Journal of Circular Economy

Few studies have explicitly explored regional embeddedness and both the inconsistencies and injustices of circular bioeconomy (CBE) innovations. To better navigate the normative dimension of these innovations and CBE transitions in general, our article presents a threefold argument for the relevance of the regional level of analysis. First, CBE innovations are influenced by and affect regional metabolisms and actor constellations, assets, and (biophysical) resources within regional innovation systems (RIS). Second, thoroughly exploring these dimensions of regional (un)embeddedness can reveal ethical concerns, including potential "dark sides" and injustices, such as exclusivity and exploitation. Third, to address these concerns in CBE research and governance, we outline four facets: complementing the RIS as a framework and policy approach, balancing creative and destructive measures, addressing the need for more inclusive regional CBE policies, and establishing dedicated intermediaries to better govern regional CBE transitions. In summary, this conceptual article provides starting points for further research and proactive measures that help govern the normative dimension and the design of CBE transitions at the regional level, promoting inclusivity, justice, responsibility, and legitimacy for both innovation and exnovation.

Circular Bioeconomy, Socio-Economic Embeddedness; Socio-Ecological Embeddedness; Justice, Directionality, Legitimacy, Responsibility, Social Metabolism, Dedicated Innovation System, Challenge-Oriented Regional Innovation System, Regional Policy, Inclusive Innovation, Intermediaries

Abson, D., von Wehrden, H., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., Härdtle, W., Heinrichs, H., Klein, A.M., Lang, D.J., Martens, P., & Walmsley, D. (2014). Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 103, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012

Abson, D.J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., von Wehrden, H., Abernethy, P., Ives, C.I., Jager, N.W., Lang, D.J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y

Albrecht, M. (2019). (Re-)producing bioassemblages: Positionalities of regional bioeconomy development in Finland. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 24(4), 342-357.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1567482

Almudi, I., & Fatas-Villafranca, F. (2018). Promotion and coevolutionary dynamics in contemporary capitalism. Journal of Economic Issues, 52(1), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1430943

Almudi, I., & Fatas-Villafranca, F. (2022). “Coevolution” (in innovative economic systems). In C. Antonelli (Ed.), Elgar encyclopedia on the economics of knowledge and innovation (pp. 39-45). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106996.00009

Andersen, A. D., & Johnson, B. (2015). Low-carbon development and inclusive innovation systems. Innovation and Development, 5(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2015.1049849

Andersson, C., Törnberg, P. (2018) Wickedness and the anatomy of complexity. Futures, 95, 118-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.11.001

Andersson, J., Hellsmark, H., & Sandén, B. (2021). The outcomes of directionality: Towards a morphology of sociotechnical systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 108-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.06.008

Asheim, B. (2007). Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610701722846

Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2006). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg & D.C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011

Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past – present – future. In R. Shearmu, C. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of innovation (pp. 45–62). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710774.00010

Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2017). Introduction: Combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics. Economic Geography, 93(5), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775

Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems. Edward Elgar.

Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2020). The role of the Regional Innovation System approach in contemporary regional policy: Is it still relevant in a globalised world? In M. González-López & B. T. Asheim (Eds.), Regions and innovation policies in Europe: Learning from the margins (pp. 12-29). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789904161.00006

Backhouse, M., Lehmann, R., Lorenzen, K., Lühmann, M., Puder, J., Rodríguez, F., & Tittor, A. (Eds.) (2021). Bioeconomy and global inequalities: Socio-ecological perspectives on biomass sourcing and production. Palgrave Macmillan.

Backhouse, M., Lühmann, M., & Tittor, A. (2022). Global inequalities in the bioeconomy: Thinking continuity and change in view of the global soy complex. Sustainability, 14(9), 5481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095481

Bastos Lima, M. G. (2022). Just transition towards a bioeconomy: Four dimensions in Brazil, India and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 136, 102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102684

Bennett, N.J., Blythe, J., Cisneros-Montemayor, A.M., Singh, G.G., & Sumaila, U.R. (2019). Just transformations to sustainability. Sustainability, 11(14), 3881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143881

Biber-Freudenberger, L., Ergeneman, C., Förster, J.J., Dietz, T., & Börner, J. (2020). Bioeconomy futures: Expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio-based transformation. Sustainable Development, 28, 1220-1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2072.

