Journal of Circular Economy

An applied scholarly journal on circular economy

Volume 2, Issue 1

December 2024

View PDF

Do We Save the Environment by Buying Second-Hand Clothes? The Environmental Impacts of Second-Hand Textile Fashion and the Influence of Consumer Choices

Astrid Klooster, Blanca C. Bellostas, Marvin Henry, Li Shen

Abstract

Re-use is a high R-ladder strategy in a circular economy. The environmental impacts of re-use are often underreported. This research aims to gain insights into second-hand clothing's lifecycle impact. Life cycle assessments were conducted for four frequently traded second-hand clothing items, namely t-shirts, dress, trousers and sweaters. Three types of consumers were distinguished (primary user, primary conscious user and second-hand user) and three behaviour scenarios were modelled (fashionable, average and attached consumers). We found that within the same behaviour scenario, embracing second-hand consumption instead of buying new clothes leads to up to 42% lower impacts for climate change and cumulative energy demand, 42-53% for freshwater eutrophication, and 35-53% for water scarcity footprint per use. Reuse mitigates impacts, and is particularly beneficial for high-production impact clothing items. Consuming a rarely used second-hand item can even lead to higher impacts than using a new clothing item which has longevity.

Keywords

Lifecycle Assessment, Clothing, Fashion, Reuse, Re-Commerce, Circular Economy, Consumer Behaviour

How to cite this article?

Bellostas, B. C., Henry, M., Klooster, A., Shen, L. (2024). Do We Save the Environment by Buying Second-Hand Clothes? The Environmental Impacts of Second-Hand Textile Fashion and the Influence of Consumer Choices. Journal of Circular Economy. https://doi.org/10.55845/ZZUG7076.

References

AISE. (2019). Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) Household Heavy Duty Liquid Laundry Detergents (HDLLD) for machine wash.

Amicarelli, V., Bux, C. (2022). Quantifying textile streams and recycling prospects in Europe by material flow analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 97 (2022), 106878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106878

Babel, N., Toma, A., & Sivanandan, A. (2019). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of second-hand vs new clothing Prepared for ThredUP 2. www.greenstory.ca

Beton, Adrien., Cordella, M., Dodd, N., Boufateh, Ines., Wolf, O., Kougoulis, J., Dias, Debora., Desaxce, Marie., Perwueltz, Anne., Farrant, Laura., Gibon, Thomas., Le Guern, Yannick., & Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. (2014). Environmental improvement potential of textiles (IMPRO Textiles). Publications Office.

Boulay, A. M., Bare, J., Benini, L., Berger, M., Lathuillière, M. J., Manzardo, A., Margni, M., Motoshita, M., Núñez, M., Pastor, A. V., Ridoutt, B., Oki, T., Worbe, S., & Pfister, S. (2018). The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(2), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8

Castellani, V., Sala, S., & Mirabella, N. (2015). Beyond the throwaway society: A life cycle-based assessment of the environmental benefit of reuse. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 11(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1614

Çay, A. (2018). Energy consumption and energy saving potential in clothing industry. Energy, 159, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.128

Cody, R. (2012). Textile Engineering (first). Research World.

Cotton Incorporated. (2017). LCA UPDATE OF COTTON FIBER AND FABRIC LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY.

Daystar, J., Chapman, L., Moore, M., Pires, S., & Golden, J. (2019). Quantifying Apparel Consumer Use Behavior in Six Countries: Addressing a Data Need in Life Cycle Assessment Modeling. In JTATM (Vol. 11, Issue 1).

De Falco, F., Cocca, M., Avella, M., & Thompson, R. C. (2020). Microfiber Release to Water, Via Laundering, and to Air, via Everyday Use: A Comparison between Polyester Clothing with Differing Textile Parameters. Cite This: Environ. Sci. Technol, 54, 3296. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06892

Ellebaek Laursen, S., Bocken, N., Allwood, J. M., & Malvido de Rodríguez, C. (2006). Well dressed? The present and future sustainability of clothing and textiles in the United Kingdom. (Vol. 1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282358796

Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2024). A circular economy for textiles: the role of EPR policy.

