Journal of Circular Economy

An applied scholarly journal on circular economy

Volume 2, Issue 1

February 2025

View PDF

Behind Closed Doors: Examining the Stock of Clothing in Individuals’ Wardrobes

Veerle Vermeyen , Luc Alaerts, Ernst Worrell, Karel Van Acker, Filip Germeys

Abstract

Increasing the use intensity of individual garments is crucial in reducing the total environmental impact of clothing consumption. Implementing circular economy strategies, such as reuse, can intensify the use of garments. However, a deeper understanding of the current fulfilment of the need for clothing is essential for the effective implementation of circular economy strategies. To this end, we conducted an extensive wardrobe study on 156 adults living in Flanders (Belgium) in 2024. The study finds that participants had, on average, 198 garments in their wardrobe, of which only 2% was pre-owned and 22% was dormant (not used in the last 12 months). Further, 75% of dormant clothes are in good enough condition for reuse. This shows the considerable untapped potential to intensify the use of garments currently trapped in wardrobes. However, the results suggest that the potential to reactivate dormant garments is limited for two reasons: First, participants are unwilling to part with over half of their dormant garments, primarily because they believe they will prove useful in the future. Second, the observed scarcity of pre-owned garments in wardrobes suggests a low demand for reusable garments. The findings in this study provide essential groundwork for developing more effective policies to promote the full utilisation of garments in the transition to a CE for consumer clothing.

Keywords

Wardrobe Study · Circular Economy · Urban Stocks · Reactivation · Reuse · Consumer Behaviour

How to cite this article?

Vermeyen, V., Alaerts, L., Worrell, E., Van Acker, K., & Germeys, F. (2025). Behind Closed Doors: Examining the Stock of Clothing in Individuals’ Wardrobes. Journal of Circular Economy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.55845/OQEE5977

References

Armstrong, C. M., Niinimäki, K., Lang, C., & Kujala, S. (2016). A Use-Oriented Clothing Economy? Preliminary Affirmation for Sustainable Clothing Consumption Alternatives. Sustainable Development, 24(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.1602

Bardey, A., Booth, M., Heger, G., & Larsson, J. (2022). Finding yourself in your wardrobe: An exploratory study of lived experiences with a capsule wardrobe. International Journal of Market Research, 64(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785321993743

Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001

Bocken, N. M. P., Niessen, L., & Short, S. W. (2022). The Sufficiency-Based Circular Economy—An Analysis of 150 Companies. Frontiers in Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.899289

de Wagenaar, D., Galama, J., & Sijtsema, S. J. (2022). Exploring Worldwide Wardrobes to Support Reuse in Consumers’ Clothing Systems. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010487

Delanoeije, J., & Bachus, K. (2022). Measuring circular reuse magnitude and replacement rate: A new method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2022.106414

European Commission. (2014). Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe. COM(2014) 398 Final.

European Commission. (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan. COM(2020) 98 Final. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/

European Commission. (2022). EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles. COM(2022) 141 Final, 1(69), 5–24. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/textiles-strategy_en

European Environment Agency (EEA). (2022). Textiles and the environment: the role of design in Europe’s circular economy (Briefing no. 01/2022). Eionet Report – ETC/CE 2022/2. https://doi.org/10.2800/006659

Fletcher, K., & Klepp, I. G. (2017). Opening up the wardrobe : a methods book. ISBN 978-82-8390-121-4.

Fortuna, L. M., & Diyamandoglu, V. (2017). Optimization of greenhouse gas emissions in second-hand consumer product recovery through reuse platforms. Waste Management, 66, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2017.04.032

Fuchs, D., Sahakian, M., Gumbert, T., Giulio, A. Di, Maniates, M., Lorek, S., & Graf, A. (2021). Consumption Corridors. In Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life within Sustainable Limits. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367748746

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

Klepp, I. G., Laitala, K., & Wiedemann, S. (2020). Clothing Lifespans: What Should Be Measured and How. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156219

Laitala, K. (2014). Consumers’ clothing disposal behaviour – a synthesis of research results. International Journal of Consumer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12088

Laitala, K., & Klepp, I. G. (2020). What Affects Garment Lifespans? International Clothing Practices Based on a Wardrobe Survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219151

Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., Haugrønning, V., Throne-Holst, H., & Strandbakken, P. (2021). Increasing repair of household appliances, mobile phones and clothing: Experiences from consumers and the repair industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 125349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.125349

Laitala, K., Klepp, I., & Henry, B. (2018). Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072524

Maguire, H., & Fahy, F. (2023). Unlocking insights in the everyday: Exploring practices to foster sustainable maximum use of clothing. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100095

Maldini, I. (2021). From speed to volume : reframing clothing production and consumption for an environmentally sound apparel sector . Procedia PLATE – Product Lifetimes And The Environment.