Birch, K. (2012). Knowledge, place, and power: Geographies of value in the bioeconomy. New Genetics and Society, 31(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2012.662051

Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284-1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012

Blok, V. (2021). What is innovation? Laying the ground for a philosophy of innovation. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 25(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2020109129

Blok, V. (2023). The normative and social dimensions of the transition towards a responsible, circular bio-based economy. In S. Lamalle & P. Stoett (Eds.), Representations and rights of the environment (pp. 334–352). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769327.018

Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2015). The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In B.-J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible innovation 2: Concepts, approaches, and applications (pp. 19-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2

BMBF [Federal Ministry of Education and Research] & BMEL [Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture] (2020). National Bioeconomy Strategy. Online: https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Publications/national-bioeconomy-strategy.pdf

Bogner, K., & Dahlke, J. (2022). Born to transform? German bioeconomy policy and research projects for transformations towards sustainability. Ecological Economics, 195, 107366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107366

Bogner, K., Kump, B., Beekman, M., Wittmayer, J. (2024). Coping with transition pain: An emotions perspective on phase-outs in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 50, 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100806

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887

Boschma, R. (2023). Evolutionary economic geography and policy. In K. Dopfer, R.R. Nelson, J. Potts, & A. Pyka (Eds.), Routledge handbook of evolutionary economics (pp. 332-340). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398971-28

Boyer, M., Kusche, F., Hackfort, S., Prause, L., & Engelbrecht-Bock, F. (2023). The making of sustainability: Ideological strategies, the materiality of nature, and biomass use in the bioeconomy. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01254-4

Breslin, D., Kask, J., Schlaile, M., & Abatecola, G. (2021). Developing a coevolutionary account of innovation ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.07.016

Bröring, S., Baum, C.M., Butkowski, O.K., & Kircher, M. (2020). Criteria for the success of the bioeconomy. In J. Pietzsch (Ed.), Bioeconomy for beginners (pp. 159-176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60390-1_8

Bryden, J., Gezelius, S.G., Refsgaard, K., & Sutz, J. (2017). Inclusive innovation in the bioeconomy: Concepts and directions for research. Innovation and Development, 7(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1281209

Buchmann, T., & Pyka, A. (2012). Innovation networks. In M. Dietrich & J. Krafft (Eds.), Handbook on the economics and theory of the firm (pp. 466–482). Edward Elgar.

Bugge, M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What Is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(7), 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691

Bunker, I., & Zscheischler, J. (2023). Societal acceptability of insect-based livestock feed: A qualitative study from Europe. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 36, 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-023-09917-7

Busch, C., & Barkema, H. (2019). Social entrepreneurs as network orchestrators: A framework and research agenda on networks and leadership in the context of social innovation. In G. George, T. Baker, P. Tracey, & H. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of inclusive innovation: The role of organizations, markets and communities in social innovation (pp. 464-485). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786436016.00038

Busse, M., Zoll, F., Siebert, R., Bartels, A., Bokelmann, A., & Scharschmidt, P. (2021). How farmers think about insects: perceptions of biodiversity, biodiversity loss and attitudes towards insect-friendly farming practices. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30, 3045-3066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02235-2

Butzin, A., & Widmaier, B. (2016). Exploring territorial knowledge dynamics through innovation biographies. Regional Studies, 50(2), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.1001353

Cameron, W.B. (1963). Informal sociology: A casual introduction to sociological thinking. Random House.

Chaminade, C. (2020). Innovation for what? Unpacking the role of innovation for weak and strong sustainability. Journal of Sustainability Research, 2(1), e200007. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200007

Chembessi, C. (2023). Learning and knowledge management in the transition to Circular Economy (CE): Roots and research avenues. Journal of Circular Economy, 1(3), https://doi.org/10.55845/FJWU9610

Ciplet, D., & Harrison, J.L. (2020). Transition tensions: Mapping conflicts in movements for a just and sustainable transition. Environmental Politics, 29(3), 435-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1595883

Coad, A., Nightingale, P., Stilgoe, J., & Vezzani, A. (2021). Editorial: The dark side of innovation. Industry and Innovation, 28(1), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1818555

Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. Frances Pinter (Publishers) Limited.

Cooke, P., Clifton, N., & Oleaga, M. (2005). Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1065-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500328065

Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.

Daimer, S., Hufnagl, M., & Warnke, P. (2012). Challenge-oriented policy-making and innovation systems theory: Reconsidering systemic instruments. In Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI (Ed.), Innovation systems revisited: Experiences from 40 years of Fraunhofer ISI research (pp. 217-234). Fraunhofer Verlag.

D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., Leskinen, P., Matthies, B. D., & Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053

Davidson,D.J. (2019). Exnovating for a renewable energy transition. Nature Energy, 4, 254-256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0369-3

Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. Yale University Press.

