April 2025
Outline
This paper contributes to the existing body of research on integrating economic geography approach with circular economy (CE) research by exploring how socio-cultural and spatial trajectories shape industrial CE ecosystems. Conceptually, we address this question by identifying economic geography parameters that catalyze the CE. Empirically, we conducted a qualitative case study on the regional electric vehicle battery metal ecosystem in Finland. Our findings reveal how complex regional factors govern the circulation of resources and materials. Two main implications are discussed: first, a deeper understanding of the contextual factors shaping CE development; second, a comprehensive view of the interplay between economic geography parameters that drive local CE implementation.
Lampinen, M., Lehtimäki, H. & Mielonen, N. (2025).Catalyzing the Circular Economy: Socio-cultural and Spatial Trajectories in Industrial Ecosystems. Journal of Circular Economy, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.55845/BHLO9795
Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2021). Circular economy ecosystems: A typology, definitions, and implications. In S. Teerikangas, T. Onkila, K. Koistinen & M. Mäkelä (Eds.), Research handbook of sustainability agency (pp. 260–276). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906035.00024
Arsova, S., Genovese, A., & Ketikidis, P. H. (2022). Implementing circular economy in a regional context: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, Article 133117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133117
Baumgartner, J., Bassens, D., & De Temmerman, N. (2024). Finding land for the circular economy: territorial dynamics and spatial experimentation in the post-industrial city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 17(3), 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae016
Beynon, M., Pickernell, D., Battisti, M., & Jones, P. (2024). A panel fsQCA investigation on European regional innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, Article 123042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123042
Bianchi, M., Cordella, M., & Menger, P. (2023). Regional monitoring frameworks for the circular economy: Implications from a territorial perspective. European Planning Studies, 31(1), 36– 54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2057185
Binz, C., Coenen, L., Murphy, J. T., & Truffer, B. (2020). Geographies of transition – From topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 1–3. https://doiorg.ezproxy.uef.fi:2443/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002
Blomberg, A., Kujala, J., & Heikkinen, A. (2023). Multi-stakeholder networks in a circular economy transition: A typology of stakeholder relationships. In J. Kujala, A. Heikkinen & A.
Blomberg (Eds.), Stakeholder engagement in a sustainable circular economy (pp. 133–164). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bolger, K., & Doyon, A. (2019). Circular cities: Exploring local government strategies to facilitate a circular economy. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2184–2205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1642854
Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273– 302. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi022
Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2018). Evolutionary economic geography. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, M. S. Getler, & D. Wójcik (Eds.), New Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 213–229). Oxford University Press.
Bourdin, S., Galliano, D., & Gonçalves, A. (2022). Circularities in territories: Opportunities & challenges. European Planning Studies, 30(7), 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1973174
Bourdin, S., & Torre, A. (2024). Economic geography’s contribution to understanding the circular economy. Journal of Economic Geography, lbae040, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbae040
Calzolari, T., Bimpizas-Pinis, M., Genovese, A., & Brint, A. (2023). Understanding the relationship between institutional pressures, supply chain integration and the adoption of circular economy practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, Article 139686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139686
Chembessi, C., Bourdin, S., & Torre, A. (2024). Towards a territorialisation of the circular economy: The proximity of stakeholders and resources matters. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 17(3), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae007
Chu, H., Hassink, R., & Yilmaz, S. (2023). Fragmented or engaged pluralism in economic geography? Progress in Human Geography, 48(3), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325231219697
Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
Corradini, C., & Vanino, E. (2022). Path dependency, regional variety and the dynamics of new firm creation in rooted and pioneering industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 22(3), 631– 651. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab021
Davies, A. R., Evenhuis, E., Willams, J., Avoyan, E., & Tyler, P. (2024). Critical geographies of the circular economy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 17(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae028
de Abreu, M. C. S., & Ceglia, D. (2018). On the implementation of a circular economy: The role of institutional capacity-building through industrial symbiosis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.001
Deutz, P., Jonas, A. E. G., Newsholme, A., Pusz, M., Rogers, H. A., Affolderbach, J., Baumgartner, R. J., & Ramos, T. B. (2024). The role of place in the development of a circular economy: A critical analysis of potential for social redistribution in Hull, UK. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 17(3), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae002
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2016). Qualitative methods in business research (2nd ed.). Sage.
Gatell, I. S., & Avella, L. (2024). Impact of Industry 4.0 and circular economy on lean culture and leadership: Assessing digital green lean as a new concept. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 30(1), Article 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2023.100232
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Getler, M. S. (2018). Institutions, geography, and economic life. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, M. S. Getler, & D. Wójcik (Eds.), New Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 230–242). Oxford University Press.
Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
Harala, L., Alkki, L., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Al-Najjar, A., & Malmqvist, T. (2023). Industrial ecosystem renewal towards circularity to achieve the benefits of reuse – Learning from circular construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, Article 135885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135885
Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2017). Sketching the contours of an integrative paradigm of economic geography (Papers in Innovation Studies No. 2017/12) [Working paper]. CIRCLE – Centre for Innovation Research, Lund University. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32158.64322
Heiberg, J., Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2020). The geography of technology legitimation: How multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography, 96(5), 470–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189
Jambou, M., Torre, A., Dermine‑Brullot, S., & Bourdin, S. (2022). Inter‑firm cooperation and local industrial ecology processes: Evidence from three French case studies. The Annals of Regional Science, 68, 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01088-5
Jokinen, A., Jokinen, P., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Kokko, M., Kujala, J., Lehtimäki, H., & Nieminen, J. (2023). Catalysts accelerating circular economy transition in urban regeneration. In H. Lehtimäki, L. Aarikka-Stenroos, A. Jokinen, & P. Jokinen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of catalysts for a sustainable circular economy (pp. 21–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267492
Kanda, W. (2023). Systems and ecosystems in the circular economy: What’s the difference? Journal of Circular Economy, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.55845/RMDN3752
Kanda, W., Geissdoerfer, M., & Hjelm, O. (2021). From circular business models to circular business ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(6), 2814–2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2895
Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Kirchherr, J., Yang, N.-H. N., Schulze-Spüntrup, F., Heerink, M. J., & Hartley, K. (2023). Conceptualizing the circular economy (revisited): An analysis of 221 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 194, Article 107001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001
Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, Article 119942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942
Lehtimäki, H., Karhu, M., Kotilainen, J. M., Sairinen, R., Jokilaakso, A., Lassi, U., & HuttunenSaarivirta, E. (2024). Sustainability of the use of critical raw materials in electric vehicle batteries: A transdisciplinary review. Environmental Challenges, 16, Article 100966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100966
Mantere, S., & Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management, 38(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0188
Marjanović, M., & Williams, J. (2024). Mapping the emergence of the circular economy within the governance paths of shrinking cities and regions: A comparative study of Parkstad Limburg
(NL) and Satakunta (FI). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 17(3), 517– 534. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae019
Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches in economic geography. In E. Sheppard & J. B. Trevor (Eds.), A companion to economic geography (pp. 77–94). Blackwell.
Niang, A., Bourdin, S., & Torre, A. (2023). The geography of circular economy: Job creation, territorial embeddedness and local public policies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(12), 2939–2954. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2210749
Nijkamp, P., Kourtit, K., Krugman, P., & Moreno, C. (2024). Old wisdom and the new economic geography: Managing uncertainty in 21st century regional and urban development. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(10), Article 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100124
Ossio, F., Salinas, C., & Hernandes, H. (2023). Circular economy in the built environment: A systematic literature review and definition of the circular construction concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, Article 137738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137738
Pfotenhauer, S. M., Wentland, A., & Ruge, L. (2023). Understanding regional innovation cultures: Narratives, directionality, and conservative innovation in Bavaria. Research Policy, 52(3), Article 104704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104704
Pietrulla, F. (2022). Circular ecosystems: A review. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy, 3, Article 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2022.100031
Rajaonson, J., & Chembessi, C. (2024). Exploring circular economy transition pathways: A roadmap analysis of 15 Canadian local governments. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 17(3), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae015
Rantisi, N. M., & Boggs, J. S. (2020). Economic geography, relational. In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International encyclopedia of human geography (2nd ed., pp. 29–24). Elsevier.
Schlaile, M. P., Friedrich, J., & Zscheischler, J. (2024). Rethinking regional embeddedness and innovation systems for transitions towards just, responsible, and circular bioeconomies. Journal of Circular Economy, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55845/DTFI9420
Sheppard, E. (2011). Geographical political economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 319– 331. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq049
Sheppard, E. (2018). Heterodoxy as orthodoxy: Prolegomenon for a geographical political economy. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, M. S. Getler, & D. Wójcik (Eds.), New Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 159–178). Oxford University Press.
Skene, K. R., & Oarga-Mulec, A. (2024). The circular economy: The butterfly diagram, systems theory and the economic pluriverse. Journal of Circular Economy, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.55845/LIXE9236
Tapia, C., Bianchi, B., Pallaske, G., & Bassi, A. M. (2021). Towards a territorial definition of a circular economy: Exploring the role of territorial factors in closed-loop systems. European Planning Studies, 29(8), 1438–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1867511
Tartaruga, I., Sperotto, F., & Carvalho, L. (2024). Addressing inclusion, innovation, and sustainability challenges through the lens of economic geography: Introducing the hierarchical regional innovation system. Geography and Sustainability, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.10.002
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
Thomas, L. D. W., & Ritala, P. (2021) Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: A collective action view. Journal of Management, 48(3), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320986617
Thompson, J. (2022). A guide to abductive thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(5), 14101421. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160–3715/2022.5340
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
Truffer, B., Murphy, J. T., & Raven, B. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63–72. https://doi–org.ezproxy.uef.fi:2443/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004
Tukker, A., Akkerman, R., Heideveld, A., Quist, J., Vrijhoef, R., Withagen, C., & Beumer, M. (2024). Distribution of power and value crucial for a successful circular economy transition. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 4(4), 2413–2425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615–02400379–1
Uusikartano, J., Saha, P., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2022). The industrial symbiosis process as an interplay of public and private agency: Comparing two cases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344, Article 130996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130996
Vila-Henninger, L. Dupuy, C., Van Ingelgom, V., Caprioli, M., Teuber, F., Pennetreau, D., Bussi, M., & Le Gall, C. (2022). Abductive coding: Theory building and qualitative (re)analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(2), 968–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211067508
Williams, J. (2020). The role of spatial planning in transitioning to circular urban development. Urban Geography, 41(6), 915–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1796042
Willims, J. (2023). Circular cities: Planning for circular development in European cities. European Planning Studies, 31(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2060707
Yeung, H. (2005). Rethinking relational economic geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475–5661.2005.00150.x
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research, design & methods (4th ed.). Sage
Zolfagharian, M, Walrave, B, Raven, R., & Romme, A. G. L. (2019). Studying transitions: Past, present, and future. Research Policy, 48(9), Article 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012
Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
DSRPT is an education technology start-up in stealth mode.
Circular Economy is our first venture. We are on a mission to disrupt higher education. If you wish to learn more about us, drop us a message: dsrpt@circular-economy.org