains to advance sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 26(3), 73-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21495
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the circular economy: Evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028
Kjaer, L. L., Pigosso, D. C., Niero, M., Bech, N. M., & McAloone, T. C. (2019). Product/service‐systems for a circular economy: The route to decoupling economic growth from resource consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 22-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12747
Lassen, A. H., & Waehrens, B. V. V. (2021). Labour 4.0: developing competences for smart production. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 14(4), 659-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-11-2019-0064
Lindkvist Haziri, L., Sundin, E., & Sakao, T. (2019). Feedback from remanufacturing: its unexploited potential to improve future product design. Sustainability, 11(15), 4037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154037
Masi, D., Kumar, V., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Godsell, J. (2018). Towards a more circular economy: exploring the awareness, practices, and barriers from a focal firm perspective. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 539-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449246
Mishra, J. L., Hopkinson, P. G., & Tidridge, G. (2018). Value creation from circular economy-led closed loop supply chains: a case study of fast-moving consumer goods. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 509-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449245
Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(3), 1118-1136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647
Ollagnier, J. M., Brueckner, M., Berjoan, S., & Dijkstra S. (2020). The European Double Up: A twin strategy that will strengthen competitiveness. https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/strategy/european-double-up
Ormazabal, M., Prieto-Sandoval, V., Puga-Leal, R., & Jaca, C. (2018). Circular economy in Spanish SMEs: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 157-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031
Ortega-Gras, J., Bueno-Delgado, M., Cañavate-Cruzado, G., & Garrido-Lova, J. (2021). Twin Transition through the Implementation of Industry 4.0 Technologies: Desk-Research Analysis and Practical Use Cases in Europe. Sustainability, 13(24), 13601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413601
Pagoropoulos, A., Pigosso, D. C., & McAloone, T. C. (2017). The emergent role of digital technologies in the Circular Economy: A review. Procedia CIRP, 64, 19-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.047
Rejeb, A., Suhaiza, Z., Rejeb, K., Seuring, S., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022). The Internet of Things and the circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131439
Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Terzi, S. (2020). Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1662-1687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896
Singh, J., & Ordoñez, I. (2016). Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: important lessons for the upcoming circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 342-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.020
Singh, R., & Bhanot, N. (2020). An integrated DEMATEL-MMDE-ISM based approach for analysing the barriers of IoT implementation in the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Research, 58(8), 2454-2476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1675915
Spring, M., & Araujo, L. (2017). Product biographies in servitization and the circular economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 126-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.07.001
Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414
Uhrenholt, J. N., Kristensen, J. H., Rincón, M. C., Adamsen, S., Jensen, S. F., & Waehrens, B. V. (2022a). Maturity Model as a Driver for Circular Economy Transformation. Sustainability, 14(12), 7483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127483
Uhrenholt, J. N., Kristensen, J. H., Rincón, M. C., Jensen, S. F., & Waehrens, B. V. (2022b). Circular economy: Factors affecting the financial performance of product take-back systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130319
Urbinati, A., Franzò, S., & Chiaroni, D. (2021). Enablers and Barriers for Circular Business Models: an empirical analysis in the Italian automotive industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 551-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.022
Voss, C. (2010). Case research in operations management. Researching operations management (pp. 176-209). Routledge.
Werning, J. P., & Spinler, S. (2020). Transition to circular economy on firm level: Barrier identification and prioritization along the value chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118609
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
Zhu, S., Song, J., Hazen, B. T., Lee, K., & Cegielski, C. (2018). How supply chain analytics enables operational supply chain transparency: An organizational information processing theory perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1), 47-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2017-0341