Dieken, S., Dallendörfer, M., Henseleit, M., Siekmann, F., & Venghaus, S. (2021). The multitudes of bioeconomies: A systematic review of stakeholders’ bioeconomy perceptions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1703–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.006

Dobroć, P., Bögel, P., & Upham, P. (2023). Narratives of change: Strategies for inclusivity in shaping socio-technical future visions. Futures, 145, 103076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103076

Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and theories of distributive justice. Oxford University Press.

Dorninger, C., Menéndez, L. P., & Caniglia, G. (2024). Social-ecological niche construction for sustainability: Understanding destructive processes and exploring regenerative potentials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379(1893), 20220431. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0431

European Commission (2018). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe. Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment: Updated bioeconomy strategy. Publications Office of the European Union.  https://doi.org/10.2777/792130

European Environment Agency (2024). Delivering justice in sustainability transitions. Briefing no. 26/2023. https://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/GEQ192K8SN

Eversberg, D., & Fritz, M. (2022). Bioeconomy as a societal transformation: Mentalities, conflicts and social practices. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 973–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.021

Eversberg, D., Holz, J., & Pungas, L. (2023). The bioeconomy and its untenable growth promises: Reality checks from research. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01237-5

Eversberg, D., Koch, P., Lehmann, R., Saltelli, A., Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Kovacic, Z. (2023). The more things change, the more they stay the same: Promises of bioeconomy and the economy of promises. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01321-4

Feola, G., Vincent, O., & Moore, D. (2021). (Un)making in sustainability transformation beyond capitalism. Global Environmental Change, 69, 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102290

Ferraz, D., & Pyka, A. (2023). Circular economy, bioeconomy, and sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29632-0

Fischer‐Kowalski, M. (1998). Society’s metabolism: The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61

Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (1998). Sustainable development: Socio-economic metabolism and colonization of nature. International Social Science Journal, 50(158), 573-587. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00169

Fischer‐Kowalski, M., & Hüttler, W. (1998). Society’s metabolism: The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, part II, 1970–1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.4.107

Foray, D. (2023). Smart specialisation. In K. Dopfer, R.R. Nelson, J. Potts, & A. Pyka (Eds.), Routledge handbook of evolutionary economics (pp. 316-331). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398971-27

Frenken, K., Van Oort, F.G., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.

Friedrich, J., Bunker, I., Uthes, S., Zscheischler, J. (2021) The potential of bioeconomic innovations to contribute to a social-ecological transformation: A case study in the livestock system. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 34, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09866-z

Friedrich, J., Holz, J., Koch, P., Pungas, L., Eversberg, D., & Zscheischler, J. (2023). Rural bioeconomies in Europe: Socio-ecological conflicts, marginalized people and practices. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.2.3

Friedrich, J., Najork, K., Keck, M., & Zscheischler, J. (2022). Bioeconomic fiction between narrative dynamics and a fixed imaginary: Evidence from India and Germany. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.026

Friedrich, J., Tups, G. (2023). Mission impossible? The fugacity of the new and the persistence of the old as mechanisms of un-making futures. Dialogues in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231206744

Friedrich, J., Zscheischler, J., & Faust, H. (2022). Preservation, modernization, and transformation: Contesting bioeconomic imaginations of “manure futures” and trajectories toward a sustainable livestock system. Sustainability Science, 17(6), 2221–2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01161-8

Fritsch, M., Kudic, M., & Pyka, A. (2019). Evolution and co-evolution of regional innovation processes. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1235-1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1627306

Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2019). Regional trajectories of entrepreneurship, knowledge, and growth: The role of history and culture. Springer.

Fritsche, U., Brunori, G., Chiaramonti, D., Galanakis, C., Hellweg, S., Matthews, R., & Panoutsou, C. (2020). Future transitions for the bioeconomy towards sustainable development and a climate-neutral economy: Knowledge synthesis final report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/667966

George, G., Baker, T., Tracey, P., & Joshi, H. (2019). Inclusion and innovation: A call to action. In G. George, T. Baker, P. Tracey, & H. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of inclusive innovation: The role of organizations, markets and communities in social innovation (pp. 2-22). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786436016.00008

Genus, A., & Stirling, A. (2018). Collingridge and the dilemma of control: Towards responsible and accountable innovation. Research Policy, 47, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012

Giampietro, M. (2019). On the circular bioeconomy and decoupling: Implications for sustainable growth. Ecological Economics, 162, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001

Godin, B. (2006). The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(6), 639-667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906291865

Godin, B. (2014). “Innovation Studies”: Staking the claim for a new disciplinary “tribe”. Minerva, 52(4), 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9262-1

Graf, H., & Kalthaus, M. (2023). Global knowledge embeddedness. In K. Dopfer, R.R. Nelson, J. Potts, & A. Pyka (Eds.), Routledge handbook of evolutionary economics (pp. 341-358). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398971-29

