Biodiversity, Circularity and Business Education: Examining Organizational Ambidexterity within Ecopedagogy and Ecoliteracy
Publication Alert
  • Home
  • Explore Content
    • Current Issues
  • About The Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Ethics and Editorial Policy
      • Guide for Editors
      • Guide for Reviewers
      • Guide for Authors
      • Impressum
  • Publish with Us
    • Call For Papers
    • Submit Your Paper
    • Author Information Package
    • Formatting Information for Authors
  • Login
    • Register
    • Login

Biodiversity, Circularity and Business Education: Examining Organizational Ambidexterity within Ecopedagogy and Ecoliteracy

Helen Kopnina, Simon Smith, Bastian Thomsen, Anita Garvey

Abstract

This article examines the growing need for explorative innovation in business education and organizational practices, particularly through positioning biodiversity at the core of business education. While current pedagogic approaches remain predominantly exploitative, there are notable efforts toward integrating more ecocentric and regenerative strategies. Using an Organizational Ambidexterity theoretical framework, we demonstrate how fostering critical thinking and action competencies in business curricula can lead to enhanced transformative educational practices (explorative innovation) that prioritize biodiversity. Through conceptual curriculum mapping and case study analysis, we explore how Organizational Ambidexterity serves as a framework for balancing and embracing the competing demands of traditional business models and sustainability imperatives. Our recommendations for business schools include embedding ambidextrous course structures that simultaneously integrate sustainability-focused innovation with conventional business education. We conclude by emphasizing the need for curriculum reform, policy advocacy, and institutional change to ensure that business education transcends exploitative paradigms and fosters explorative, nature-positive innovation.

Keywords
Biodiversity · Circular Economy · Degrowth · Ecoliteracy · Ecopedagogy · Organizational Ambidexterity

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55845/PUMJ8790

Download PDF

References

Atkins, J., Maroun, W., Atkins, B.C., & Barone, E. (2018). From the Big Five to the Big Four? Exploring extinction accounting for the rhinoceros. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31(6): 1606-1629.

Almond, R.E.A., Grooten, M., & Petersen, T. (Eds). (2020). Living Planet Report 2020- Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Retrieved from wwwfin.awassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2020_full_report.pdf

Anthony S.J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2023). Analysing corporate forest disclosure: How does business value biodiversity? Business Strategy and the Environment 32(1): 624-638. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3164

Banerjee, S.B., Jermier J.M., Peredo, A.M., Perey, R., & Reichel, A. (2021). Theoretical perspectives on organizations and organizing in a post-growth era. Organization 28(3): 337-357.

Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives 27(4): 287–298.

CABS. (2021). Chartered Association of Business Schools – Business schools and the public good. Retrieved from https://cabs-199e2.kxcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Chartered-ABS-Business-Schools-and-the-Public-Good-Final-1.pdf

CBD. (2023). COP15. Retrieved from: www.cbd.int/article/cop15-final-text-kunming-montreal-gbf-221222

Corvellec, H., Stowell, A.F., & Johansson, N. (2022). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology 26(2): 421-432.

Cote, C. (2021). Making the business case for sustainability. Harvard Business School Online. Retrieved from www.online.hbs.edu/blog/post/business-case-for-sustainability

Dahlmann., F. & Grosvold, J. (2018). Ambidextrous Environmental Managers: Trading off the Natural Environment?. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, p.10817).

Dempsey, J. (2013). Biodiversity loss as material risk: Tracking the changing meanings and materialities of biodiversity conservation. Geoforum 45(1): 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.04.002

Driscoll, C. & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1): 55-73.

Freeman, R.E. (2016). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In The Corporation and its stakeholders (pp. 125-138). University of Toronto Press.

Goodall, A., & Oswald. A. (2019). Researchers obsessed with FT Journals list are failing to tackle today’s problem. Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/b820d6f2-7016-11e9-bf5c-6eeb837566c5

Grogan-Fenn, J. (2023). Largest Asset Managers Failing on Climate, Biodiversity and People. ESG investor. Retrieved from www.esginvestor.net/largest-ams-failing-on-climate-biodiversity-and-people/.