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). A NEW TEXTILES ECONOMY: REDESIGNING FASHION’S FUTURE. http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications

Emmenegger, F., Bajaj, M., Nigam, A., Hossain, M., Mosharraf Hossain, M., & Noor Zürich, M. (2018). Life Cycle Inventories of textile products-India and Bangladesh for the SRI project. www.ifescu.ac.bd

European Commission. (2015). Closing the loop- An EU action plan for the Circular Economy COM(2015) 614 final.

European Commission. (2022). Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the textiles industry (final draft(. https://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2022-03/TXT_Final_draft_B-W.pdf

European Parliament (2024a). The impact of textile production and waste on the environment (infographic). Brussels: European Parliament.

European Parliament (2024b). MEPs call for tougher EU rules to reduce textiles and food waste. Press release. Brussels: European Parliament.

Farrant, L., Olsen, S. I., & Wangel, A. (2010). Environmental benefits from reusing clothes. In International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (Vol. 15, Issue 7, pp. 726–736). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0197-y

Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H.-J., Bauer, C., Doka, G., Dones, R., Hischier, R., Hellweg, S., Humbert, S., Köllner, T., Loerincik, Y., Margni, M., & Nemecek, T. (2007). Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories A joint initiative of the ETH domain and Swiss Federal Offices Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods Data v2.0 (2007). www.ecoinvent.org

Gwozdz, W., Nielsen, K. S., & Müller, T. (2017). An environmental perspective on clothing consumption: Consumer segments and their behavioral patterns. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050762

Hansen, J., Wenzel, H., & Larsen, H. F. (2007). EDIPTEX-Environmental assessment of textiles. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242656918

Harane, R. S., & Adivarekar, R. v. (2017). Sustainable processes for pre-treatment of cotton fabric. Textiles and Clothing Sustainability, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40689-016-0012-7

Harmsen, P., Scheffer, M., & Bos, H. (2021). Textiles for circular fashion: The logic behind recycling options. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179714

Hermesworld. (2018). Climate-friendly logistics | Hermes. https://www.hermesworld.com/int/about-us/responsibility/climate-environment/climate-friendly-logistics/

Huijbregts, M. A. J., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Elshout, P. M. F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Zijp, M., Hollander, A., & van Zelm, R. (2017). ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y

IPCC. (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.

IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Summary for policymakers.

Kaplan, E., & Koç, E. (2007). An investigation on Energy Consumption in Yarn Production with special reference to ring spinning. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 15(4).

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2017.09.005

Koç, E., & Çinçik, E. (2010). Analysis of Energy Consumption in Woven Fabric Production. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe (Vol. 18, Issue 2).

Köhler, A., Watson, D., Trzepacz, S., Löw, C., Liu, R., Danneck, J., … & Faraca, G. (2021). Circular economy perspectives in the EU textile sector. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Morley, N., Mcgill, I., Bartlett, C., & Deegan, K. (2009). Appendix I Maximising Reuse and Recycling of UK Clothing and Textiles EV0421 Technical Report Final report for Defra. www.oakdenehollins.co.uk

Nolimal, S. (2018). Life Cycle Assessment of Four Different Sweaters. DePaul Discoveries, 7(1). https://via.library.depaul.edu/depaul-disc/vol7/iss1/9

Nørup, N., Pihl, K., Damgaard, A., & Scheutz, C. (2019). Replacement rates for second-hand clothing and household textiles – A survey study from Malawi, Mozambique and Angola. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.06.177

Presutto, M., Faberi, S., Stamminger, R., Scialdoni, R., Mebane, W., & Esposito, R. (2007). Preparatory Studies for Eco-design Requirements of EuPs (Tender TREN/D1/40-2005) LOT 14: Domestic Washing Machines and Dishwashers Final Report Draft Version Tasks 1-2 Mr Wiliam Mebane, ISIS (Task 2.4, 4 and 5.4) Ms Rita Esposito, ISIS (Task 2.1 and 2.2).

PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2009). Ecodesign of Laundry Dryers Preparatory studies for Ecodesign requirements of Energy-using-Products (EuP)-Lot 16 Final Report. www.ecodryers.org

Quantis. (2018). MEASURING FASHION 2018 Environmental Impact of the Global Apparel and Footwear Industries Study Full report and methodological considerations. https://quantis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/measuringfashion_globalimpactstudy_full-report_quantis_cwf_2018a.pdf

Roos, S., Jönsson, C., Posner, S., Arvidsson, R., & Svanström, M. (2019). An inventory framework for inclusion of textile chemicals in life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(5), 838–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1537-6

Roos, S., & Peters, G. M. (2015). Three methods for strategic product toxicity assessment—the case of the cotton T-shirt. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(7), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0895-6

Roos, S., Sandin, G., Zamani, B., & Peters, G. (2015). Environmental assessment of Swedish fashion consumption Five garments-sustainable futures.

Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 184, pp. 353–365). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266

Sandin, G., Peters, G. M., & Svanström, M. (2015). Using the planetary boundaries framework for setting impact-reduction targets in LCA contexts. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(12), 1684–1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0984-6

Sandin, G., Zamani, B., & Peters, G. (2019). Environmental assessment of Swedish clothing consumption-six garments, sustainable futures The Laundry of Tomorrow View project ZeroPM: Zero Pollution of Persistent, Mobile Substances View project. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30502.27205

Schmidt, A., Watson, D., Roos, S., Askham, C., & Brunn Poulson, P. (2016). Gaining benefits from discarded textiles LCA of different treatment pathways.

Shen, L., Worrell, E., & Patel, M. K. (2012). Comparing life cycle energy and GHG emissions of bio-based PET, recycled PET, PLA, and man-made cellulosics. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 6(6), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1368

Stevenson, A., & Gmitrowicz, E. (2012). Study into consumer second-hand shopping behaviour to identify the re-use displacement affect. www.wrap.org.uk

Sule, A. (2012). Life cycle assessment of clothing production. In Research Journal of Chemical Sciences (Vol. 2, Issue 2). www.isca.in

Three Sizing Standards Such As Acrylic Sizing For Textile Warp Sizing Were Successfully Passed. (n.d.). Retrieved May 8, 2022, from http://www.sjfzxm.com/global/en/557751.html

Textile Exchange (2023). Materials Market Report. https://textileexchange.org/annual-report-2023/

Tobler-Rohr, M. (2011). Handbook of sustainable textile production. Woodhead Pubishing.

Tolvik. (2021). UK Energy from Waste Statistics-2020. www.tolvik.com.

United States Plastic Corp. (2008). What’s the difference between LDPE, LLDPE, MDPE, HDPE, XLPE and UHMW sheeting? | U.S. Plastic. https://www.usplastic.com/knowledgebase/article.aspx?contentkey=508

Van Der Velden, N. M., Patel, M. K., & Vogtländer, J. G. (2014). LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(2), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0626-9

Wilson, J. (2011). Fibres, yarns and fabrics: fundamental principles for the textile designer – ScienceDirect. Textile Design, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857092564.1.3

Woolridge, A. C., Ward, G. D., Phillips, P. S., Collins, M., & Gandy, S. (2006). Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: An UK energy saving perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 46(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.006

WRAP. (2011). Benefits of Reuse Case Study: Clothing. www.wrap.org.uk

WRAP. (2017). Valuing Our Clothes: the cost of UK fashion.

WRAP. (2024). Textiles market situation report.

Yin, R., Ling, Y. L., Fisher, R., Chen, Y., Li, M. J., Mu, W. L., & Huang, X. X. (2021). Viable approaches to increase the throughput of ring spinning: A critical review. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 323). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129116

Yurday, E. (2022). Average Cost of Electricity per kWh in the UK 2022 | NimbleFins. https://www.nimblefins.co.uk/average-cost-electricity-kwh-uk

Zamani, B., Svanström, M., Peters, G., & Rydberg, T. (2015). A Carbon Footprint of Textile Recycling: A Case Study in Sweden. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(4), 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/JIEC.12208

Copyright info

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

X

DSRPT is an education technology start-up in stealth mode.
Circular Economy is our first venture. We are on a mission to disrupt higher education. If you wish to learn more about us, drop us a message: dsrpt@circular-economy.org