Market Dynamics in the Circular Economy: A Case Study of the Adjacent Biofertilizer and Biogas Markets

This study explores the interlinked development of Sweden’s biogas and biofertilizer markets as part of efforts to close resource loops in a circular economy. While biogas benefits from robust policy support and a clear energy narrative, biofertilizers face persistent challenges related to marketization, pricing, certification, and public perception. Applying a constructivist market studies approach together with a lens of concerned markets, the paper investigates how societal and sector-specific concerns interact with market-shaping processes. Findings show that market formation is shaped by evolving exchange practices and material reconfigurations, efforts to validate biofertilizers through experimentation and certification, and shifting narratives that reposition biofertilizers from waste by-products to valuable contributors to soil health and circularity. The paper calls for integrated policy frameworks that align energy and nutrient recovery to support more balanced and sustainable market infrastructures

Alexander, P., Arneth, A., Henry, R., Maire, J., Rabin, S., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2022). High energy and fertilizer prices are more damaging than food export curtailment from Ukraine and Russia for food prices, health and the environment. Nature Food, 4(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00659-9

Araujo, L. (2007). Markets, market-making and marketing. Marketing Theory, 7(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10/cf6czb

ATL. (2021, December 30). Hans åkermarker är fulla av plastrester. ATL Lantbrukets Affärstidning, 73.

Augustinsson, H., Hellgren, A., & Andersson, L. (2022). Certified Biogödsel SPCR 120 2021. Avfall Sverige. https://www.avfallsverige.se/media/ocrdzv0y/spcr-a-rsrapport-2021.pdf

Avfall Sverige. (2018, February 20). Biogödsel idealbilden för kretsloppssamhället. Avfall Och Miljö, 2018/1.

Bocken, N. M. P., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103

Brett, N., Magnusson, T., & Andersson, H. (2023). From global climate goals to local practice—Mission-oriented policy enactment in three Swedish regions. Science and Public Policy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10/gr57xj

Caliskan, K. (2007). Price as a Market Device: Cotton Trading in Izmir Mercantile Exchange. The Sociological Review, 55(2_suppl), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00738.x

Callon, M. (2007). An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407084701

Callon, M., Méadel, C., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2002). The economy of qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123126

Caterino, D., Follador, A., Galbusera, J., Guffanti, D., Cocetta, G., Geuna, F., Dell’Orto, M., Scaglia, B., Passera, A., Riva, E., Casati, P., Ferrante, A., & Tambone, F. (2024). Evolution of Biogenic Nitrogen from Digestates for Lettuce Fertilization and the Effect on the Bacterial Community. Horticulturae, 10(7), 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10070685

Dahlin, J., Herbes, C., & Nelles, M. (2015). Biogas digestate marketing: Qualitative insights into the supply side. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 152–161. https://doi.org/10/f766bk

D’Antone, S., & Spencer, R. (2014). Concerns and marketization: The case of sustainable palm oil. In S. Geiger, D. Harrison, H. Kjellberg, & A. Mallard (Eds.), Concerned markets: Economic ordering for multiple values. Edward Elgar Publishing.

de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001

Doganova, L., & Karnøe, P. (2015). Clean and Profitable: Entangling Valuations in Environmental Entrepreneurship. In A. Berthoin Antal, M. Hutter, & D. Stark (Eds.), Clean and Profitable: Entangling Valuations in Environmental Entrepreneurship. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273575122

Du, C., Abdullah, J. J., Greetham, D., Fu, D., Yu, M., Ren, L., Li, S., & Lu, D. (2018). Valorization of food waste into biofertiliser and its field application. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 273–284. https://doi.org/10/gsqx2j

Ekman Burgman, L., & Wallsten, B. (2021). Should the Sludge Hit the Farm? – How Chemo-Social Relations Affect Policy Efforts to Circulate Phosphorus in Sweden. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27(April), 1488–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.011

Fallde, M., & Eklund, M. (2015). Towards a sustainable socio-technical system of biogas for transport: The case of the city of Linköping in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.089

Feiz, R., Johansson, M., Lindkvist, E., Moestedt, J., Påledal, S. N., & Ometto, F. (2022). The biogas yield, climate impact, energy balance, nutrient recovery, and resource cost of biogas production from household food waste—A comparison of multiple cases from Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134536

Feiz, R., Larsson, M., Ekstrand, E.-M., Hagman, L., Ometto, F., & Tonderski, K. (2021). The role of biogas solutions for enhanced nutrient recovery in biobased industries—Three case studies from different industrial sectors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105897

Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Wanzenböck, I. (2023). Towards a problem-oriented regional industrial policy: Possibilities for public intervention in framing, valuation and market formation. Regional Studies, 57(6), 998–1010. https://doi.org/10/gp6dtz

Frankel, C., Ossandón, J., & Pallesen, T. (2019). The organization of markets for collective concerns and their failures. Economy and Society, 48(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10/gf6b32

García-Quevedo, J., Jové-Llopis, E., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2020). Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium-sized firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2450–2464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2513

Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003

Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., & Mallard, A. (2014). Being concerned about markets. In S. Geiger, D. Harrison, H. Kjellberg, & A. Mallard (Eds.), Concerned markets: Economic ordering for multiple values. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gregson, N., Watkins, H., & Calestani, M. (2013). Political markets: Recycling, economization and marketization. Economy and Society, 42(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2012.661625

Holden, P. B., Edwards, N. R., Ridgwell, A., Wilkinson, R. D., Fraedrich, K., Lunkeit, F., Pollitt, H., Mercure, J. F., Salas, P., Lam, A., Knobloch, F., Chewpreecha, U., & Viñuales, J. E. (2018). Author Correction: Climate–carbon cycle uncertainties and the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change, 8(July), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0235-5

Joshi, S. K., & Gauraha, A. K. (2022). 24 – Global biofertilizer market: Emerging trends and opportunities. In R. Soni, D. C. Suyal, A. N. Yadav, & R. Goel (Eds.), Trends of Applied Microbiology for Sustainable Economy (pp. 689–697). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91595-3.00024-0

Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028

Kjellberg, H., & Helgesson, C. F. (2007). On the nature of markets and their practices. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593107076862

Kjellberg, H., Storbacka, K., Akaka, M., Chandler, J., Finch, J., Lindeman, S., Löbler, H., Mason, K., McColl-Kennedy, J., & Nenonen, S. (2012). Market futures/future markets: Research directions in the study of markets. Marketing Theory, 12(2), 219–223. https://doi.org/10/gmzbt3

Krav. (2023). Stallgödsel från konventionell produktion som inte är tillåten. https://regler.krav.se/unit/krav-regulation/4e87639d-5e9f-418f-aebd-42acd2336618;jsessionid=EC0F2DE8396ED1204845C23D11E2E7C9

Krav. (2025). 12.3 Gödsel- och jordförbättringsmedel. https://regler.krav.se/unit/krav-article/c3b078b8-68dc-4bf5-b05d-afcc2e751519

Kumawat, K. C., Keshani, Nagpal, S., & Sharma, P. (2021). Present scenario of bio-fertilizer production and marketing around the globe. In Biofertilizers (pp. 389–413). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821667-5.00028-2

Lamolinara, B., Pérez-Martínez, A., Guardado-Yordi, E., Guillén Fiallos, C., Diéguez-Santana, K., & Ruiz-Mercado, G. J. (2022). Anaerobic digestate management, environmental impacts, and techno-economic challenges. Waste Management, 140, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.035

Lantz, M., Börjesson, P., Svensson, M., & Björnsson, L. (2007). The prospects for an expansion of biogas systems in Sweden—Incentives, barriers and potentials. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1819–1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.05.017

Larsson, M., Tonderski, K., Metson, G., & Quttineh, N.-H. (2023). Towards a more circular biobased economy and nutrient use on Gotland: Finding suitable locations for biogas plants (Biogas Research Center (BRC) Report) [Biogas Research Center (BRC) Report]. Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/report.diva-194234

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social Introduction: How to Resume the Task of Tracing. Oxford University Press.

Lazarevic, D., & Valve, H. (2020). Niche politics: Biogas, technological flexibility and the economisation of resource recovery. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35(May 2019), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.016

Lehtokunnas, T., & Pyyhtinen, O. (2023). Biowaste as fluid matter: Valuing biogas and biofertilisers as assets in the Finnish biogas sector. Journal of Cultural Economy, 16(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10/gsjfzf

Leipold, S., Weldner, K., & Hohl, M. (2021). Do we need a ‘circular society’? Competing narratives of the circular economy in the French food sector. Ecological Economics, 187, 107086. https://doi.org/10/gjx8cv

Mdlambuzi, T., Tsubo, M., & Muchaonyerwa, P. (2022). Maize ( Zea mays L.) Production from Co-application of Biogas Slurry with Chemical Fertilizer and Effects on Soil Quality in a Semi-arid Region of South Africa. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53(19), 2574–2583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2072512