Hassan, A., Roberts, M.L., & Atkins, J. (2020). Exploring Factors Relating to Extinction Disclosures: What Motivates Companies to Report on Biodiversity and Species Protection? Business Strategy and the Environment 29(3): 1419–1436.

Hursh, D., Henderson, J., & Greenwood, D. (2015). Environmental education in a neoliberal climate. Environmental Education Research 21(3): 299-318.

IPBES. (2019). Media Release: Nature’s Dangerous Decline ‘Unprecedented’ Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating’. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Retrieved from www.ipbes.net/news/Media-Release-Global-Assessment

IUCN. (2022). International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved from www.iucn.org/

Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow. London: Routledge.

Kahn, R. (2010). Critical Pedagogy, Ecoliteracy, and Planetary Crisis: The Ecopedagogy Movement. New York: Peter Lang.

Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. The Journal of Environmental Education 51(4), pp.280-291.

Kopnina, H., & Poldner. K. (2021). Circular Economy: Challenges and Opportunities for Ethical and Sustainable Business. Routledge: New York.

Kopnina, H., Padfield. R., & Mylan. J. (2023a). Sustainable Business: Key issues. New York: Routledge.

Kopnina, H., Boatta, F., Baranowski. M., & De Graad. F. (2023). Does waste equal food? Examining the feasibility of circular economy in the food industry. In H. Lehmann C, Hinske V de Margerie and AS Nikolova (Eds.), The Impossibilities of Circular Economy, Separating Aspirations from Reality (pp.11-22). New York: Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9781003244196-3.

Kopnina, H., Hughes, A.C., Zhang, P., Fellinger, E., Russell, M., Smith, S.M., & Tickner, L. (2024a). Business education and its paradoxes: Linking business and biodiversity through critical pedagogy curriculum. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4048

Kopnina, H., Zhang, S.R., Anthony, S., Hassan, A., & Maroun, W. (2024b). The inclusion of biodiversity into Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework: A strategic integration of ecocentric extinction accounting. Journal of Environmental Management 351: 119808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119808

Kumar, P. (Ed). (2012). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. London: Routledge.

March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 71–87.

Maroun, W., & Atkins. J. (2018). The emancipatory potential of extinction accounting: Exploring current practice in integrated reports. Accounting Forum 42(1): 102-118.

Moosmayer, D.C., Waddock, S., Wang L., Hühn, M.P., Dierksmeier, C., & Gohl, C. (2019). Leaving the road to Abilene: A pragmatic approach to addressing the normative paradox of responsible management education. Journal of Business Ethics 157: 913-932.

Muir, M., & Bernard. S. (2023). Biodiversity rises up business risk agenda as species decline worsens. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/5c8c2aa5-8735-4123-8092-aca3fcda37a4

OECD. (2020). A Comprehensive Overview of Global Biodiversity Finance. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/environment/resources/biodiversity/report-a-comprehensive-overview-of-global-biodiversity-finance.pdf

O’Reilly, C.A., & Tushman, M.L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4): 324–338.

Orr, D.W. (1990). Environmental education and ecological literacy. The Education Digest 55(9): 49.

Otero, I., Farrell, K.N., Pueyo, S., Kallis, G., Kehoe, L., Haberl, H., Plutzar, C., Hobson, P., García‐

Potting, J., Hekkert, M.P., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain. Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (PVL, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency). Policy Report, 2544. Retrieved from www.pbl.nl/en/publications/circular-economy-measuring-innovation-in-product-chains .

PRME. (2021). What is PRME? Retrieved from www.unprme.org/about

Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman. M.L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4): 685–695.

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., … & Foley, J.A. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a

Ross, A. (2023). Can biodiversity funds help investors protect wildlife? Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/9249e556-a017-4c94-8aec-d69661143707 .

Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp. P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 119: 314-325.

Savini, F. (2021). The circular economy of waste: recovery, incineration and urban reuse. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 64(12): 2114-2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1857226.

Skene, K.R. (2021). No goal is an island: the implications of systems theory for the Sustainable Development Goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23:9993-10012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01043-y

Smith, S.M. (2016). Management and organization – the 21st century global and international context. In P. Stokes, N. Moore, S.M. Smith, C. Rowland, & P. Scott (Eds.), Organizational Management: Approaches and Solutions (pp.1-26), London: Kogan Page.