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

Haarich, S., & Kirchmayr-Novak, S. (2022). Bioeconomy strategy development in EU regions. (Edited by J. Sanchez Lopez, M.T. Borzacchiello, & M. Avraamides). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/065902

Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., & Schmid, M. (2023). Socio-metabolic transitions. In M. U. Hensel, D. Sunguroğlu Hensel, C. R. Binder, & F. Ludwig (Eds.), Introduction to designing environments (pp. 71–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34378-0_5

Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Pauliuk, S., Krausmann, F., Müller, D. B., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2019). Contributions of sociometabolic research to sustainability science. Nature Sustainability, 2(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0225-2

Haddad, C., Nakić, V., Bergek, A., & Hellsmark, H. (2022). Transformative innovation policy: A systematic review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43, 14-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.03.002

Hall, B.L., & Tandon, R. (2017). Decolonization of knowledge, epistemicide, participatory research and higher education. Research for All, 1(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.01.1.02

Halonen, M., Näyhä, A., & Kuhmonen, I. (2022). Regional sustainability transition through forest-based bioeconomy? Development actors’ perspectives on related policies, power, and justice. Forest Policy and Economics, 142, 102775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102775

Harrahill, K., Macken-Walsh, Á., & O’Neill, E. (2023). Prospects for the bioeconomy in achieving a Just Transition: Perspectives from Irish beef farmers on future pathways. Journal of Regional Studies, 100, 103020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103020

Hassink, R. (2001). Towards regionally embedded innovation support systems in South Korea? Case studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyonggi. Urban Studies, 38(8), 1373-1395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120080341

Hausknost, D., Schiefl, E., Lauk, C., & Kalt, G. (2017). A transition to which bioeconomy? An exploration of diverging techno-political choices. Sustainability, 9(4), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU9040669

Häyry, M., & Laihonen, M. (2024). Situating a sustainable bioeconomy strategy on a map of justice: A solution and its problems. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02720-w

Heidenreich, M., & Mattes, J. (2012). Regional embeddedness of multinational companies and their limits: A typology. In M. Heidenreich (Ed.), Innovation and institutional embeddedness of multinational companies (pp. 29-58). Edward Elgar.

Hermans, F.L.P. (2021). Bioclusters and sustainable regional development. In S.R. Sedita & S. Blasi (Eds.), Rethinking clusters: Place-based value creation in sustainability transitions (pp. 81-91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61923-7_6

Herwix, A., Haj-Bolouri, A., Rossi, M., Tremblay, M. C., Purao, S., & Gregor, S. (2022). Ethics in information systems and design science research: Five perspectives. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 50(1), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05028

Hinderer, S., Brändle, L., & Kuckertz, A. (2021). Transition to a sustainable bioeconomy. Sustainability, 13(15), 8232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158232

Hoes, A-C., van der Burg, S., & Overbeek, G. (2021). Transitioning responsibly toward a circular bioeconomy: Using stakeholder workshops to reveal market dependencies. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 34, 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09862-3

Holland, C., McCarthy, A., Ferri, P., & Shapira, P. (2024). Innovation intermediaries at the convergence of digital technologies, sustainability, and governance: A case study of AI-enabled engineering biology. Technovation, 129, 102875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102875

Holmgren, S., Giurca, A., Johansson, J., Kanarp, C. S., Stenius, T., & Fischer, K. (2022). Whose transformation is this? Unpacking the ‘apparatus of capture’ in Sweden’s bioeconomy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.11.005

Holz, J. R. (2023). Threatened sustainability: Extractivist tendencies in the forest-based bioeconomy in Finland. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01300-9

Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. K., Loorbach, D. (2017). Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transition, 27, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007

Isaksen, A., Trippl, M., & Mayer, H. (2022). Regional innovation systems in an era of grand societal challenges: Reorientation versus transformation. European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2125–2138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2084226

Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 79, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017

Janssen, M., Torrens, J., Wesseling, J., & Wanzenböck, I. (2021). The promises and premises of mission-oriented innovation policy—A reflection and ways forward. Science and Public Policy, 48(3), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCIPOL/SCAA072

Joly, P.-B. (2010). On the economics of techno-scientific promises. In M. Akrich, Y. Barthe, F. Muniesa, & P. Mustar (Eds.), Débordements: Mélanges offerts à Michel Callon (pp. 203–222). Presses des Mines. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.703

Jurowetzki, R., Lema, R., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2018). Combining innovation systems and global value chains for development: Towards a research agenda. The European Journal of Development Research, 30, 364-388. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0137-4

