Journal of Circular Economy

An applied scholarly journal on circular economy

Volume 2, Issue 1

January 2025

View PDF

Circular Entrepreneurship via Makerspaces Towards Fostering Sustainable Cities: A Mixed-Method Approach with Case Studies

N. Premyanov , E. Roma-Athanasiadou, Julie Metta , N. Tsoniotis , M. Angelidou, and A.C. Tsolakis

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of makerspaces in supporting circular entrepreneurship and their potential contribution to urban regeneration. Urban regeneration addresses urban challenges through sustainable and inclusive transformations. Circular makerspaces can support this direction by providing resources for makers and promoting a circular economy, while potentially acting as hubs for circular social innovation. However, to unlock makers' full sustainability potential, makerspaces require business support services that foster entrepreneurial mindsets towards a circular economy. This study uses a mixed-method approach, including action research, surveys, observations and case studies, to analyse the design and implementation of a circular accelerator programme in makerspaces across seven cities in Europe and Türkiye, supported with data gathered from 105 makers and 40 projects in circular entrepreneurship. The research suggests potential benefits such as the improvement of entrepreneurial skills, environmental impact awareness, and the enhanced network and collaborations, fostering further opportunities for the development of circular economy. The paper suggests that acceleration programmes via makerspaces focused on circular economy can have multiple benefits for both the makers and their urban context. These findings could support administrators, municipalities, urban planners and policy makers to examine additional ways to support urban regeneration and sustainability.

Keywords

Circular Economy · Maker Movement · Social Innovation · Citizen Participation · Innovation Ecosystem · Urban Regeneration

How to cite this article?

Premyanov, N., Roma-Athanasiadou, E., Metta, J., Tsoniotis, N., Angelidou, M., & Tsolakis, A. (2024). Circular Entrepreneurship via Makerspaces Towards Fostering Sustainable Cities: A Mixed-Method Approach with Case Studies. Journal of Circular Economy2(3). https://doi.org/10.55845/QZUU6387

References

Andrews, M. E., Borrego, M., & Boklage, A. (2021). Self-efficacy and belonging: The impact of a university makerspace. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0.

Al Sader, N., Kleinhans, R., & Van Ham, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial citizenship in urban regeneration in the Netherlands. Citizenship studies23(5), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1621266.

Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2018). Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. Journal of science and technology policy management, 9(2), 146-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0016.

Bank, N., Fichter, K., & Klofsten, M. (2017). Sustainability-profiled incubators and securing the inflow of tenants–The case of Green Garage Berlin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 157, 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.123.

Bergman Jr, B. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2020). Entrepreneurs in the making: Six decisions for fostering entrepreneurship through maker spaces. Business Horizons, 63(6), 811-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.004.

Browder, R. E., Aldrich, H. E., & Bradley, S. W. (2019). The emergence of the maker movement: Implications for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005.

Cheshire, J. & Batty M. (2022). The era of the megalopolis: How the world’s cities are merging. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/11/the-megalopolis-how-the-world-cities-merging-urbanization/ (accessed October 22, 2023).

Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers3(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1.

Coskun, A., Metta, J., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Çay, D., & Bachus, K. (2022). Make it a circular city: Experiences and challenges from European cities striving for sustainability through promoting circular making. Resources, Conservation and Recycling185, 106495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106495.

Coskun, A., Hofgärtner, R., Metta, J., Schmidt, A., & Tsolakis, A. C. (2024). Circular Makerspaces as Alternative Employment Platforms for Circular Jobs. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00413-2.

Cullen, U. A., & De Angelis, R. (2021). Circular entrepreneurship: A business model perspective. Resources, conservation and recycling168, 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105300.

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20.

De Oliveira, B. (2023). Participatory action research as a research approach: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Qualitative Research Journal23(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0101.

dos Santos Figueiredo, Y. D., Prim, M. A., & Dandolini, G. A. (2022). Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review. Land Use Policy113, 105873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873.

Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations:Technology, governance, globalization7(3), 11-14.

Doussard, M., Schrock, G., Wolf-Powers, L., Eisenburger, M., & Marotta, S. (2018). Manufacturing without the firm: Challenges for the maker movement in three US cities. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(3), 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17749709.