Smith, S.M., Hughes, S., & Cripps. K. (2022). The Responsible Management Education Paradox: Applying the Conceptual Lens of Organizational Ambidexterity. In L. Moratis and F. Melissen (Eds.), Business schools and the Sustainable Development Goals: Explorations into the Future of Responsible Management Education and Shaping Sustainability Leadership, Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Smith, S.M., Cripps, K., Stokes, P., & Seraphin, H. (2023). The Principles for (Ir)Responsible Management Education: An exploration of the dynamics of paradox, the hidden curriculum, competencies and symbolization. Management Learning, 54(3):384-395.

Smith, T.S., Baranowski, M., & Schmid. B. (2021). Intentional degrowth and its unintended consequences: Uneven journeys towards post-growth transformations. Ecological Economics 190:107215.

Stokes, P., Moore, N., Moss, D., Mathews, M., Smith, S.M., & Yi-Peng, L. (2015). The micro-dynamics of intra-organizational and individual behaviour and their role in organizational ambidexterity boundaries. Human Resource Management 54(1): 63-86.

Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures. (2023). The TFND Nature-related Risk and Opportunity Management and Disclosure Framework. Final Draft – Beta v0.4. Retrieved from www.framework.tnfd.global/publications/ .

Thomsen, T.B. (2022). The precarity of nonhuman livelihoods: rethinking speciesism in a genocidal state (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford). Retrieved from www.ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f27283bc-079b-4ecd-beaf-b4030e50e44d

Thomsen, B., Cousins, T., Copeland, K., Thomsen, J., Coose, S., Mensah, A., & Gosler, A. (2022). Posthumanist Pluralities: Advocating for nonhuman species’ rights, agency, and welfare in ecosystem governance. In Advances in Ecological Research (Vol. 66, pp.117-146). Academic Press.

Thomsen, B., Vassallo, J., Wright, C., Chen, S., Thomsen, J., Villar, D., … & Muurlink, O. (2024). Reimagining entrepreneurship in the Anthropocene through a multispecies relations approach. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 22, e00507.

UNEP. (2023). Third Global monitoring report UNEP/POPS/COP.11/INF/38 Retrieved from www.chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ConferenceoftheParties/Meetings/COP11/tabid/9310/Default.aspx

Zhao, L., & Atkins. J. (2021). Assessing the emancipatory nature of Chinese extinction accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 41(1-2): 8-36.

Zu Ermgassen, S.O., Howard, M., Bennun, L., Addison, P.F., Bull, J.W., Loveridge, R., Pollard, E. & Starkey, M. (2022). Are corporate biodiversity commitments consistent with delivering ‘nature-positive’ outcomes? A review of ‘nature-positive’ definitions, company progress and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, p.134798.

How to Cite This Article

Kopnina, H.,  Smith, S., Thomsen, B. & Garvey, A. (2025). Biodiversity, Circularity and Business Education: Examining Organizational Ambidexterity within Ecopedagogy and Ecoliteracy. Journal of Circular Economy, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.55845/PUMJ8790

Copyright

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Author Notes

Helen Kopnina[1][*], Simon Smith[2], Bastian Thomsen[3][4] , Anita Garvey[1]

[1] Northumbria University, UK.

[2] Oxford Brookes University, UK.

[3] School of Business, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.

[4] School of Anthropology & Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, UK.

[*]Corresponding author: [email protected]

Published Details: Received: 14. October 2024 / Accepted: 1. October 2025 / Published: 13. October 2025

Never miss an article

Subscribe to our publication alert


    Never miss an article

    Journal of Circular Economy

    An applied scholarly journal on circular economy aimed at businesses, policymakers and civil society.

    Site Content

    Contacts

    [email protected]
    Copyright 2023 / ISSN 2752-163X / DSRPT UG / Roskilde University / Impressum
    Grange Web Design
    X

    DSRPT is an education technology start-up in stealth mode.
    Circular Economy is our first venture. We are on a mission to disrupt higher education. If you wish to learn more about us, drop us a message: [email protected]