Nenonen, S., Kjellberg, H., Pels, J., Cheung, L., Lindeman, S., Mele, C., Sajtos, L., & Storbacka, K. (2014). A new perspective on market dynamics: Market plasticity and the stability–fluidity dialectics. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 269–289. https://doi.org/10/f6j27p

Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2020). Don’t adapt, shape! Use the crisis to shape your minimum viable system – And the wider market. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.022

Nevzorova, T., & Kutcherov, V. (2019). Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100414

Nøjgaard, M. Ø., & Bajde, D. (2021). Comparison and cross-pollination of two fields of market systems studies. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10/gsb4tw

Odhner, P. B., Sernhed, K., Svensson, S.-E., & Juhlin, M. (2015). Biogödsel i Skåne en inventering och marknadsanalys (No. 2015:25). Fakulteten för landskapsarkitektur, trädgårds- och växtproduktionsvetenskap, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet. https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/12649/17/svensson_et_al_150929_1.pdf

Olsson, L., & Fallde, M. (2015). Waste(d) potential: A socio-technical analysis of biogas production and use in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.015

Ottosson, M., Magnusson, T., & Andersson, H. (2020). Shaping sustainable markets—A conceptual framework illustrated by the case of biogas in Sweden. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.008

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.

Peng, W., & Pivato, A. (2019). Sustainable Management of Digestate from the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Food Waste Under the Concepts of Back to Earth Alternatives and Circular Economy. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 10(2), 465–481. https://doi.org/10/gnj22s

Regeringskansliet. (2022, March 25). Stöd till produktion av biogas [Text]. Regeringskansliet; Regeringen och Regeringskansliet. https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2022/03/stod-till-produktion-av-biogas/

Reijonen, S., & Tryggestad, K. (2012). The dynamic signification of product qualities: On the possibility of “greening” markets. Consumption Markets & Culture, 15(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2012.654961

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Scott, C., & Medaugh, M. (2017). Axial Coding. In J. axial, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (1st ed., pp. 1–2). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0012

Selvaggi, R., Pecorino, B., Trovato, G., & Pappalardo, G. (2022). Is the information sufficient to create a new market for digestate? Aestimum, 80, 3–14. https://doi.org/10/gsd6sd

Sharma, P., Bano, A., Verma, K., Yadav, M., Varjani, S., Singh, S. P., & Tong, Y. W. (2023). Food waste digestate as biofertilizer and their direct applications in agriculture. Bioresource Technology Reports, 23, 101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101515

Sica, D., Esposito, B., Supino, S., Malandrino, O., & Sessa, M. R. (2023). Biogas-based systems: An opportunity towards a post-fossil and circular economy perspective in Italy. Energy Policy, 182, 113719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113719

Small, M. L. (2011). How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657

SOU. (2019). Mer biogas! För ett hållbart Sverige Betänkande (SOU 2019:63). Statens Offentliga Utredningar. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/forordning-2022225-om-statligt-stod-till_sfs-2022-225/

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (2024, August 21). SLU Biogas Center. SLU Biogas Center. https://www.slu.se/en/Collaborative-Centres-and-Projects/biogas-at-slu/

Ulmanen, J. H., Verbong, G. P. J., & Raven, R. P. J. M. (2009). Biofuel developments in Sweden and the Netherlands: Protection and socio-technical change in a long-term perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(6–7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2008.10.001

Valve, H., Lazarevic, D., & Humalisto, N. (2021). When the circular economy diverges: The co-evolution of biogas business models and material circuits in Finland. Ecological Economics, 185, 107025. https://doi.org/10/gjh8gx

Vaneeckhaute, C., Styles, D., Prade, T., Adams, P., Thelin, G., Rodhe, L., Gunnarsson, I., & D’Hertefeldt, T. (2018). Closing nutrient loops through decentralized anaerobic digestion of organic residues in agricultural regions: A multi-dimensional sustainability assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.027

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

Vu, M. T., Duong, H. C., Wang, Q., Ansari, A., Cai, Z., Hoang, N. B., & Nghiem, L. D. (2023). Recent technological developments and challenges for phosphorus removal and recovery toward a circular economy. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 30, 103114. https://doi.org/10/gsmg9j

Brett, N. &  Ekman Burgman, L. (2025). Market Dynamics in the Circular Economy: A Case Study of the Adjacent Biofertilizer and Biogas Markets. Journal of Circular Economy, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.55845/CGLS5652

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Nancy Brett[1][*], Linus Ekman Burgman[1]

• [1]Department of Thematic Studies: Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
• [*]Corresponding author: [email protected]