Kanda, W. (2023). Systems and ecosystems in the circular economy: What’s the difference? Journal of Circular Economy, 1(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.55845/RMDN3752

Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2023). Mission-oriented innovation policies in Europe: From normative to epistemic turn? UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2023-09). Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2023-09

Kern, F., Rogge, K.S., & Howlett, M. (2019). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy, 48(10), 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832

Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48, 1062-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006

Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008

Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2018). Dynamics of policy change and intermediation: The arduous transition towards low-energy homes in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.032

Kivimaa, P., & Morgan, K. (2023). Multilevel governance, sustainability transitions and the experimentalist turn. In S. Schwaag Serger, L. Soete, & J. Stierna (Eds.), The square: Putting place-based innovation policy for sustainability at the centre of policymaking (pp. 105-123). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/135706

Klingler-Vidra, R., Glennie, A., & Lawrence, C.S. (2022). Inclusive innovation. Routledge.

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Houghton Mifflin.

Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111

Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x

Lang, S., Minnucci, G., Mueller, M., & Schlaile, M. P. (2023). The role of consumers in business model innovations for a sustainable circular bioeconomy. Sustainability, 15(12), 9573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129573

Leipold, S., Petit-Boix, A., Luo, A., Helander, H., Simoens, M., Ashton, W.S., Babbitt, C.W., Bala, A., Bening, C.R., Birkved, M., Blomsma, F., Boks, C., Boldrin, A., Deutz, P., Domenech, T., Ferronato, N., Gallego-Schmid, A., Giurco, D., Hobson, K., … Xue, B. (2023). Lessons, narratives, and research directions for a sustainable circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27, 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13346

Lepore, D. (2023). Intermediaries in innovation systems: Match or mismatch? Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01566-5

Lindner, R., Daimer, S., Beckert, B., Heyen, N., Koehler, J., Teufel, B., Warnke, P., & Wydra, S. (2016). Addressing directionality: Orientation failure and the systems of innovation heuristic: Towards reflexive governance. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 25.

Losacker, S., Hansmeier, H., Horbach, J., Liefner, I. (2023). The geography of environmental innovation: A critical review and agenda for future research. Review of Regional Research, 43, 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-023-00193-6

Lühmann, M., & Vogelpohl, T. (2023). The bioeconomy in Germany: A failing political project? Ecological Economics, 207, 107783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107783

March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

Martin, H., Grundel, I., & Dahlström, M. (2023). Reconsidering actor roles in regional innovation systems: Transformative industrial change in the forest-based bioeconomy. Regional Studies, 57(9), 1636–1648. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2151581

Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2010). The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landscape. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 62-92). Edward Elgar.

Martin, R. (2021). Path dependence and the spatial economy: Putting history in its place. In M.M. Fischer, P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional science, 2nd edition (pp. 1265-1289). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60723-7_34

Marty, P., Dermine-Brullot, S., Madelrieux, S., Fleuet, J., & Lescoat, P. (2022). Transformation of socioeconomic metabolism due to development of the bioeconomy: The case of northern Aube (France). European Planning Studies, 30(7), 1212–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1889475

Mattes, J., Huber, A., & Koehrsen, J. (2015). Energy transitions in small-scale regions – What we can learn from a regional innovation systems perspective. Energy Policy, 78, 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.011

McCauley, D., & Heffron, R. (2018). Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy, 119, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014

McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013). The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability, 5, 2589-2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589

Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. (Edited by D. Wright). Earthscan.

Mendoza Barajas, E. (2022). Dedicated innovation systems for local sustainability transformations in the Global South. Doctoral Dissertation, Institute of Economics, University of Hohenheim. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:100-opus-20446

Morales, D. (2021). Spaces of the forest-based bioeconomy in Finnish Lapland and Catalonia: practitioners, narratives and forgotten spatialities. Fennia – International Journal of Geography, 199(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.109523

Morales, D., Dahlström, M. (2023). Smart specialization and participatory processes in green path renewal. Analysis of the forest-based bioeconomy in sparsely populated regions in the Nordics. European Planning Studies, 31(8), 1734-1753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2106120

Morena, E., Krause, D., & Stevis, D. (Eds.). (2020). Just transitions: Social justice in the shift towards a low-carbon world. Pluto Press.

Morone, P., D’Amato, D., Befort, N., & Yilan, G. (2023). The circular bioeconomy: Theories and tools for economists and sustainability scientists. Cambridge University Press.

Mubareka, S., Giuntoli, J., Sanchez Lopez, J., Lasarte Lopez, J., M’barek, R., Ronzon, T., Renner, A., & Avraamides, M. (2023). Trends in the EU bioeconomy. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/835046

Muller, J.Z. (2018). The tyranny of metrics. Princeton University Press.