Maldini, I., Duncker, L., Bregman, L., Piltz, G., Duscha, L., Cunningham, G., Vooges, M., Grevinga, T., Tap, R., & van Balgooi, F. (2017). Measuring the Dutch Clothing Mountain. Amsterdam: Publishing Lab. http://www.hva.nl/bibliotheek/contact/contactformulier/contact.html,

Maldini, I., Haugrønning, V., & De León, L. (2023). Studying clothing consumption volumes through wardrobe studies: a methodological reflection. Procedia PLATE – Product Lifetimes And The Environment. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/122687

Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., De Meester, S., & Dewulf, J. (2021). Development of circularity indicators based on the in-use occupation of materials. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123889

Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G. A., Alaerts, L., Van Acker, K., de Meester, S., & Dewulf, J. (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045

Mugge, R., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2005). Design Strategies to Postpone Consumers’ Product Replacement: The Value of a Strong Person-Product Relationship. The Design Journal. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069205789331637

Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9

Nilsson, K., Strömberg, H., Rexfelt, O., Ljungberg, E., & Sköld, S. (2023). Nostalgia, gift, or nice to have – an analysis of unused products in Swedish households. Procedia PLATE – Product Lifetimes And The Environment.

OVAM. (2022). Sorteeranalyse – huisvuil 2019-2021. OVAM, D/2022/5024/02.

Pauliuk, S. (2018). Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019

Piontek, F. M., Rehberger, M., & Müller, M. (2019). Development of a Functional Unit for a Product Service System: One Year of Varied Use of Clothing. In Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management (pp. 99–104). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92237-9_11

Poikolainen, J., Sekki, S., Autio, M., Kettunen, H., & Räisänen, R. (2023). Towards Durability and Extended Lifespan – Caring for Clothes as a Sustainability Practice. Procedia PLATE – Product Lifetimes And The Environment.

Polizzi di Sorrentino, E., Woelbert, E., & Sala, S. (2016). Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1016-2

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. https://books.google.be/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=7A4lDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Doughnut+Economics&ots=wzCk6qPvv7&sig=pav9CDZDqAxPid9phkp_3RPpZVQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Doughnut Economics&f=false

Reich, R. H., Vermeyen, V., Alaerts, L., & Van Acker, K. (2023). How to measure a circular economy: A holistic method compiling policy monitors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106707

Rhee, J., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2019). ‘The wardrobe diet’: teaching sustainable consumption through experience with undergraduates in the USA. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2019.1590864

Rijkswaterstaat. (2019). Samenstelling van het huishoudelijk restafval, sorteeranalyses 2019 – Gemiddelde driejaarlijkse samenstelling 2018. 37.

Roos, S., Zamani, B., Sandin, G., Peters, G. M., & Svanström, M. (2016). A life cycle assessment (LCA)-based approach to guiding an industry sector towards sustainability: the case of the Swedish apparel sector. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.146

Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266

Takens, J., Brants, M., Lenaerts, M., Smet, K., Spaeper, V., & Talboom, S. (2023). De Duurzame Modemonitor.

Turunen, L. L. M. (2023). Buy, use, sell, repeat – Resale companies ’ role in sufficiency-based circular economy. Procedia PLATE – Product Lifetimes And The Environment.

WRAP. (2022). Citizen Insights: Clothing Longevity and Circular Business Models receptivity in the UK. November 2021.

Copyright info

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

X

DSRPT is an education technology start-up in stealth mode.
Circular Economy is our first venture. We are on a mission to disrupt higher education. If you wish to learn more about us, drop us a message: dsrpt@circular-economy.org