Doyle, G. (2019). A new era for reuse social enterprises in Ireland? The capacities required for achieving sustainability. Resources, Conservation and Recycling149, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.012.

Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2008). Rethinking sustainable urban regeneration: ambiguity, creativity, and the shared territory. Environment and Planning A40(6), 1416-1434. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39293.

Elwakil, R., Schroder, I., & Steemers, K. (2023). Circular maker cities: Maker space typologies and circular urban design. Buildings13(11), 2894. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112894.

European Commission. (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe, COM (2020) 98 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:9903b325-6388-11ea-b735-01aa75ed71a1.0017.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (accessed February 21, 2024).

Galuppo, L., Kajamaa, A., Ivaldi, S., & Scaratti, G. (2019). Translating sustainability into action: A management challenge in FabLabs. Sustainability11(6), 1676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061676.

Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., de Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of cleaner production190, 712-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159.

Ghisellini, P., & Ulgiati, S. (2020). Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. Journal of cleaner production243, 118360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118360

Girard, L. F., & Nocca, F. (2022). Urban values-centred regeneration in the perspective of the circular economy model: An overview of the key issues. Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Heritage, 438-456. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038955.

Gregori, P., Wdowiak, M. A., Schwarz, E. J., & Holzmann, P. (2019). Exploring value creation in sustainable entrepreneurship: Insights from the institutional logics perspective and the business model lens. Sustainability11(9), 2505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092505.

Gupta, H., Kumar, A., & Wasan, P. (2021). Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production295, 126253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253.

Hallen, B. L., Cohen, S. L., & Bingham, C. B. (2020). Do accelerators work? If so, how?. Organization Science31(2), 378-414. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1304.

Javidroozi, V., Carter, C., Grace, M., & Shah, H. (2023). Smart, sustainable, green cities: a state-of-the-art review. Sustainability15(6), 5353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065353.

Jefferson, T., Austen, S., Sharp, R., Ong, R., Lewin, G., & Adams, V. (2014). Mixed-methods research: What’s in it for economists?. The Economic and Labour Relations Review25(2), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304614530819.

JRC. (2023). Joint Research Centre. EU Makerspaces Map. European Commission. https://cop-demos.jrc.ec.europa.eu/eu-makerspaces-map (accessed October 20, 2024).

Kummitha, R. K. R. (2018). Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change137, 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.010.

Kruger, S., & Steyn, A. A. (2021). A conceptual model of entrepreneurial competencies needed to utilise technologies of Industry 4.0. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation22(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750320927359.

Leech, N. L., Dellinger, A. B., Brannagan, K. B., & Tanaka, H. (2010). Evaluating mixed research studies: A mixed methods approach. Journal of mixed methods research4(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809345262.

Levoso, A. S., Gasol, C. M., Martínez-Blanco, J., Durany, X. G., Lehmann, M., & Gaya, R. F. (2020). Methodological framework for the implementation of circular economy in urban systems. Journal of Cleaner Production248, 119227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119227.

Luederitz, C., Westman, L., Mercado, A., Kundurpi, A., & Burch, S. L. (2023). Conceptualizing the potential of entrepreneurship to shape urban sustainability transformations. Urban Transformations5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-023-00048-w.

Maravilhas, S., & Martins, J. S. (2018). Fab Labs and Makerspaces for Learning and Innovation: The Case of Arhte Program in Brazil. In Handbook of Research on Strategic Innovation Management for Improved Competitive Advantage (pp. 761-772). IGI Global.

Marotta, S. (2021). Making sense of ‘maker’: Work, identity, and affect in the maker movement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space53(4), 638-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20964839.

Mersand, S. (2021). The state of makerspace research: A review of the literature. TechTrends65(2), 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00566-5.

Millard, J., Sorivelle, M. N., Deljanin, S., Unterfrauner, E., & Voigt, C. (2018). Is the maker movement contributing to sustainability?. Sustainability10(7), 2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072212.

Metta, J., & Bachus, K. (2020). Pop-Machina: the breakthrough of the circular maker movement in Europe. Open Access Government.

Paes, V. D. C., Pessoa, C. H. M., Pagliusi, R. P., Barbosa, C. E., Argôlo, M., de Lima, Y. O., … & de Souza, J. M. (2023). Analyzing the challenges for future smart and Sustainable Cities. Sustainability15(10), 7996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107996.

Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation50, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003.

Pradel-Miquel, M. (2021). Analysing the role of citizens in urban regeneration: Bottom-linked initiatives in Barcelona. Urban Research & Practice14(3), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1737725.

Premyanov, N., Metta, J., Angelidou, M., Tsoniotis, N., Politis, C., Athanasiadou, E. R., & Tsolakis, A. C. (2022, July). Circular makerspaces as entrepreneurship platforms for smart and sustainable cities. In 2022 7th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech55088.2022.9854289.

Prifti, R., & Jaupi, F. (2020). Entrepreneurial urban regeneration: Business improvement districts as a form of organizational innovation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003103127.

Probst, L., Frideres, L., Pedersen, B., & Lidé, S. (2015). Collaborative Economy. Collaborative production and the maker economy. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General Growth. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/13423/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native (accessed October 20, 2024).

Q-Plan International. (2023) Data collected from questionnaires to collect feedback on the services’ performance / accelerator programme and outcomes, Zenodo [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8301519.

Ramella, F., & Manzo, C. (2018). Into the crisis: Fab Labs–a European story. The Sociological Review66(2), 341-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118758535.

Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2021). Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change164, 120391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120391.

Rahman, M., & Best, M. (2024). Sustainability of Makerspaces: Developing a Framework for Sustainable Community Innovation Centers. ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies2(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3675761.

Rimmer, M. (2023). The Medical Right to Repair: Intellectual Property, the Maker Movement, and COVID-19. Sustainability15(20), 14839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014839.

Roberts, P., & Hugh S., (1999). eds. Urban regeneration: a handbook. Sage.

Rosa, P., Ferretti, F., Pereira, Â. G., Panella, F., & Wanner, M. (2017). Overview of the maker movement in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC107298/jrc_technical_report_-_overview_maker_movement_in_eu.pdf (accessed October 20, 2024).

Saari, H., Åkerman, M., Kieslinger, B., Myllyoja, J., & Sipos, R. (2021). How open is the maker movement? Integrative literature review of the openness practices in the global maker movement. Sustainability13(24), 13559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413559.

Serwatka, A. (2018). Accelerators for startups in Europe. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting7(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2018.005.

Suchek, N., Ferreira, J. J., & Fernandes, P. O. (2022). A review of entrepreneurship and circular economy research: State of the art and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment31(5), 2256-2283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3020.

Tsolakis, A.C., Roma-Athanasiadou, E., Premyanov, N., & Tsoniotis, N. (2023). POP-MACHINA Circular Maker Accelerator Handbook. Pop-Machina project 821479 – H2020. https://pop-machina.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Pop-Machina-Circular-Maker-Accelerator-Handbook-v2.0.pdf (accessed February 21, 2024).

Tsui, T., Peck, D., Geldermans, B., & Van Timmeren, A. (2020). The role of urban manufacturing for a circular economy in cities. Sustainability13(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010023.

  1. (2017). GOAL 11: sustainable cities and communities. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/sustainable-development-goals/why-do-sustainable-development-goals-matter/goal-11 (accessed July 16, 2024).
  2. (2023). Entrepreneurs Riding the Wave of Circularity. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diae2023d6_en.pdf (accessed July 16, 2024)

Van Holm, E. J. (2015). Makerspaces and contributions to entrepreneurship. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences195, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.167.

Ward, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial urbanism and the management of the contemporary city: The examples of business improvement districts.

Wise, N., Özdemir, Ö. G., & Fillis, I. (2022). Creative entrepreneurship, urban transformation and the (Baltic) triangle model. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship24(2), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-02-2021-0017.

Yang, S., Kher, R., & Lyons, T. S. (2018). Where do accelerators fit in the venture creation pipeline? Different values brought by different types of accelerators. Entrepreneurship Research Journal8(4), 20170140. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0140.

Copyright info

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and
indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s
Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

X

DSRPT is an education technology start-up in stealth mode.
Circular Economy is our first venture. We are on a mission to disrupt higher education. If you wish to learn more about us, drop us a message: dsrpt@circular-economy.org