Muscat, A., de Olde, E., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Van Zanten, H.H.E., Metze, T.A.P., Termeer, C.J.A.M., van Ittersum, M.K., & de Boer, I.J.M. (2021). Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular economy. Nature Food, 2, 561-566.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7

Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36(7), 1016-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003

Nowotny, H. (2003). Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780461

Onyeali, W., Schlaile, M. P., & Winkler, B. (2023). Navigating the biocosmos: Cornerstones of a bioeconomic utopia. Land, 12(6), 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061212

Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093

Parks, D. (2022). Directionality in transformative innovation policy: Who is giving directions? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.02.005

Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001

Pauliuk, S., & Hertwich, E. G. (2015). Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies. Ecological Economics, 119, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.012

Pel, B., Wittmayer, J.M., Avelino, F., Loorbach, D., & de Geus, T. (2023). How to account for the dark sides of social innovation? Transitions directionality in renewable energy prosumerism. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 49, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100775

Pfau, S.F., Hagens, J.E., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A.J.M. (2014). Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research. Sustainability, 6(3), 1222-1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031222

Pohl, C., Truffer, B., & Hirsch-Hadorn, G. (2017). Addressing wicked problems through transdisciplinary research. In R. Frodeman, J.T. Klein, & R.C.d.S. Pachero (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, 2nd edition (pp. 319-331). Oxford University Press.

ProClim- (1997). Research on sustainability and global change: Visions in science policy by Swiss researchers. ProClim- Forum for Climate and Global Change, Swiss Academy of Sciences.

Purvis, B., Celebi, D., & Pansera, M. (2023). A framework for a responsible circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 400, 136679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136679

Pyka, A. (2014). Avoiding evolutionary inefficiencies in innovation networks. Prometheus, 32(3), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2015.1011877

Pyka, A. (2017). Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: Creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0079-7

Pyka, A., Ari, E., Alva-Ferrari, A., & Urmetzer, S. (2022). The bioeconomy transition process: Sailing through storms and doldrums in unknown waters. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 38(2), 34-61. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0110

Pyka, A., Kudic, M., & Müller, M. (2019). Systemic interventions in regional innovation systems: Entrepreneurship, knowledge accumulation and regional innovation. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566702

Pyka, A., Lang, S., & Stöber, L.F. (2023). A sustainable knowledge-based economy analysis. In L. Adatto, C. Aouinaït, S.T.K. Le, & M. Mongo (Eds.), Innovation ecosystems in the new economic era: Digital revolution and ecological transition (pp. 99-127). Peter Lang.

Ramcilovic-Suominen, S. (2023). Envisioning just transformations in and beyond the EU bioeconomy: Inspirations from decolonial environmental justice and degrowth. Sustainability Science, 18, 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01091-5

Rau, T.J. (2023). Collective power: Patterns for a self-organized future. Sociocracy For All.

Rehfeld, D. (2019). Responsible research and innovation (RRI) and regional innovation studies (RIS) – reflecting on the normative aspects. European Planning Studies, 27(12), 2344–2358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1667308

Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Rutten, R., & Boekema, F. (2007). Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9), 1834–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.012

Sattler, C. (2022). Using Process Net-Map to analyze governance innovations in the forestry sector. Ecosystem Services, 55, 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101433

Schiffer, E., & Hauck, J. (2010). Net-Map: Collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods, 22(3), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10374798

Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W.E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011

Schlaile, M.P., Kask, J., Brewer, J., Bogner, K., Urmetzer, S., & de Witt, A. (2022). Proposing a cultural evolutionary perspective for dedicated innovation systems: Bioeconomy transitions and beyond. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 38(2), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0108

Schlaile, M.P., & Urmetzer, S. (2021). Transitions to sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho, A.M. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, & T. Wall (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Decent Work and Economic Growth (pp. 1067-1081). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95867-5_52

Schlaile, M.P., Urmetzer, S., Blok, V., Andersen, A.D., Timmermans, J., Mueller, M., Fagerberg, J., & Pyka, A. (2017). Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously. Sustainability, 9(12), 2253. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122253

Schlaile, M.P., Urmetzer, S., Ehrenberger, M.B., & Brewer, J. (2021). Systems entrepreneurship: A conceptual substantiation of a novel entrepreneurial “species”. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00850-6

Schlaile, M.P., Zeman, J., & Mueller, M. (2018). It’s a match! Simulating compatibility-based learning in a network of networks. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, 1111-1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0579-z

Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.

Schramm, M. (2022). Relational processes in Whitehead’s metaphysics and Commons’ economics. The relevance of cosmology for economic theory. In L. Biggero, D. de Jongh, B. Priddat, J. Wieland, A. Zicari, & D. Fischer (Eds.), The relational view of economics: A new research agenda for the study of relational transactions (pp. 249-275). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86526-9_13

Scoones, I., Stirling, A. (Eds.) (2020). The politics of uncertainty: Challenges of transformation. Routledge.

Sjøtun, S.G., & Njøs, R. (2019). Green reorientation of clusters and the role of policy: ‘The normative’ and ‘the neutral’ route. European Planning Studies, 27, 2411-2430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1630370

Skjølsvold, T. M., Coenen, L. (2021). Are rapid and inclusive energy and climate transitions oxymorons? Towards principles of responsible acceleration. Energy Research & Social Science, 79, 1021164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102164

Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001

Starke, J. R., Metze, T. A. P., Candel, J. J. L., Dewulf, A. R. P. J., & Termeer, K. J. A. M. (2023). ‘Green future’ versus ‘planetary boundaries’? Evolving online discourse coalitions in European bioeconomy conflicts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, 139058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139058

Starke, J. R., Metze, T. A. P., Candel, J. J. L., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2022). Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition. Ambio, 51(10), 2079–2090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01730-2

Stevis, D. (2023). Just transitions: Promise and contestation. Cambridge University Press.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Stöber, L. F., Boesino, M., Pyka, A., & Schuenemann, F. (2023). Bioeconomy innovation networks in urban regions: The case of Stuttgart. Land, 12(4), 935. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040935

Suitner, J., Haider, W., & Philipp, S. (2023). Social innovation for regional energy transition? An agency perspective on transformative change in non-core regions. Regional Studies, 57(8), 1498–1510. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2053096

Swilling, M. (2020). The age of sustainability: Just transitions in a complex world. Routledge.

Tartaruga, I., Sperotto, F., & Carvalho, L. (2024). Addressing inclusion, innovation, and sustainability challenges through the lens of economic geography: Introducing the Hierarchical Regional Innovation System. Geography and Sustainability, 5(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.10.002

Tapia, C., Bianchi, M., Pallaske, G., & Bassi, A. (2021). Towards a territorial definition of a circular economy: Exploring the role of territorial factors in closed-loop systems. European Planning Studies, 29, 1438-1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1867511

Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1779–1795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140

Tödtling, F., Trippl, M., & Desch, V. (2022). New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges. European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2139–2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1951177

Traub, S., & Kittel., B. (Eds.) (2020). Need-based distributive justice: An interdisciplinary perspective. Springer.

Trippl, M. (2023). Challenge-oriented regional innovation systems and strategies for sustainability transitions. In S. Schwaag Serger, L. Soete, & S. Stierna (Eds.), The Square: Putting place-based innovation policy for sustainability at the centre of policymaking (pp. 62-69). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/135706

Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., & Kastrup, J. (2024). Challenge-oriented regional innovation systems: Towards a research agenda. Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research. https://investigacionesregionales.org/en/article/challenge-oriented-regional-innovation-systems-towards-a-research-agenda/

Upham, P., Sovacool, B., & Ghosh, B. (2022). Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167, 112699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112699

Urmetzer, S., Lask, J., Vargas-Carpintero, R., & Pyka, A. (2020). Learning to change: Transformative knowledge for building a sustainable bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 167, 106435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106435

Urmetzer, S., & Pyka, A. (2017). Varieties of knowledge-based bioeconomies. In S. Dabbert, I. Lewandowski, J. Weiss, & A. Pyka (Eds.), Knowledge-driven developments in the bioeconomy (pp. 57–82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58374-7_4

Urmetzer, S., Schlaile, M.P., Bogner, K.B., Mueller, M., & Pyka, A. (2018). Exploring the dedicated knowledge base of a transformation towards a sustainable bioeconomy. Sustainability, 10(6), 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061694

Urmetzer, S., Schlaile, M.P., Blok, V., & Pyka, A. (2022). Quo vadis, bioeconomy? The necessity of normative considerations in the transition. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 35(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09875-y

Uyarra, E., Ribeiro, B., & Dale-Clough, L. (2019). Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: Responsibility and the quest for public value. European Planning Studies, 27(12), 2359–2375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1609425

Vanacore, E., Giné, L. F., Hunka, A. D. (2023). Optimising public procurement through circular practice: The power of intermediation. Journal of Circular Economy, 1(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.55845/GXGR4467

Veraart, R., Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2023). Ecomodernism and the libidinal economy: Towards a critical conception of technology in the bio-based economy. Philosophy & Technology, 36(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00617-8

Villalba Morales, M. L., Ruiz Castañeda, W., & Robledo Velásquez, J. (2023). Configuration of inclusive innovation systems: Function, agents and capabilities. Research Policy, 52(7), 104796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104796

Vivien, F.-D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027

Vogel, J., Porras, F., Schlaile, M.P., Hector, V., Plesner Volkdal, C., & Xu, Z. (2023). The normative dimension of transdisciplinary cooperation. European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes: Debating Development Research (12/12/2023). https://www.developmentresearch.eu/?p=1721

Vogt, M., & Frankenreiter, I. (2022). Bioeconomy: The innovative twin of sustainability. Sustainability, 14(22), 14924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214924

von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 51-74). Wiley.

Waddock, S. (2023). Catalyzing transformation: Making system change happen. Business Expert Press.

Wanzenböck, I., Scherngell, T., & Brenner, T. (2014). Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: A comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, co-patents and co-publications. The Annals of Regional Science, 53(2), 337-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0588-7

Wanzenböck, I., Wesseling, J.H., Frenken, K., Hekkert, M.P., & Weber, K.M. (2020). A framework for mission-oriented innovation policy: Alternative pathways through the problem-solution space. Science and Public Policy, 47(4), 474-489. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa027

Warnke, P., Koschatzky, K., Dönitz, E., Zenker, A., Stahlecker, T., Som, O., Cuhls, K., & Güth, S. (2016). Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 49.

Watkins, A., McCarthy, A., Holland, C., Shapira, P. (2023) Public biofoundries as innovation intermediaries: the integration of translation, sustainability, and responsibility. The Journal of Technology Transfer, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10039-5

WBCSD. (2020). Circular bioeconomy: The business opportunity contributing to a sustainable world. WBCSD. https://www.wbcsd.org/contentwbc/download/10806/159810/1

Weber, K.M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015

Weisz, H. (2011). The probability of the improbable: Society-nature coevolution. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 93(4), 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2011.00386.x

Wiarda, M., Janssen, M.J., Coenen, T.B.J., & Doorn, N. (2024). Responsible mission governance: An integrative framework and research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 50, 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100820

Wilde, K., & Hermans, F. (2024). Transition towards a bioeconomy: Comparison of conditions and institutional work in selected industries. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 50, 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100814

Wilke, U., & Pyka, A. (2024a). Assessing the relevance of different proximity dimensions for knowledge exchange and (co-)creation in sustainability-oriented innovation networks. Sustainability Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01463-z

Wilke, U., & Pyka, A. (2024b). Sustainable innovations, knowledge and the role of proximity: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12617

Wilke, U., Schlaile, M.P., Urmetzer, S., Mueller, M., Bogner, K., & Pyka, A. (2021). Time to say ‘good buy’ to the passive consumer? A conceptual review of the consumer in the bioeconomy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 34(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09861-4

Wittmayer, J.M., Hielscher, S., Rogge, K.S., & Weber, K.M. (2024). Advancing the understanding of social innovation in sustainability transitions: Exploring processes, politics, and policies for accelerating transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 50, 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100805

Wohlfahrt, J., Ferchaud, F., Gabrielle, B., Godard, C., Kurek, B., Loyce, C., & Therond, O. (2019). Characteristics of bioeconomy systems and sustainability issues at the territorial scale. A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 898-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.385

Wolfram, M. (2016). Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities, 51, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011

Young, I.M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.

Young, I.M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford University Press.

Ziegler, R. (2020). Innovation, ethics and our common futures: A collaborative philosophy. Edward Elgar.

Ziegler, R. (2023). Exnovation. In J. Howaldt & C. Kaletka (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social innovation (pp. 56-60). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800373358.ch10

Zscheischler, J. (2021). Transdisciplinary research in land use science—developments, criticism and empirical findings from research practice. In T. Weith, T. Barkmann, N. Gaasch, S. Rogga, C. Strauß, & J. Zscheischler (Eds), Sustainable land management in a European context (pp. 127–143), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50841-8_7

Zscheischler, J., & Rogga, S. (2015). Transdisciplinarity in land use science–a review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices. Futures, 65, 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005

Zscheischler, J., Brunsch, R., Rogga, S., & Scholz, R. W. (2022). Perceived risks and vulnerabilities of employing digitalization and digital data in agriculture–Socially robust orientations from a transdisciplinary process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132034

Zukauskaite, E. (2018). Variety of regional innovation systems and their institutional characteristics. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems – theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 41-60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_3

Zwart, H., Barbosa Mendes, A., & Blok, V. (2024). Epistemic inclusion: A key challenge for global RRI. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1), 2326721. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2326721